Statistic-centered textbook, not audio-friendly.

I loved Malcom Gladwell's Talking to Strangers, and found this book through that. Make no mistake! They are NOTHING alike. I *might* be able to become engaged with this book in written form, perhaps showing the chart visuals one would normally see on research outcomes. And one *might* love this book if they can hear and remember a bunch of statistical numbers and piece together some kind of story in their head. But if I could give the "story" rating zero stars I would, because there simply doesn't seem to be anything here humans would label a story --but I'm also returning this purchase after trying desperately to get into the first 3 chapters. There are some intriguing theory titles he seems to be exploring, and the narration voice is fine, but the content is too dry for my ears.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A well written book for a very specific audience

I loved the premise for the book, I expected to get better at delivering clear messages to those around me, while understanding when those around me might be trying to deceive me. Overall, I believe my expectations were met. There were great takeaways that will spice up coffee table conversations and reduce the urge to default to mistrust, and more critically evaluate my communications with others. However, the book reads like a textbook at times, and will require some understanding of basic statistics to fully appreciate the research discussions. The experiments were many, but puts the ownership on the reader to bridge the gap to real life application, outside of criminal confessions. I would have preferred to see more problem statements in advance of an experiment. Statements like, “How do you know if a friend is lying to you?” instead of “Experiment 14” would help connect the research to real world applications in personal and professional settings. If you have interest in the subject of deception, especially if you are an interrogator, this book will serve you well.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Good book - really bad narrator

I could only listen to the first chapter, the narrator sounded like a bored substitute teacher.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Thorough

Very thorough and leading edge. This book provides a very good framework on how to think about lying.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

I can't believe how much I learned

just an amazing book. I actually listened to it twice so that I could really understand it. it's a bit technical but it sort of has to be. it really explained a lot about deception that I never would have known otherwise. much of what we think we know about deception is just folktales. Professor Levine really approaches it with a scientific perspective. he unravels a lot of mysteries and makes this all understandable. it is really really eye-opening.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Awesome book, don’t recommend audiobook version.

The book is amazing. However, I don’t think the audio version does it justice because the reader spends a bunch of time explaining graphs and concepts that aren’t easily understood without being able to see the tables and charts.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

The insularity of fraud

I am an avid reader and this is the most interesting book I have read in 20 years. I was fascinating.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

A Modern Allegory of the Cave

This book enfolds two stories into one. One story is an explanation and defense of TDT — “truth-default theory” — whose starting point is that in everyday discourse we assume our fellow interlocutors are telling the truth. It is only under the pressure of evidence to the contrary that we suspect we are being told a lie. Research into lie detection based on this premise has led Levine to a number of corollaries, including that the prevailing sociological approach to lie-detection, “cue-theory,” has been barking up the wrong tree for a very long time. In short, as Levine puts it, lie detection is less like Freud (trying to read hidden thoughts off of involuntary cues) and more like Sherlock Holmes (collecting evidence from a variety of sources, including well-framed questions).

The second story is just as, if not more, interesting. It is a modern day re-telling of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. The sociological sub-discipline of deception theory has for decades been trapped in a cave of its own making: that we are awash in a sea of liars, that lie-detection is a matter of interpreting cues, and that at best we can achieve accuracy in lie detection at a rate only slightly higher than chance. In spite of, or because of, the discipline’s inability to reach anything of a consensus, researchers only dug the cave deeper trying to justify their own shadows. Levine, assisted in great part by a once student now fellow scholar, plays the role of the philosopher who discovers the light and now wants to free his fellow scholars from their self-imposed imprisonment.

What I find most intriguing, and disconcerting, about the book is how much time, dedication and sheer intellectual effort it took to make what in the end turns out to be rather common-sensical observations: we have to assume truth-telling to function as a society, and humans are not mind-readers — we need to exercise our rational powers in light of evidence to detect deception. It is rather unsettling to see how an entire field of scholarship so enveloped itself in a labyrinthian set of false assumptions that it requires this amount of research and effort to escape.

I am not a sociologist, and never even knew that this sub-discipline existed until I listened to this book, but Levine’s conclusions by and large resonate with lived experience. I think I disagree, however, with his argument that most people are truth-tellers most of time. I also don’t think that proposition is necessary for his theory. However, I want to purchase the print edition to review his arguments more carefully before committing myself to this objection. My sense is that Levine’s anthropology (his understanding of human nature) is too superficial to give a full account of how, when and why people lie. He is correct though, and students of Thomas Aquinas have known this for centuries, that when people lie they do so because they believe it will achieve something they perceive as good.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

5 people found this helpful

Educational and ground breaking

This book is one of the most important things I’ve read. If you’re looking for pure entertainment, this isn’t the book for you. Duped is closer to a Communications text book on deception detection research than your typical informational non fiction read. If you read this book understanding that, you’ll understand its amazing value.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

fascinating book and great narration

I came to this book by way of Malcolm Gladwell's "Talking to Strangers" and I'm so glad I did! Dr. Levine's approach is incredibly thorough but still very accessible to a layperson like me. I was given this audiobook for free in exchange for an honest review. Speaking candidly, this is a must-listen for anyone interested in the science of deception.
Also, special shout out to the narrator-- he carries you through a lot of very complex concepts, relayed in great detail, in a way that is dynamic and compelling enough to maintain rapt interest. Very well read and well done all together.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

5 people found this helpful