LISTENER

David

  • 53
  • reviews
  • 104
  • helpful votes
  • 145
  • ratings

Contribution to Understanding? Or Psychedelic Fantasy?

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 06-22-25

Sizeable intro at a graduate level on the topic of AI, including and largely based on speculation about an AI’s (and AI communities’) perceptions of the world: both what they would be and how they might be constructed.
I cannot decide if there was any value in it at all, so I plan to listen a couple more times and will update this review accordingly.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Best Book In Years on the Subject of Algorithms

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-02-25

Perfectly enjoyable, highly informative, full of new details on stories I’d heard before but clearly did not know.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Some refreshing approaches to the understanding of the quantum world. Our world.

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 04-18-25

I liked the treatment of the misguided Everettian view of Many Worlds: use it for the insights it gives while discarding its overall preposterousness.
Professor Ball: do it again please.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Constant Nagging Diatribe

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 03-15-25

A genuine desire to improve education for both the recipients of that education and of the public in general pervades the book. However it only briefly touches on the actual need to transcend the Doctoral system that perpetuates the fawning and ass-kissing that the system enthrones that doesn’t lend itself to real creative thought and research. Far be it from a doctoral student to have ideas out of line with old professor fudnik or Doctor pambynamby.
The revision of that system to more of a meritocratic mean is key.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A great deal of Apostrophe on how History is done

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 07-15-24

Debates on Imperial Britain’s management of India are a level of extrapolation too far from what the book should have been…analysis of historiography would be a better description than The Roman Empire

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Be prepared for poor narration

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-15-24

Narrator does not know that kw is kilowatts GW gigawatts and so on. He reads them as k w and G W. it’s irritating. But the info is very worthwhile

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Beautiful Prose - Poetic Exposition

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 01-04-24

There is nothing at all to dislike in this, unless length be not a merit.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Pronunciation Can Distract from Topic

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-26-23

This is a marvellous collection of thoughts and debates by the top minds in Physics. Superb. However one of the readers has an irritating way of pronouncing various key scientific words. I wonder if he was expeerimenting with the audience. Spearmint is a flavour- not a scientific paradigm.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Mixed Feelings

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-02-23

Excellent, technically, in all respects. A very real and realist/realistic approach on a wide-ranging field of topics.
However Smil is clearly a cheerleader of the status quo. His overall message is “things will go about how they have always gone, because we humans change little in our foresight and ability to pre-plan.
I get the impression that, were he sent back in time to 1899 he would have little to say about the “over enthusiastic proponents of horseless carriages. Flying machines a ridiculous fantasy”.
Worthwhile all the same.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Big Headed Parochialism

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 07-12-23

Don’t send music or art or philosophy to the aliens….send basic physics which they already know and learn in the nursery (if they even NEED to learn it). To send our “achievements” in science to a species thousands of years advanced beyond us would be silliness beyond belief.
Send something the aliens would really be interested by: “we have been searching here and here using these methods for this long and we only found YOU so far”.
You make yourself infinitely interesting and enjoyable by talking about the other person not yourself. :-)

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup