Wonderful primer into adjunct medicine

The performance: such a beautiful reading voice but I found myself cursing aloud the stereotyping of the voices that the reader tried to distinguish. Not every southern American sounds like they rely on the comfort of strangers, Germans as Bond villains, Italians as Super Mario, Irish as Father Ted and working class Brits as if they come from the set of East Enders. Perhaps in a fictional work or a spoof, but I felt the efforts both distracting and insulting.

Otherwise, a wonderful primer into placebo, nacebo, mindfulness, hypnosis, talking therapies, biofeedback, vagal stimulation, among others. More than a mind/body:spirit smorgasbord, skepticism and data is presented in an engaging manner, nicely processing scientific literature with journalistic interviews.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Intriguing and ultimately empowering

Beyond merely interesting, Cure is nothing short of mind-blowing in some respects, and even where the research conducted to date raises more questions than it yields answers on the inter-dependence of mind and body, it is ultimately empowering. Highly recommended.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Medical equivalent book to “Scientific Creationism

Would you try another book from Jo Marchant and/or Genevieve Swallow?

NEVER!

Has Cure turned you off from other books in this genre?

This is a trash book based upon content. The narrator is fine.

Any additional comments?

I listened to “Cure” by Jo Marchant after reading glowingly positive reviews in the NY Times, NPR, etc. As a PhD in chemistry with many years as a tenured professor at a top 20 university followed by many years in biotech, I found it to be a horribly non-scientific book that pretends to evaluate the placebo effect and the influence of the mind but really is an indictment of evidence-based medicine. Jo Marchant has written the equivalent to medicine of books on “Scientific Creationism” for evolutionary biology: pseudoscience at best, and believe and superstition masquerading as science at worst.

For example, the studies of placebos are done by one scientific group in the world and with limited number of patients. The studies of alternative medicine are generally uncontrolled and have too few participants. Most evidence is simply individual testimony. Indeed, like nearly all alternative medicine proponents, Jo Marchant consistently uses such testimony rather than randomized clinical trials because the evidence from RCT is overwhelmingly that alternative treatments have no benefit except the placebo effect.

As such, the book is nothing more than an ode to the influence of placebo which all physicians and pharmaceutical/biotech scientists would fully acknowledge is significant. But, Ms. Marchant then tries to indict reputable scientists and companies that are working on treating diseases in which the mind is of negligible effect: cancer, cardiovascular, etc.

As the head of the alternative medicine at NHS told Ms. Marchant, the only sensible and ethical scientific position is to give medicines with active ingredients as these also include any placebo effect since patients expect the medicines to work. Any other position is unethical, wastes the money of patients, and can prevent or delay needed medical treatment for diseases like cancer that are so critical for early diagnosis.

I have utter contempt for Ms. Marchant. My guess from years as a professor, is that she was one of the graduate students who do little more than run standard experiments, isolate a product and write up the results for some obscure journal. She certainly never learned the skepticism and analytical thought processes of a scientist, and should have her PhD rescinded!

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful