LISTENER

Brad W. Mackinaw

  • 38
  • reviews
  • 7
  • helpful votes
  • 88
  • ratings

NOT MUCH

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 07-04-25

Given the skill of the author, this could have been an amazing read. However, the book is short on details, analysis and substance. It is totally lacking in any new or unique perspective. It offers nothing to set it apart from other, more insightful books.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

which Africa is it

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 06-27-25

Is it the Africa of a new inexperienced hunter or of a super sniper?
Is he working together with his wife, or is she a bumbling idiot?
Does he love the native population or are they simple and niave?
The one constant is that Ruark remains a legend in his own mind.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

What a beautiful descriptive story

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 06-05-25

This was a great read. Her descriptive talent is only matches by her amazing, emotional performance.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A great yarn

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-12-25

When you focus on this as a fictional work, it's a great read. Don't nitpick about the details and enjoy.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Best of the best

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 04-17-25

Am amazing story. Well written with a minimum of hyperpole and grand standing. Kane has written two of the best books on the war in the Pacific.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

WELL DONE!!

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-01-25

A great job. Great individual stories combined with an excellent analysis of the larger picture. Gives a good insight into the Japanese perspective.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Not enough deep dive

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-01-25

I would have liked to see much more detailed analysis of the air war - Especially from the Chinese/Russian perspective. Also, the book seems rather dismissive of the MIG and it's pilots.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Not quite LUCKY JACK

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-12-24

This was a little bit of a disappointment. I would have liked more of a deeper dive into the character development. And the older brother seems to be the best storyline to develop.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

ENOUGH!!!

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
1 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-02-24

This book could have been spectacular... The narrative was not up to snuff. Far too shrill and whiney.
Also more perspective and less broad judgement of the police and prosecutors. The flaw is glaring - especially in a book so eye opening and intriguing

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

DID IT OR DIDN'T IT???

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-02-24

The dispatches and the context was excellent, especially the insight into captains and admirals.

However, the author ends with a long description of how the British Navy was not relevant and then seems to contradict himself.
A more complete analysis of either position would have been better appreciated.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!