Babies by Design
The Ethics of Genetic Choice
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to Cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Please try again
Unfollow podcast failed
Please try again
Prime members: New to Audible?Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.
Babies by Design
Narrated by:
David Wood
Buy for $18.17
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
-
Narrated by:
-
David Wood
-
By:
-
Ronald M Green
About this listen
Already technology enables parents to select some genetic traits for their children, and soon it will be possible to begin to shape ourselves as a species. Countering loud cries of alarm, bioethics expert Ronald Green explains why our fears about genetic engineering are overblown and how we can move forward responsibly to create a better future.
©2007 Yale University Press (P)2007 Yale University Press
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup
Critic reviews
"In this clear-eyed and generally optimistic book, both promise and risk are ably weighed and balanced. The science is clearly explained, and there are signposts to help guide us through the moral maze." ( The Economist)
The author has clearly put effort and thought into the "ethics" aspect, but I feel like he doesn't have the philosophical background to do it justice. For example, he tends to call controversial things "ethically dubious" or that something is "a serious concern" merely because it's unpopular. These are appeals to popularity on the one hand, and avoid confronting uninformed, irrational public opinions using science. I suspect this populist bent is intended to avoid bristling readers with a bias against genetic engineering. I don't agree that watering down is the best strategy here. If I were writing this book, I would have said "some people see this thing as ethically dubious and here's why they're incorrect" and "something has been called a serious concern by people who make the following mistake". Being confrontational is not worse than being disingenuous.
He develops an ethical framework that distinguishes interventions that fight disease from interventions that provide enhancement. This distinction is unhelpful because "disease" and "enhancement" include baggage like status quo bias and naturalness bias. He does better on the topic of safety, where there is an objective medical reality to point to.
Strong on the science, weaker on the ethics
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.