
A Christian Apologetic
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to Cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Please try again
Unfollow podcast failed
Please try again
$0.00 for first 30 days
Access a growing selection of included Audible Originals, audiobooks, and podcasts.
You will get an email reminder before your trial ends.
Audible Plus auto-renews for $7.95/mo after 30 days. Upgrade or cancel anytime.
Buy for $5.99
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use, License, and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
-
Narrated by:
-
Virtual Voice

This title uses virtual voice narration
Virtual voice is computer-generated narration for audiobooks.
It is certainly a humiliating confession, but probably mental and moral inertia have much to do with the unpopularity of Apologetics. It is hard work to examine the rational ground of one’s religious convictions, to thresh out honestly the arguments for and against one’s faith. And much unquestioning belief, as well as much soul-disturbing doubt, springs from no more dignified source than unwillingness to undergo the exertion incident to painstaking inquiry.
Others, again, who are not obnoxious to the charge of laziness, shrink from Apologetics because of a certain half-formulated fear. If an examination of evidence be instituted, is it not a little doubtful whither the process may ultimately lead? They believe now, asking no questions; but they are aware that many objections to Christianity have been raised, and that these have been accounted cogent by men of distinguished intelligence. Were it not rashness, then, to embark on so problematical a venture? It is not always easy to characterise this mood justly; according to circumstances, it may signify cowardice, or simply prudence. To tremble before the possible verdict of facts may easily pass into conscious insincerity; but, on the other hand, no one is under obligation to expose himself to danger unnecessarily. The plain man may easily be fooled by specious arguments; is it not wiser for him to eschew all discussion, and trust implicitly the decision of such experts as he may choose? Undoubtedly there is a certain validity in this plea, and many must act thus. But, after all, such reasoning more or less begs the question. Experts are divided—how guarantee that a man shall choose wisely between them? Thus we are brought back to the point at which we started. The moment that a man is confronted with the Apologetic problem, he must face it to the best of his ability. If it be only in the decision as to which guide he is to follow, he must determine this rationally, in view of what appears to him good evidence. And this is to develop an Apologetic.
No reviews yet