Accurate portrayal of Libertarian Cyberspace

I enjoyed this book. It was a good portrayal of the Libertarian Cyberscene. It did get a bit tedious at the very end and I became a bit bored with it. I felt the author ran out of potent points and material and became a bit repetitive. I think Civil Libertarians would enjoy it.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

Misleading description

This book is a left-wing political screed by an obvious Maxist feminist, and should have been represented as such. The description of the story is very misleading.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

7 people found this helpful

If I Use Big Words, Does It Make Me Smart & Witty

As someone who usually enjoys reading about the culture of technology, I was looking forward to listening to this book. However, my expectations of the next Po Bronson or Sherry Turkle were sadly misplaced.

If there is a point to this book, I confess that I haven't a clue. I gave up on it after listening to nearly half of it. I was hoping for an alternative viewpoint to Rushkoff's 'Cyberia' or Levy's 'Hacker Crackdown', since she does touch a bit on both the Rave and Cypherpunk cultures. What I was not expecting was what appears to be a diatribe on the author's own hard feelings towards the industry. Everything she has to say is extremely negative, or tinged with so much sarcasm that it's impossible to judge what point she is trying to make. Well, except for the fact that she is very bitter about her experiences with 'Wired' magazine. That comes across loud and clear.

Although the book is read by someone other than the author, the reader accurately portrays the author's love of her own voice. She comes across as one of those people who take five minutes to say something that needs a sentence at most. Not only is she addicted to adjectives and labels, but she seems to be on a mission to see how many can fit in one run-on sentence. If you doubt this, just read the book's title and description. This makes it really hard to follow, or understand, what the author is trying express. So much so, that I had to concentrate more on focusing on listening to the book, rather than watching the road.

How unremarkable is this book? Consider the fact that not once, not twice, but three times my iPod reset to a previous chapter, and it was nearly 10 minutes before I realized that I had already listened to that chapter.

Sadly, it seems that the best books on cyber-culture remain solely in print, and not in Audible form. If you are looking for a 10 hour rant on the soul of the internet and technology, this is certainly one point of view. Just not the most accurate or well-

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

11 people found this helpful

Fear-based and confused

If only one thing, Borsook does succeed in capturing the ambivalence and flat-out fear that many (at least from the media) have voiced about technologies such as the Internet. Her treatment of the subject, however, is fear-based, and as such is confused and hippocritical.

Her credentials for criticism seems to be attending several high-tech industry conventions and being a contributing writer for Wired Magazine (which by her own admittance is more about style than substance). In her defense she claims "but some of my best friends are geeks". As comforting (or as disturbing) as it is to imagine that a "friend of geeks" could write such a scathing indictment of their industry, Borsook's writing shows that she is far far from an Insider. From the very first go, she takes a narrow and short-sighted view of high tech by concentrating only on the manic dot-com boom of the Silicon Valley, as if the Net was not a global phenomenon. She confuses the business MBA's (the Steve Job's) that head the High-Tech companies, whom she slaps with the label "Technolibertarians", with the geeks (the Wozniak's) who actually create the technology, and indeed who are motivated by tinkerer's passion for playing with technology and not money. She make ad hominem attacks such as: all geeks/nerds/tech-works (apparently seeing no difference) suffer from lack of social skills, believe blindly in technology, are given to sexual perversity, and are either "raver" hippies or chauvinist "gilders". These are so off the mark as to not to even deserve further mention.

Another point of irritance is her self-contradiction. Her indictment of technolibertarians centers mainly around their focus on profit as an end. And yet, through other chapters, she measures the success of females and the capacity of charity given by that very standard! Also annoying, Borsook detours midway on a tangent, whining about how her former employer Wired is evil and chauvinist.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Insightful, compelling

What did you love best about Cyberselfish?

This book so perfectly describes the cult of libertarianism, which I have only become fully aware of in the past five or 6 years. As a computer programmer I see her narrative playing-out before my very eyes on a daily basis, yet I had no idea that the tech industry was so utterly saturated with it. Over the past 15 years I've encountered libertarians in tech who wouldn't have to tell me they were libertarian, they'd just start popping-off with some anti-government conspiracy theory garbage and it would be obvious. In many cases it wasn't until years later that I started connecting the libertarian dots. This book tied everything up succinctly.

Also, Paula Parker did a fine job of narrating the book.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful