
Bible and Sword
England and Palestine from the Bronze Age to Balfour
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
$0.00 for first 30 days
Buy for $19.74
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Wanda McCaddon
Two-time Pulitzer Prize - winning historian Barbara Tuchman explores the complex relationship of Britain to Palestine that led to the founding of the modern Jewish state - and to many of the problems that plague the Middle East today.
From early times, the British people have been drawn to the Holy Land through two major influences: the translation of the Bible into English and, later, the imperial need to control the road to India and access to the oil in the Middle East. Under these influences, one cultural and the other political, countless Englishmen - pilgrims, crusaders, missionaries, merchants, explorers, and surveyors - have made their way to the land of the ancient Hebrews.
With the lucidity and vividness that characterizes her work, Barbara Tuchman brings to life the development of these twin motives - the Bible and the sword - in the consciousness of the British people, until they were finally brought together at the end of World War I when Britain's conquest of Palestine from the Turks and the solemn moment of entering Jerusalem were imminent. Requiring a gesture of matching significance, that event evoked the Balfour Declaration of 1917, establishing a British-sponsored national home for the modern survivors of the people of the Old Testament.
In her account, first published in 1956, Ms. Tuchman demonstrates that the seeds of today's troubles in the Middle East were planted long before the first efforts at founding a modern state of Israel.
©1984 Barbara W. Tuchman (P)2009 Blackstone Audio, Inc.Listeners also enjoyed...




















Critic reviews
"In her métier as a narrative popular historical writer, Barbara Tuchman is supreme." ( Chicago Sun-Times)
People who viewed this also viewed...


















Reader perfectly matched to the text
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Great historical insight into how we got to today
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
She starts out by claiming that since she's Jewish, she would be too biased to write about modern Israel. But she immediately begins going after Christianity, as if she's completely blind to that strong bias.
It would be so bad, except that she does seem to be ignorant of many of the key facts upon which both Christian and non-Christian scholars generally agree. She makes sweeping assumptive statements, such as saying that Christianity became official under Constantine, which it certainly did not - he simply claimed to have converted, at least partially, to Christianity. The official status came later.
Tuchman also summarizes New Testament stories, apparently without having read them first. She claims that Joseph of Arimathea was an apostle, which he certainly wasn't - 14 are listed in the scriptures, but Joseph was not among them, as he was a general disciple, not an apostle. I don't want to nit-pick, but these major mistakes take away my confidence in Tuchman's writing as a whole in this case.
The anti-Christian bias is perhaps strongest in her evaluation of the motives of Crusaders. Certainly, many motives drove people to join the Crusades. When you examine the lists of those who went, and the money they spent to go, and the plans they made, it becomes evident that piety, misplaced or not, was a stronger motive for the typical Crusader than gold or the sluffing off of excess sons. But Tuchman minimizes or dismisses entirely that motive at nearly every opportunity.
I wish this book was more like The Zimmerman Telegram.
Great writer, but bias really hurts this one
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Oscar-Worthy Performance!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Brilliant
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Still Relevant
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The later books sections does increase in quality, but it's quite a slog to get there. The criticality of non integrated eastern Jews was somewhat interesting, given I tend to hear and read so much about the Dreyfus affair as the catalysis as opposed to situational pogroms.
The book does provide some interesting context to indicate just how little power western zionism had, the Rothchilds being the exception(amusingly, while I was reading the book, I had the misfortune to sit next to a man who assured me that the Rothschilds rule the world). It is slightly chuckle inducing when she mentions her own ancestors casually in the integrationist camps.
While she would managed to keep mental seperation from her topics in later years, this early work contains more than a few overreaches and indicates her preferences.
Perhaps she has too much cultural-emotional skin in the game, or perhaps because the book was written in the 1950s, when sympathy was high for Israel and the plight of other peoples was not apparent. I suspect that now that when we have seen distinct arab nations with vastly different ideologies invading each other, he claims of geographical ratios rings more hollow.
Nowhere near the quality I expect from Tuchman
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Fascinating
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Great Diplomatic & Military History
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Enjoyable book and pleasant reader.
Wish it had gone further into 20th Century.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.