​​Patently Strategic - Patent Strategy for Startups

By: Aurora Patent Consulting | Ashley Sloat Ph.D.
  • Summary

  • A patent focused podcast for inventors, founders, and IP professionals, covering the finer points, sharp edges, and nuances of startup patent strategy. Each monthly episode will feature a round-table style discussion amongst experts in the field of patenting. Patently Strategic is brought to you by Aurora Consulting, a patent strategy boutique that specializes in working with early stage life science, medical​ device, digital health, and software companies to develop valuable patent portfolios through highly tailored, comprehensive strategies.
    © 2024 Aurora Consulting LLC
    Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodes
  • Petition Practice: Correcting PTO Errors With Your Patent
    Nov 5 2024

    Send us a text

    Patent examiners can make mistakes. Patent office clerks can misfile paperwork and cause procedural errors. The software tools, document formats like DOCX, and the IT systems your application passes through can have bugs. What recourse do you have when quality issues creep in at this stage? This is where petition practice, fortunately, comes to the rescue.

    ** Quality Patents Part 5 **

    This is our final episode in a multi-part series focused on quality patents. The prior four episodes have all been about managing quality for everything in your immediate control. Steps you and your practitioner should be taking before and after your patent is granted. But what about the last mile, where you’re turning your carefully crafted patent application over to the patent office for examination and prosecution?

    Patent petition practice is the process of filing formal requests, referred to as “petitions,” with the USPTO or other relevant patent offices to address procedural and administrative issues that can arise during the patent application process. Filing petitions can be an essential step to correct course when rules are misapplied, procedural errors occur, administrative actions need to be reversed, or deadlines are missed.

    ** Guest Hosts: Julie Burke and Michael Spector **

    Julie Burke is a registered patent agent and former USPTO employee with 20 years of experience at the patent office. Julie rose up at the PTO to become a Quality Assurance Specialist – the type of manager you’d call when your case got off track. During this time, she handled more than 900 petitions at the patent office! After leaving the PTO, she founded her own consulting company, IP Quality Pro LLC, where she helps patent attorneys navigate complex situations in the patent system to protect their inventor’s ideas. This experience from both sides of the petition practice table has given Julie a level of access, experience, and insights shared by few in the industry. Julie is also presently an advisor for Petition.ai, the first searchable database of US patent prosecution petitions and associated documents. Julie is joined by the co-founder of Petition.ai, Michael Spector.

    ** Discussed Links **

    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 1: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/quality-patents
    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 2: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/ptab-survival-guide
    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 3: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/continuation-practice
    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 4: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/itc-proofing-patents
    ⦿ After Final Practice: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/new-podcast-after-final-practice

    ** Follow Aurora Patents **

    ⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
    ⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
    ⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
    ⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
    ⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
    ⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
    ⦿ YouTube: https://www.yo

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 9 mins
  • Keeping Patent Pirates at Bay: ITC Portfolio Proofing Strategies
    Oct 1 2024

    Send us a text

    For inventors, the promise of the patent system is the right to exclude others from making, using, importing, and selling their patented innovations for a limited period. But how do patent holders actually enforce those rights, particularly when the copycat product is being manufactured outside of domestic jurisdiction? In an otherwise challenging time for rights assertion, the ITC – or International Trade Commission – can be one of the most impactful long-range weapons an inventor has in their arsenal for stopping patent pirates.

    The ITC has the authority to grant exclusion orders, which are enforced by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to block the importation of infringing products at U.S. ports of entry.

    But how can you access the ITC, what are its requirements, how can you afford it, and what should you be thinking about now to help future proof your patent portfolio for the most effective use later at the ITC? We’re answering all of these questions in an episode that is part of our ongoing series on patent quality – aimed at not just getting a granted patent but in having one that will hopefully be valuable and stand the test of time.

    ** Guest Host: Evan Langdon **

    Because experience is the best teacher, we’ve enlisted the help of Evan Langdon to guest host this month’s episode. Evan is a partner at Fabricant LLP and the Chair of its ITC practice. Evan has been focused on ITC litigation for the past 15 years, both offensively and defensively, having represented clients in more than thirty Section 337 cases at the ITC. Evan is recognized among the nation’s top ITC practitioners by Chambers USA and Chambers Global.

    ** Episode Overview **

    ⦿ What is the ITC and what are its advantages over court-based litigation to stop infringers?
    ⦿ Requirements for filing an ITC Action
    ⦿ Litigation financing options for the ITC
    ⦿ Offensive and defensive strategies at the ITC
    ⦿ Patent drafting and portfolio strategy tips for increasing your odds at the ITC
    ⦿ Masimo v. Apple and the ITC's import ban of the Apple Watch
    ⦿ The recent Lashify case and what it means for the domestic industry requirement

    ** Discussed Links **

    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 1: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/quality-patents
    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 2: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/ptab-survival-guide
    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 3: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/continuation-practice
    ⦿ Patent Anatomy: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/new-podcast-patent-anatomy
    ⦿ RESTORE Act: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/restoring-injunctive-relief

    ** Follow Aurora Patents **

    ⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
    ⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
    ⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
    ⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
    ⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
    ⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
    ⦿ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aurorapatents/

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 7 mins
  • Continuation Practice: Quality Patents Part 3
    Sep 6 2024

    Send us a text

    There’s not a more important concept that’s more widely misunderstood by those newer to patenting than continuations. So we’re dedicating Part 3 of our series on quality patents to everything you need to know about this essential step for future proofing and increasing the value of your portfolio.

    Void of pursuing continuations, the language of your patent is frozen in time at issuance. The specifics of the enforceable boundaries of your protection are forever fixed to the claims you chose to pursue with your initial application – but not necessarily with the full breadth of your invention as conceived. For many reasons, practitioners and inventors will often choose to limit how much of an invention is claimed in an initial application. But then the future happens. Case law changes. New competitors arise. New prior art surfaces. And challenges may come in the form of litigation or IPRs as we discussed in our last episode. With a closed family, all you can do is hope you had the right foresight to predict this future with your static document.

    Continuations, on the other hand, allow patent owners to keep patent families open – in other words, not textually frozen in time at issuance. When done right and timely, the patent family becomes a series of living documents, allowing a patent owner to claim and capture the full scope and breadth of the conceived innovation, but with the benefit of hindsight, known R&D outcomes, and changing market conditions.

    ** Episode Overview **

    ⦿ The basics of continuation practice and its strategic benefits
    ⦿ Types of continuation applications and how and when each applies
    ⦿ The close cousin concepts of terminal disclaimers and prosecution latches
    ⦿ The potential unfortunate consequences of the recent Sonos v. Google decision regarding a very common use of continuation practice

    ** Mossoff Minute **

    In this month's Mossoff Minute, Adam discusses the introduction of the RESTORE Act. This is an exciting new piece of legislation aimed at restoring patent owners’ abilities to obtain injunctions to stop infringers from continuing to steal innovations after being found guilty of doing so.

    ** Discussed Links **

    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 1: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/quality-patents
    ⦿ Quality Patents Part 2: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/ptab-survival-guide
    ⦿ Patent Anatomy: https://www.aurorapatents.com/blog/new-podcast-patent-anatomy

    ** Follow Aurora Patents **

    ⦿ Home: https://www.aurorapatents.com/
    ⦿ Twitter: https://twitter.com/AuroraPatents
    ⦿ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aurora-cg/
    ⦿ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/aurorapatents/
    ⦿ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/aurorapatents/
    ⦿ TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@aurorapatents
    ⦿ YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@aurorapatents/

    Thanks for listening!

    ---
    Note: The contents of this podcast do not constitute legal advice.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 15 mins

What listeners say about ​​Patently Strategic - Patent Strategy for Startups

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    3
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.