Hollingsworth v. Perry Audiobook By The Supreme Court of the United States cover art

Hollingsworth v. Perry

Preview
Try for $0.00
Prime logo Prime members: New to Audible?
Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Hollingsworth v. Perry

By: The Supreme Court of the United States
Narrated by: uncredited
Try for $0.00

$14.95/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $1.95

Buy for $1.95

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use, License, and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel

About this listen

In 2000, the citizens of California passed Proposition 22, which affirmed a legal understanding that marriage was a union between one man and one woman. In 2008, the California Supreme Court held that the California Constitution required the term “marriage” to include the union of same-sex couples and invalidated Proposition 22. Later in 2008, California citizens passed Proposition 8, which amended the California Constitution to provide that “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized by California.” The respondents, a gay couple and a lesbian couple, sued the state officials responsible for the enforcement of California’s marriage laws and claimed that Proposition 8 violated their Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection of the law. When the state officials originally named in the suit informed the district court that they could not defend Proposition 8, the petitioners, official proponents of the measure, intervened to defend it. The district court held that Proposition 8 violated the Constitution, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

Public Domain (P)2014 Oyez, Inc
Political Science Politics & Government
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
All stars
Most relevant  
I should have been far longer. The opinions of the court are missing. The lawyers arguments can't all be there. I'm very disappointed.

Quite a bit missing

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.