FBI Snitches, Blackmail, and Obscene Ethics at the Supreme Court Audiobook By Alex Charns cover art

FBI Snitches, Blackmail, and Obscene Ethics at the Supreme Court

Plus: How it took Thirteen years and Three FOIA lawsuits to get the FBI's Secret Supreme Court Sex and Informant Files

Virtual Voice Sample
Try for $0.00
Access a growing selection of included Audible Originals, audiobooks, and podcasts.
You will get an email reminder before your trial ends.
Audible Plus auto-renews for $7.95/mo after 30 days. Upgrade or cancel anytime.

FBI Snitches, Blackmail, and Obscene Ethics at the Supreme Court

By: Alex Charns
Narrated by: Virtual Voice
Try for $0.00

$7.95 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $3.99

Buy for $3.99

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel
Background images

This title uses virtual voice narration

Virtual voice is computer-generated narration for audiobooks.

About this listen

It took over thirteen years and three Freedom of Information lawsuits to get proof that the FBI sexually blackmailed Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas. Justice Fortas was already compromised by leaking information to the FBI about pending electronic surveillance cases. This was the most egregious violation of judicial ethics in Court history. The proof was hidden from Senate investigators, journalists, historians, and FOIA requesters for decades. The book contains an FBI document Appendix containing files from J. Edgar Hoover's Official and Confidential files.

A follow-up to Cloak and Gavel. FBI Wiretaps, Bugs, Informers, and the Supreme Court (Univ. of Illinois 1992). "The FBI's scandalous techniques ranged from illegal wiretapping to disinformation campaigns, to using Justice Abe Fortas as a Bureau informant." Harvard Law Review, Vol 106, p. 812. "Cloak and Gavel" . . . is the product of an eight-year struggle to force the FBI to reveal its Supreme Court snooping. Charns got . . . hard evidence that Hoover attempted to monitor the court's private deliberations and manipulate some of the justices." Wall Street Journal, A13, 9/1/92. "[A] bonanza of Supreme Court history, providing depth and perspective to some great cases of our time." St Louis Post-Dispatch, 10/18/92.

(Feb. 20, 2024, Edition)
Americas Law Political Science Politics & Government United States
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup

What listeners say about FBI Snitches, Blackmail, and Obscene Ethics at the Supreme Court

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.