LISTENER

horoscopy

  • 43
  • reviews
  • 220
  • helpful votes
  • 49
  • ratings

Hard to like this. Book is really Dull.

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-06-22

Narration & book is very dull & I think really is just rehashing a lot of the things I have heard from Rickard's podcasts on youtube. He has some interesting information, but it is really really written (and read) in a very dull fashion that it is hard to pay attention to it for a length of time.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful

Why the author mostly ignores the obvious theory?

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 07-06-22

I am trying to understand why there are not many more people seeing this as an "open and shut case".

Sirhan shot 6 out of the 8 bullets while being wrestled on the ground & even punched in the face, The bullets went everywhere, Some even ricocheted off of walls, floor and ceiling. This easily explains 1. why some of the bullets were fragmented (I think the concrete floor, ceiling and wall were a lot harder than the head of RFK). 2. why at least one bullet mysteriously hit him from up and behind the ear after ricocheting off of the concrete surfaces….(as many of the conspiracy theories argue that it could not have been Sirhan since he was shooting from RFKs front. and 3. why there were 13 “bullets” instead of 8….this is due to some of the bulllets fragmenting into 2 or 3 pieces. Author does not really discuss why the "bullet/s" in RFK's head was/were fragmented in the first place. To me, that makes it seem like she is not being objective but wishing to write a very very long conspiracy theory book , but many many other people seem to avoid this seemingly obvious conclusion too. I am trying to understand what i am missing here or why so many seem so stupid .

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

seems like a solid book so far

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 01-21-21

have not read all of it, but seems solid so far. good narrator.
I do recommend.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Dense reading , but in a very good way.

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-04-19

this book is packed with information and many might say that it is "Dry reading", but really the author (who is a professor at Oxford University) is just trying to convey is vast array of knowledge on the period. I have listened/read his other book also "The Inheritance of Rome" and this is like a continuation of that volume. I look forward to reading anything more in the future by Professor Chris Wikham and would like to thank him also for writing this as well as his other book "The Inheritance of Rome" . These are both excellent books to listen to as well as just study/analyze.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

lots of nice writing, but kind of light on history

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-19-19

just like the other Tom Holland books I have read , I felt it was nice, sweet and fluffy, but kind of lacking in substance.

btw , I do think (along with many others) that "Rubicon" was his masterpiece. this is kind of the closest he has come to that I think, but still a bit too fluffy in content.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

15 people found this helpful

Long, disorganized, and very long winded rambling

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 08-26-19

too long, disorganized, and seemed like the book was just more interested in length than in quality, concise organization, etc.

I will look for a book that hits more concicely , hones in on the main themes instead of just rambling on and on and on about just anything, Persian music, literature, just on and on about anything, not much organization,

plus it kind of skips to the 1500s and leaves out quite a lot of history before hand. I Was interested more in the ORIGINS of the "Persian" people, who are they really?

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

another cash payout to a wannabe psychologist

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-08-19

how many times I heard "George Anthony " sexually abusing the child or his daughter, my god, anyone really believe that?

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Eh...its OKAY,,though seemed a bit monotone/boring

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-09-19

This "Course" is just a quick overview/ relisting of all the major "stories" of the fall of the Roman Empire from Augustus onwards. I didn't think it was a bad listen, though , I have listened to far better and more exciting/interesting courses/books.

The voice narration of the professor seemed also different than in previous other Great Courses that I have listened to. Mainly it seemed more kind of monotone and like it had been re-recorded and edited and was not a real passionate, enthusiastic (thinking engaged with speaking) "speech" type of course.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

6 people found this helpful

A Treasure to find on Audible!

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 09-06-18

I hope Audible will provide more books like this one. I could listen to this 100 x. it is that good!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

14 people found this helpful

Prof. Fagan should have spoken (& not read) SLOWER

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 04-11-18

DISSAPPOINTED...as I much enjoyed Professor Fagan's course on The History of Ancient Rome, where he actually takes his time and speaks instead of quickly reading off his speech. He speaks so fast and with his Irish accent makes what he is saying nearly unlistenable .

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup