-
Injustices
- The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted
- Narrated by: Joe Barrett
- Length: 10 hrs and 14 mins
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Buy for $15.47
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Publisher's summary
Few American institutions have inflicted greater suffering on ordinary people than the Supreme Court of the United States. Since its inception the justices of the Supreme Court have shaped a nation where children toiled in coal mines, where Americans could be forced into camps because of their race, and where a woman could be sterilized against her will by state law.
In this powerful indictment of a venerated institution, Ian Millhiser tells the history of the Supreme Court through the eyes of the everyday people who have suffered the most from it. America ratified three constitutional amendments to provide equal rights to freed slaves, but the justices spent 30 years largely dismantling these amendments. Then they spent the next 40 years rewriting them into a shield for the wealthy and the powerful. In Injustices, Millhiser argues that the Supreme Court has seized power for itself that rightfully belongs to the people's elected representatives and has bent the arc of American history away from justice.
Listeners also enjoyed...
-
The Agenda
- How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America
- By: Ian Millhiser
- Narrated by: David H. Lawrence
- Length: 3 hrs and 42 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, tells the story of what the six very conservative Republicans Supreme Court justices are likely to do with their power. The Agenda exposes a radically altered Supreme Court whose powers extend far beyond transforming any individual right - its agenda is to shape the very nature of America's government, redefining who gets to have legal rights, who is beyond the reach of the law, and who chooses the people who make our laws.
-
-
short but informative
- By Matt Gilbert on 10-04-21
By: Ian Millhiser
-
Prequel
- An American Fight Against Fascism
- By: Rachel Maddow
- Narrated by: Rachel Maddow
- Length: 13 hrs and 9 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Inspired by her research for the hit podcast Ultra, Rachel Maddow charts the rise of a wild American strain of authoritarianism that has been alive on the far-right edge of our politics for the better part of a century. Before and even after our troops had begun fighting abroad in World War II, a clandestine network flooded the country with disinformation aimed at sapping the strength of the U.S. war effort and persuading Americans that our natural alliance was with the Axis, not against it.
-
-
The fight to keep democracy alive
- By Rex on 10-19-23
By: Rachel Maddow
-
Allow Me to Retort
- A Black Guy's Guide to the Constitution
- By: Elie Mystal
- Narrated by: Elie Mystal
- Length: 8 hrs and 59 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
This is an easily digestible argument about what rights we have, what rights Republicans are trying to take away, and how to stop them. Mystal explains how to protect the rights of women and people of color instead of cowering to the absolutism of gun owners and bigots. He explains the legal way to stop everything from police brutality to political gerrymandering, just by changing a few judges and justices. He strips out all of the fancy jargon conservatives like to hide behind and lays bare the truth of their project to keep America forever tethered to its slaveholding past.
-
-
Informative and Entertaining
- By Kindle Customer on 03-06-22
By: Elie Mystal
-
The Scheme
- How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court
- By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Jennifer Mueller
- Narrated by: Charles Constant
- Length: 8 hrs and 1 min
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Following his book Captured on corporate capture of regulatory and government agencies, and his years of experience as a prosecutor, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse here turns his attention to the right-wing scheme to capture the courts, and how it influenced the Trump administration's appointment of over 230 "business-friendly" judges, including the last three justices of the United States Supreme Court.
-
-
Dysfunctional democracy explained
- By Mark on 10-25-22
By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, and others
-
The Shadow Docket
- How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic
- By: Stephen Vladeck
- Narrated by: Jonathan Todd Ross
- Length: 11 hrs and 17 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The Supreme Court has always had the authority to issue emergency rulings in exceptional circumstances. But since 2017, the Court has dramatically expanded its use of the behind-the-scenes “shadow docket,” regularly making decisions that affect millions of Americans without public hearings and without explanation, through cryptic late-night rulings that leave lawyers—and citizens—scrambling. But Americans of all political stripes should be worried about what the shadow docket portends for the rule of law, argues Supreme Court expert Stephen Vladeck.
-
-
Where was Vladeck?
- By SorenKMiller on 05-25-23
By: Stephen Vladeck
-
Justice Is Coming
- How Progressives Are Going to Take Over the Country and America Is Going to Love It
- By: Cenk Uygur
- Narrated by: Cenk Uygur
- Length: 12 hrs and 40 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The media can't stop talking about the gridlock in Washington, as if a handful of stubborn Republicans are the only thing standing between us and a fully-functional democracy. The reality is that our government was taken over by big business and their allies in both political parties. The getaway driver in this heist was corporate media. The good news is that the American people are very progressive. And soon progressives will take over Washington as well! And when they do, the great majority of Americans will love it.
-
-
Much better than expected
- By Tracy B on 09-23-23
By: Cenk Uygur
-
The Agenda
- How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America
- By: Ian Millhiser
- Narrated by: David H. Lawrence
- Length: 3 hrs and 42 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, tells the story of what the six very conservative Republicans Supreme Court justices are likely to do with their power. The Agenda exposes a radically altered Supreme Court whose powers extend far beyond transforming any individual right - its agenda is to shape the very nature of America's government, redefining who gets to have legal rights, who is beyond the reach of the law, and who chooses the people who make our laws.
-
-
short but informative
- By Matt Gilbert on 10-04-21
By: Ian Millhiser
-
Prequel
- An American Fight Against Fascism
- By: Rachel Maddow
- Narrated by: Rachel Maddow
- Length: 13 hrs and 9 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Inspired by her research for the hit podcast Ultra, Rachel Maddow charts the rise of a wild American strain of authoritarianism that has been alive on the far-right edge of our politics for the better part of a century. Before and even after our troops had begun fighting abroad in World War II, a clandestine network flooded the country with disinformation aimed at sapping the strength of the U.S. war effort and persuading Americans that our natural alliance was with the Axis, not against it.
-
-
The fight to keep democracy alive
- By Rex on 10-19-23
By: Rachel Maddow
-
Allow Me to Retort
- A Black Guy's Guide to the Constitution
- By: Elie Mystal
- Narrated by: Elie Mystal
- Length: 8 hrs and 59 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
This is an easily digestible argument about what rights we have, what rights Republicans are trying to take away, and how to stop them. Mystal explains how to protect the rights of women and people of color instead of cowering to the absolutism of gun owners and bigots. He explains the legal way to stop everything from police brutality to political gerrymandering, just by changing a few judges and justices. He strips out all of the fancy jargon conservatives like to hide behind and lays bare the truth of their project to keep America forever tethered to its slaveholding past.
-
-
Informative and Entertaining
- By Kindle Customer on 03-06-22
By: Elie Mystal
-
The Scheme
- How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court
- By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Jennifer Mueller
- Narrated by: Charles Constant
- Length: 8 hrs and 1 min
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Following his book Captured on corporate capture of regulatory and government agencies, and his years of experience as a prosecutor, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse here turns his attention to the right-wing scheme to capture the courts, and how it influenced the Trump administration's appointment of over 230 "business-friendly" judges, including the last three justices of the United States Supreme Court.
-
-
Dysfunctional democracy explained
- By Mark on 10-25-22
By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, and others
-
The Shadow Docket
- How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic
- By: Stephen Vladeck
- Narrated by: Jonathan Todd Ross
- Length: 11 hrs and 17 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The Supreme Court has always had the authority to issue emergency rulings in exceptional circumstances. But since 2017, the Court has dramatically expanded its use of the behind-the-scenes “shadow docket,” regularly making decisions that affect millions of Americans without public hearings and without explanation, through cryptic late-night rulings that leave lawyers—and citizens—scrambling. But Americans of all political stripes should be worried about what the shadow docket portends for the rule of law, argues Supreme Court expert Stephen Vladeck.
-
-
Where was Vladeck?
- By SorenKMiller on 05-25-23
By: Stephen Vladeck
-
Justice Is Coming
- How Progressives Are Going to Take Over the Country and America Is Going to Love It
- By: Cenk Uygur
- Narrated by: Cenk Uygur
- Length: 12 hrs and 40 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The media can't stop talking about the gridlock in Washington, as if a handful of stubborn Republicans are the only thing standing between us and a fully-functional democracy. The reality is that our government was taken over by big business and their allies in both political parties. The getaway driver in this heist was corporate media. The good news is that the American people are very progressive. And soon progressives will take over Washington as well! And when they do, the great majority of Americans will love it.
-
-
Much better than expected
- By Tracy B on 09-23-23
By: Cenk Uygur
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- By: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrated by: Daniel Henning
- Length: 7 hrs and 9 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- By Amy Eaton on 03-17-23
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- Why American Democracy Reached the Breaking Point
- By: Steven Levitsky, Daniel Ziblatt
- Narrated by: Fred Sanders
- Length: 8 hrs and 49 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
America is undergoing a massive experiment: It is moving, in fits and starts, toward a multiracial democracy, something few societies have ever done. But the prospect of change has sparked an authoritarian backlash that threatens the very foundations of our political system. Why is democracy under assault here, and not in other wealthy, diversifying nations? And what can we do to save it?
-
-
Tyranny of the Minority
- By orders on 10-07-23
By: Steven Levitsky, and others
-
White Rage
- The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide
- By: Carol Anderson
- Narrated by: Pamela Gibson
- Length: 6 hrs and 5 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
As Ferguson, Missouri, erupted in August 2014 and media commentators across the ideological spectrum referred to the angry response of African Americans as 'Black rage', historian Carol Anderson wrote a remarkable op-ed in the Washington Post showing that this was, instead, 'white rage at work. With so much attention on the flames,' she wrote, 'everyone had ignored the kindling.'
-
-
Good History, Was Hoping For More Insight
- By Mike on 09-08-16
By: Carol Anderson
-
The Supermajority
- How the Supreme Court Divided America
- By: Michael Waldman
- Narrated by: Robertson Dean, Michael Waldman - introduction
- Length: 11 hrs and 15 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In The Supermajority, Michael Waldman explores the tumultuous 2021–2022 Supreme Court term. He draws deeply on history to examine other times the Court veered from the popular will, provoking controversy, and backlash. And he analyzes the most important new rulings and their implications for the law and for American society. Waldman asks: What can we do when the Supreme Court challenges the country?
-
-
This should be a serialized media presentation, for the return of some normalization of the Supreme Court.
- By Elaine on 06-08-23
By: Michael Waldman
-
Myth America
- Historians Take On the Biggest Legends and Lies About Our Past
- By: Kevin M. Kruse, Julian E. Zelizer
- Narrated by: Allan Aquino, Maleah Woodley, Todd Menesses, and others
- Length: 12 hrs and 55 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The United States is in the grip of a crisis of bad history. Distortions of the past promoted in the conservative media have led large numbers of Americans to believe in fictions over facts, making constructive dialogue impossible and imperiling our democracy. In Myth America, Kevin M. Kruse and Julian E. Zelizer have assembled an all-star team of fellow historians to push back against this misinformation.
-
-
Right Wing Bashing book!! Aka a History Book
- By amy on 02-08-23
By: Kevin M. Kruse, and others
-
The Great Dissent
- How Oliver Wendell Holmes Changed His Mind and Changed the History of Free Speech in America
- By: Thomas Healy
- Narrated by: Danny Campbell
- Length: 10 hrs and 20 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Free speech as we know it comes less from the First Amendment than from a most unexpected source: Supreme Court justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. A lifelong skeptic, he disdained all individual rights, including the right to express one's political views. But in 1919, it was Holmes who wrote a dissenting opinion that would become the canonical affirmation of free speech in the United States.
-
-
How a 78 year old man can learn & change his mind
- By Jean on 09-23-13
By: Thomas Healy
-
Nine Black Robes
- Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences
- By: Joan Biskupic
- Narrated by: Kirsten Potter
- Length: 13 hrs and 11 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
CNN Senior Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic provides an urgent and inside look at the history-making era in the Supreme Court during the Trump and post-Trump years, from its seismic shift to the Right to its controversial decisions, including its reversal of Roe v. Wade, based on access to all the key players.
-
-
Another 3 star effort from Biskupic
- By Richard Spitaleri Jr. on 04-16-23
By: Joan Biskupic
-
Supreme Inequality
- The Supreme Court's Fifty-Year Battle for a More Unjust America
- By: Adam Cohen
- Narrated by: Dan Woren
- Length: 14 hrs and 16 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In Supreme Inequality, best-selling author Adam Cohen surveys the most significant Supreme Court rulings since the Nixon era and exposes how, contrary to what Americans like to believe, the Supreme Court does little to protect the rights of the poor and disadvantaged; in fact, it has not been on their side for 50 years. Cohen proves beyond doubt that the modern Court has been one of the leading forces behind the nation’s soaring level of economic inequality, and that an institution revered as a source of fairness has been systematically making America less fair.
-
-
A real eye opener!
- By alohathere on 05-28-20
By: Adam Cohen
-
Why We Did It
- A Travelogue from the Republican Road to Hell
- By: Tim Miller
- Narrated by: Josh Bloomberg
- Length: 8 hrs and 14 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
As one of the strategists behind the famous 2012 RNC “autopsy,” Miller conducts his own forensic study on the pungent carcass of the party he used to love, cutting into all the hubris, ambition, idiocy, desperation, and self-deception for everyone to see. In a bracingly honest reflection on both his own past work for the Republican Party and the contortions of his former peers in the GOP establishment, Miller draws a straight line between the actions of the 2000s GOP to the Republican political class's Trumpian takeover, including the horrors of January 6th.
-
-
No, Tim!
- By Lori Renard on 06-30-22
By: Tim Miller
-
The Meritocracy Trap
- How America's Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite
- By: Daniel Markovits
- Narrated by: Fred Sanders
- Length: 14 hrs and 13 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
It is an axiom of American life that advantage should be earned through ability and effort. Even as the country divides itself at every turn, the meritocratic ideal - that social and economic rewards should follow achievement rather than breeding - reigns supreme. Both Democrats and Republicans insistently repeat meritocratic notions. Meritocracy cuts to the heart of who we are. It sustains the American dream.
-
-
A well-argued theory
- By Fountain of Chris on 09-20-19
By: Daniel Markovits
-
Scorpions
- The Battles and Triumphs of FDR's Great Supreme Court Justices
- By: Noah Feldman
- Narrated by: Cotter Smith
- Length: 14 hrs and 38 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
They began as close allies and friends of FDR, but the quest to shape a new Constitution led them to competition and sometimes outright warfare. Scorpions tells the story of four great justices: their relationship with Roosevelt, with each other, and with the turbulent world of the Great Depression, World War II, and the Cold War. It also serves as a history of the modern Constitution itself.
-
-
A MOST HONOURABLE SWANSONG
- By Dudley H. Williams on 05-27-12
By: Noah Feldman
-
We Are Not Yet Equal
- Understanding Our Racial Divide
- By: Carol Anderson, Tonya Bolden
- Narrated by: Robin Miles
- Length: 6 hrs and 42 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Carol Anderson's White Rage took the world by storm, landing on the New York Times best seller list and best book of the year lists from New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, and Chicago Review of Books. It launched her as an in-demand commentator on contemporary race issues for national print and television media and garnered her an invitation to speak to the Democratic Congressional Caucus. This compelling young adult adaptation brings her ideas to a new audience.
-
-
Great
- By JD on 07-06-20
By: Carol Anderson, and others
Critic reviews
Related to this topic
-
We Are Not Yet Equal
- Understanding Our Racial Divide
- By: Carol Anderson, Tonya Bolden
- Narrated by: Robin Miles
- Length: 6 hrs and 42 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Carol Anderson's White Rage took the world by storm, landing on the New York Times best seller list and best book of the year lists from New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, and Chicago Review of Books. It launched her as an in-demand commentator on contemporary race issues for national print and television media and garnered her an invitation to speak to the Democratic Congressional Caucus. This compelling young adult adaptation brings her ideas to a new audience.
-
-
Great
- By JD on 07-06-20
By: Carol Anderson, and others
-
A People's History of the Supreme Court
- The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution
- By: Peter Irons, Howard Zinn - foreword
- Narrated by: David Drummond
- Length: 28 hrs and 32 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
A comprehensive history of the people and cases that have changed history, this is the definitive account of the nation's highest court.
-
-
Really enjoyed this book
- By Paul on 02-19-20
By: Peter Irons, and others
-
White Rage
- The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide
- By: Carol Anderson
- Narrated by: Pamela Gibson
- Length: 6 hrs and 5 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
As Ferguson, Missouri, erupted in August 2014 and media commentators across the ideological spectrum referred to the angry response of African Americans as 'Black rage', historian Carol Anderson wrote a remarkable op-ed in the Washington Post showing that this was, instead, 'white rage at work. With so much attention on the flames,' she wrote, 'everyone had ignored the kindling.'
-
-
Good History, Was Hoping For More Insight
- By Mike on 09-08-16
By: Carol Anderson
-
Lies the Government Told You
- Myth, Power, and Deception in American History
- By: Andrew P. Napolitano
- Narrated by: Andrew Napolitano
- Length: 11 hrs and 53 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In Lies the Government Told You, Judge Andrew P. Napolitano reveals how America's freedom, as guaranteed by the US Constitution, has been forfeited by a government more protective of its own power than its obligations to preserve our individual liberties.
-
-
A Must Read America 🇺🇸
- By Jamie Schaible on 05-30-23
-
The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History
- By: Thomas E. Woods Jr.
- Narrated by: Barrett Whitener
- Length: 8 hrs and 4 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Everything, well, almost everything, you know about American history is wrong because most textbooks and popular history books are written by left-wing academic historians who treat their biases as fact. But fear not; Professor Thomas Woods refutes the popular myths in The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History.
-
-
Highly recommended! Not for the faint of heart!
- By RAC on 12-12-05
-
Our Lost Constitution
- The Willful Subversion of America's Founding Document
- By: Mike Lee
- Narrated by: Mike Lee, Tom Parks
- Length: 6 hrs and 41 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Senator Mike Lee tells the dramatic, little-known stories behind six of the Constitution's most indispensable provisions. He shows their rise. He shows their fall. And he makes vividly clear how nearly every abuse of federal power today is rooted in neglect of this Lost Constitution.
-
-
Solution is a bit naive
- By Will on 08-07-16
By: Mike Lee
-
We Are Not Yet Equal
- Understanding Our Racial Divide
- By: Carol Anderson, Tonya Bolden
- Narrated by: Robin Miles
- Length: 6 hrs and 42 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Carol Anderson's White Rage took the world by storm, landing on the New York Times best seller list and best book of the year lists from New York Times, Washington Post, Boston Globe, and Chicago Review of Books. It launched her as an in-demand commentator on contemporary race issues for national print and television media and garnered her an invitation to speak to the Democratic Congressional Caucus. This compelling young adult adaptation brings her ideas to a new audience.
-
-
Great
- By JD on 07-06-20
By: Carol Anderson, and others
-
A People's History of the Supreme Court
- The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution
- By: Peter Irons, Howard Zinn - foreword
- Narrated by: David Drummond
- Length: 28 hrs and 32 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
A comprehensive history of the people and cases that have changed history, this is the definitive account of the nation's highest court.
-
-
Really enjoyed this book
- By Paul on 02-19-20
By: Peter Irons, and others
-
White Rage
- The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide
- By: Carol Anderson
- Narrated by: Pamela Gibson
- Length: 6 hrs and 5 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
As Ferguson, Missouri, erupted in August 2014 and media commentators across the ideological spectrum referred to the angry response of African Americans as 'Black rage', historian Carol Anderson wrote a remarkable op-ed in the Washington Post showing that this was, instead, 'white rage at work. With so much attention on the flames,' she wrote, 'everyone had ignored the kindling.'
-
-
Good History, Was Hoping For More Insight
- By Mike on 09-08-16
By: Carol Anderson
-
Lies the Government Told You
- Myth, Power, and Deception in American History
- By: Andrew P. Napolitano
- Narrated by: Andrew Napolitano
- Length: 11 hrs and 53 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In Lies the Government Told You, Judge Andrew P. Napolitano reveals how America's freedom, as guaranteed by the US Constitution, has been forfeited by a government more protective of its own power than its obligations to preserve our individual liberties.
-
-
A Must Read America 🇺🇸
- By Jamie Schaible on 05-30-23
-
The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History
- By: Thomas E. Woods Jr.
- Narrated by: Barrett Whitener
- Length: 8 hrs and 4 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Everything, well, almost everything, you know about American history is wrong because most textbooks and popular history books are written by left-wing academic historians who treat their biases as fact. But fear not; Professor Thomas Woods refutes the popular myths in The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History.
-
-
Highly recommended! Not for the faint of heart!
- By RAC on 12-12-05
-
Our Lost Constitution
- The Willful Subversion of America's Founding Document
- By: Mike Lee
- Narrated by: Mike Lee, Tom Parks
- Length: 6 hrs and 41 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Senator Mike Lee tells the dramatic, little-known stories behind six of the Constitution's most indispensable provisions. He shows their rise. He shows their fall. And he makes vividly clear how nearly every abuse of federal power today is rooted in neglect of this Lost Constitution.
-
-
Solution is a bit naive
- By Will on 08-07-16
By: Mike Lee
-
Theodore and Woodrow
- How Two American Presidents Destroyed Constitutional Freedom
- By: Andrew Napolitano
- Narrated by: Scott Moore
- Length: 10 hrs and 27 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
A harsh and revealing political exposé of two beloved presidents. Judge Andrew P. Napolitano reveals how Teddy Roosevelt, a bully, and Woodrow Wilson, a constitutional scholar, each pushed aside the Constitution’s restrictions on the federal government and used it as an instrument to redistribute wealth, regulate personal behavior, and enrich the government. Theodore and Woodrow exposes two of our nation’s most beloved presidents and how they helped speed the Progressive cause on its merry way.
-
-
The Case Against Theodore and Woodrow...
- By Joseph D. Klotz on 03-12-13
-
Supreme Power
- 7 Pivotal Supreme Court Decisions That Had a Major Impact on America
- By: Ted Stewart
- Narrated by: Art Allen
- Length: 7 hrs and 40 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Best-selling author Ted Stewart explains how the Supreme Court and its nine appointed members now stand at a crucial point in their power to hand down momentous and far-ranging decisions. Today's Court affects every major area of American life, from health care to civil rights, from abortion to marriage. This fascinating book reveals the complex history of the Court as told through seven pivotal decisions.
-
-
Polemical, downright ridiculous at times
- By Joe Igla on 11-04-17
By: Ted Stewart
-
The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution: 1763-1789
- By: Robert Middlekauff
- Narrated by: Robert Fass
- Length: 26 hrs and 56 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The first book to appear in the illustrious Oxford History of the United States, this critically-acclaimed volume - a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize - offers an unsurpassed history of the Revolutionary War and the birth of the American republic.
-
-
Strong History Rich With Behind The Scenes Details
- By John on 10-06-11
-
The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition
- The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life
- By: Michael G. Trachtman
- Narrated by: Jonathan Yen
- Length: 7 hrs and 20 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The Supreme Court's rulings have shaped American life and justice and allowed Americans to retain basic freedoms such as privacy, free speech, and the right to a fair trial. This revised and updated edition of Michael G. Trachtman's riveting work includes 10 important cases from 2010 to 2015.
-
-
Nice review overall.
- By "freeindeed4ever" on 02-10-20
-
Louis D. Brandeis
- A Life
- By: Melvin I Urofsky
- Narrated by: Sean Pratt
- Length: 35 hrs and 13 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The first full-scale biography in 25 years of one of the most important and distinguished justices to sit on the Supreme Court - an audiobook that reveals Louis D. Brandeis the reformer, lawyer, and jurist, and Brandeis the man, in all of his complexity, passion, and wit. As a lawyer in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, he pioneered how modern law is practiced.
-
-
a Listen to Louis D. Brandeis
- By J on 07-11-10
By: Melvin I Urofsky
-
Lincoln on Leadership for Today
- Abraham Lincoln's Approach to Twenty-First-Century Issues
- By: Donald T. Phillips
- Narrated by: Donald T. Phillips
- Length: 10 hrs and 10 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The author of the classic best seller Lincoln on Leadership answers the question: How would President Lincoln handle the pressing crises of our modern world? Abraham Lincoln is recognized as one of history's finest leaders, a great president when the United States was under tremendous strain. But suppose he were alive today. How would Lincoln deal with today's high-pressure issues, from politics to business?
-
-
Leveraging Lincoln to drive a personal agenda
- By J on 07-18-17
-
Gunfight
- The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America
- By: Adam Winkler
- Narrated by: John McLain
- Length: 12 hrs and 53 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
A provocative history that reveals how guns - not abortion, race, or religion - are at the heart of America's cultural divide. Gunfight promises to be a seminal work in its examination of America's four-centuries-long political battle over gun control and the right to bear arms. Adam Winkler uses the landmark 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, which invalidated a law banning handguns in the nation's capital, as a springboard for a groundbreaking historical narrative.
-
-
Excellent, well researched and thought provoking.
- By wesley felice on 04-02-18
By: Adam Winkler
-
A Short History of the United States
- By: Robert V. Remini
- Narrated by: Oliver Wyman
- Length: 10 hrs and 18 mins
- Abridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In addition, Remini explains the reasons for the nation's unique and enduring strengths, its artistic and cultural accomplishments, its genius in developing new products to sell to the world, and its abiding commitment to individual freedoms.
-
-
Very thorough, easy listen, heavy on US Presidents
- By Craig on 01-02-09
By: Robert V. Remini
-
A History of America in Ten Strikes
- By: Erik Loomis
- Narrated by: Brian Troxell
- Length: 9 hrs and 17 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Powerful and accessible, A History of America in Ten Strikes challenges all of our contemporary assumptions around labor, unions, and American workers. In this brilliant book, labor historian Erik Loomis recounts ten critical workers’ strikes in American labor history that everyone needs to know about (and then provides an annotated list of the 150 most important moments in American labor history in the appendix).
-
-
great read
- By Perscors on 03-17-19
By: Erik Loomis
-
The Real Lincoln
- A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War
- By: Thomas J. Dilorenzo
- Narrated by: Charles Constant
- Length: 8 hrs and 32 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Most Americans consider Abraham Lincoln to be the greatest president in history. His legend as the Great Emancipator has grown to mythic proportions as hundreds of books, a national holiday, and a monument in Washington, D.C., extol his heroism and martyrdom. But what if most everything you knew about Lincoln were false? What if, instead of an American hero who sought to free the slaves, Lincoln were in fact a calculating politician who waged the bloodiest war in American history in order to build an empire that rivaled Great Britain's?
-
-
OpEd Disguised as History
- By John McDowell on 10-30-18
-
Black Reconstruction in America
- By: W. E. B. Du Bois, David Levering Lewis
- Narrated by: Mirron Willis
- Length: 37 hrs and 26 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
This pioneering work was the first full-length study of the role black Americans played in the crucial period after the Civil War, when the slaves had been freed and the attempt was made to reconstruct American society. Hailed at the time, Black Reconstruction in America has justly been called a classic.
-
-
The textbook you should have had in high school.
- By Saleh on 05-06-18
By: W. E. B. Du Bois, and others
-
9 Presidents Who Screwed Up America
- And Four Who Tried to Save Her
- By: Brion McClanahan
- Narrated by: Mike Chamberlain
- Length: 11 hrs and 30 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Of the 44 presidents who have led the United States, nine made mistakes that permanently scarred the nation. Which nine? Brion McClanahan, author of The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Founding Fathers and The Founding Fathers' Guide to the Constitution, will surprise listeners with his list, which he supports with exhaustive and entertaining evidence.
-
-
Political opinion without substance.
- By Ella's Dad on 04-27-18
By: Brion McClanahan
People who viewed this also viewed...
-
The Agenda
- How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America
- By: Ian Millhiser
- Narrated by: David H. Lawrence
- Length: 3 hrs and 42 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, tells the story of what the six very conservative Republicans Supreme Court justices are likely to do with their power. The Agenda exposes a radically altered Supreme Court whose powers extend far beyond transforming any individual right - its agenda is to shape the very nature of America's government, redefining who gets to have legal rights, who is beyond the reach of the law, and who chooses the people who make our laws.
-
-
short but informative
- By Matt Gilbert on 10-04-21
By: Ian Millhiser
-
The Scheme
- How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court
- By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Jennifer Mueller
- Narrated by: Charles Constant
- Length: 8 hrs and 1 min
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Following his book Captured on corporate capture of regulatory and government agencies, and his years of experience as a prosecutor, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse here turns his attention to the right-wing scheme to capture the courts, and how it influenced the Trump administration's appointment of over 230 "business-friendly" judges, including the last three justices of the United States Supreme Court.
-
-
Dysfunctional democracy explained
- By Mark on 10-25-22
By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, and others
-
The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition
- The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life
- By: Michael G. Trachtman
- Narrated by: Jonathan Yen
- Length: 7 hrs and 20 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The Supreme Court's rulings have shaped American life and justice and allowed Americans to retain basic freedoms such as privacy, free speech, and the right to a fair trial. This revised and updated edition of Michael G. Trachtman's riveting work includes 10 important cases from 2010 to 2015.
-
-
Nice review overall.
- By "freeindeed4ever" on 02-10-20
-
Nine Black Robes
- Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences
- By: Joan Biskupic
- Narrated by: Kirsten Potter
- Length: 13 hrs and 11 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
CNN Senior Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic provides an urgent and inside look at the history-making era in the Supreme Court during the Trump and post-Trump years, from its seismic shift to the Right to its controversial decisions, including its reversal of Roe v. Wade, based on access to all the key players.
-
-
Another 3 star effort from Biskupic
- By Richard Spitaleri Jr. on 04-16-23
By: Joan Biskupic
-
The Color of Law
- A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America
- By: Richard Rothstein
- Narrated by: Adam Grupper
- Length: 9 hrs and 32 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In this groundbreaking history of the modern American metropolis, Richard Rothstein explodes the myth that America's cities came to be racially divided through de facto segregation - that is, through individual prejudices, income differences, or the actions of private institutions like banks and real estate agencies. Rather, he incontrovertibly makes clear that it was de jure segregation - the laws and policy decisions passed by local, state, and federal governments - that actually promoted the discriminatory patterns that continue to this day.
-
-
Better suited to print than audio
- By ProfGolf on 02-04-18
-
The Supreme Court
- By: William H. Rehnquist
- Narrated by: John Pruden
- Length: 10 hrs and 41 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Chief Justice Rehnquist's engaging writing illuminates both the high and low points in the Court's history, from Chief Justice Marshall's dominance of the Court during the early 19th century through the landmark decisions of the Warren Court. Citing cases such as the Dred Scott decision and Roosevelt's Court-packing plan, Rehnquist makes clear that the Court does not operate in a vacuum, that the justices are unavoidably influenced by their surroundings, and that their decisions have real and lasting impacts on our society.
-
-
Absorbing
- By Jean on 01-28-18
-
The Agenda
- How a Republican Supreme Court Is Reshaping America
- By: Ian Millhiser
- Narrated by: David H. Lawrence
- Length: 3 hrs and 42 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, tells the story of what the six very conservative Republicans Supreme Court justices are likely to do with their power. The Agenda exposes a radically altered Supreme Court whose powers extend far beyond transforming any individual right - its agenda is to shape the very nature of America's government, redefining who gets to have legal rights, who is beyond the reach of the law, and who chooses the people who make our laws.
-
-
short but informative
- By Matt Gilbert on 10-04-21
By: Ian Millhiser
-
The Scheme
- How the Right Wing Used Dark Money to Capture the Supreme Court
- By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Jennifer Mueller
- Narrated by: Charles Constant
- Length: 8 hrs and 1 min
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Following his book Captured on corporate capture of regulatory and government agencies, and his years of experience as a prosecutor, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse here turns his attention to the right-wing scheme to capture the courts, and how it influenced the Trump administration's appointment of over 230 "business-friendly" judges, including the last three justices of the United States Supreme Court.
-
-
Dysfunctional democracy explained
- By Mark on 10-25-22
By: Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, and others
-
The Supremes' Greatest Hits, 2nd Revised & Updated Edition
- The 44 Supreme Court Cases That Most Directly Affect Your Life
- By: Michael G. Trachtman
- Narrated by: Jonathan Yen
- Length: 7 hrs and 20 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The Supreme Court's rulings have shaped American life and justice and allowed Americans to retain basic freedoms such as privacy, free speech, and the right to a fair trial. This revised and updated edition of Michael G. Trachtman's riveting work includes 10 important cases from 2010 to 2015.
-
-
Nice review overall.
- By "freeindeed4ever" on 02-10-20
-
Nine Black Robes
- Inside the Supreme Court's Drive to the Right and Its Historic Consequences
- By: Joan Biskupic
- Narrated by: Kirsten Potter
- Length: 13 hrs and 11 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
CNN Senior Supreme Court Analyst Joan Biskupic provides an urgent and inside look at the history-making era in the Supreme Court during the Trump and post-Trump years, from its seismic shift to the Right to its controversial decisions, including its reversal of Roe v. Wade, based on access to all the key players.
-
-
Another 3 star effort from Biskupic
- By Richard Spitaleri Jr. on 04-16-23
By: Joan Biskupic
-
The Color of Law
- A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America
- By: Richard Rothstein
- Narrated by: Adam Grupper
- Length: 9 hrs and 32 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In this groundbreaking history of the modern American metropolis, Richard Rothstein explodes the myth that America's cities came to be racially divided through de facto segregation - that is, through individual prejudices, income differences, or the actions of private institutions like banks and real estate agencies. Rather, he incontrovertibly makes clear that it was de jure segregation - the laws and policy decisions passed by local, state, and federal governments - that actually promoted the discriminatory patterns that continue to this day.
-
-
Better suited to print than audio
- By ProfGolf on 02-04-18
-
The Supreme Court
- By: William H. Rehnquist
- Narrated by: John Pruden
- Length: 10 hrs and 41 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Chief Justice Rehnquist's engaging writing illuminates both the high and low points in the Court's history, from Chief Justice Marshall's dominance of the Court during the early 19th century through the landmark decisions of the Warren Court. Citing cases such as the Dred Scott decision and Roosevelt's Court-packing plan, Rehnquist makes clear that the Court does not operate in a vacuum, that the justices are unavoidably influenced by their surroundings, and that their decisions have real and lasting impacts on our society.
-
-
Absorbing
- By Jean on 01-28-18
What listeners say about Injustices
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Carl Howard
- 06-03-15
An important history of SCOTUS extremism
Milheiser lays out a definitive storyline. I like this narrator, too - I've heard him before.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
1 person found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Kurt Civilette
- 09-02-23
Good research but very demoralizing
I had to stop and restart this several times. I would get so angry about how unelected judges have let their opinions ruin lives for centuries. not just today. Good research on the part of the author. I do not like this reader at all. His voice is scratchy and always sounds like he is whispering.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Mc2
- 10-28-15
Great read!
I wish that the current politicians would read this book and stop acting like children in a playground.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
1 person found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Jo Green
- 07-15-15
Very educational.
This book is a wonderful history of cases and the decisions of the judges. I feel that hindsight is 20/20, I have to say I had a pretty strong personal reaction to some decisions, I'm also aware others may respond to different cases with the same incredulity.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
2 people found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- David J. Klopotoski
- 02-24-19
great book, recording had a couple issues
Loved the book and the reading was well done. there are a few spots during the book where the recording repeats for some reason. there are no cuts, the reading just goes back a few lines and seamlessly repeats.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- steve finkelstein
- 10-07-18
Good but depressing
This book is a fairly quick listen but very disheartening if you believe in life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you believe in misogyny, white supremacy and bigotry, this book will make you very happy
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
3 people found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- James
- 04-01-15
Is It HALF FULL or HALF EMPTY ? It Depends !
Any additional comments?
I bought this book because the author was interviewed by Stephanie Miller on her show on Free Speech TV. The title and interview sounded a bit negative. However, I thought I would give it a listen, hear for myself, and make up my own mind. To get the most out of this book one should have a general understanding how the Federal district courts, the Federal circuit court, and the Supreme Court work individually and together. The next paragraph provides a summary of the structure of the federal court system that does not occur until chapter 7 and is missed in part one of the book; however, if you already know the court structures skip the next paragraph.
“SC History: the ratification of the United States Constitution established the Supreme Court in 1789. Its powers are detailed in Article Three of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is the only court specifically established by the Constitution, and all the others were created by Congress. The Court first convened on February 2, 1790, by which time five of its six initial positions had been filled. The sixth member joined on May 12, 1790 every decision that it made is done by a majority of the Justices setting on a case. Congress has always allowed less than the Court's full membership to make decisions, starting with a quorum of four justices in 1789. Article III of the United States Constitution leaves it to Congress to fix the number of justices. The Judiciary Act of 1789 called for the appointment of six justices, and as the nation's boundaries grew, Congress added justices to correspond with the growing number of judicial circuits: seven in 1807, nine in 1837, and ten in 1863. In 1866, Congress passed an act providing that the next three justices to retire would not be replaced thinning the bench to seven justices by attrition. Consequently, one seat was removed in 1866, the second in 1867. However in 1869, the Circuit Judges Act returned the number of justices to nine, where it has since remained.”
The book starts into Supreme Court (SC) history toward the end of the Civil War in 1863. Lincoln exorcised his war powers to abolish slavery in states in rebellion. It took until December 6, 1865, to abolish the legal practice of slavery under the Constitution with the ratification of the 13th amendment. The 14th, amendment ratified July 9, 1868, defines citizenship and the rights of citizens and provides equal protection under the laws. The 15th amendment, ratified February 3, 1870, prohibits the federal and state governments from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's race, color, or previous condition of servitude. These reforms were not uniformly embraced. Those with pre Civil War mindsets resented these reforms and sought to undermine them. The Supreme Court left at Lincoln death had many such minds on the bench.
WHAT’S IN THE BOOK: SHORT VERSION
THE BOOK IS DIVIDED INTO THREE PARTS:
PART ONE: Discusses the judicial opposition to the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments and how cases were interpreted in a way to restrict their effect to the federal government only, leaving state governments to run amuck with Jim Crow laws. Next, if the states or Congress tried to do something positive to improve worker safety by regulating hours or pay the Court bared it as an infringement on the employers’ right to negotiate terms of employment in a contract with individual employees holding it was a violation of the due process clause of the 14th amendment. [See Lockner v New York (1905)] Too bad if the employer held all the economic cards in this unequal negotiation. It took the 16th amendment 1913 to overturn a Supreme Court ruling in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. (1895) against the governments’ authority to pass the first income tax law that only applied to the rich.
PART TWO: Discusses the Court’s swing to the left in the period from Roosevelt through Johnson. As the Court’s philosophy changed, the damage that was done in the years from 1863 to 1929 was revisited. New legislation from both state and federal legislatures correcting the faults of the past was upheld by the changed makeup of the Supreme Court. The new philosophy grew strong enough to attack Jim Crow, equalize the rights of women, and neuter states who had a pattern of discrimination in education and voting. The citizens’ rights balance with civil police authority was redefined.
PART THREE: Discusses the revival of conservative philosophy in the face of civil violence in 1967. Nixon took advantage of fear of riots to appoint four conservative justices. Bush appointed another two conservative justices. With the first four justices reasonable exceptions to restrictions on police power were made. Attempts to expand civil rights were blocked. With the Bush justices the court began to weaken the Civil Rights Act, Voting Rights Act, and other decisions modified the past Court decisions, and a decision on Campaign Financing to open the floodgates to increasing the power of money in politics. The author then discusses decisions of the Roberts Court and how Judge Alito has chipped away at civil and employee rights. Next the author discusses how the Affordable Care Act ended the practice of denying insurance to persons with a preexisting condition. He ends by expressing his fear for the future of the Court and its policy of Judicial Restraint may be overwhelmed by partisan strident intransigence.
MY FINAL RCOMENDATION IS A THUMBS UP:
I listened to the book and gave it a few days reflection. Yes, its mindset is a bit left leaning. However the scholarship and the facts used were in general fair and honestly treated and was not a political screed as I had feared from the title. I give this book a score of 8.5 out of a possible 10. It is strongest when it describes the needs of disempowered people. It is weakest when it fails to recognize that the justices on any Court in part represent the values they learned or reacted to those events that shaped their lives. The impression I get is the author suggests the Court member’s attitude comes from privilege, greed, indifference, or malice toward the poor. I cannot attribute these motives to the Court’s members past or present. The author has a liberal mindset. That is good. The liberal mindset is driven by a high empathy care / harm values toward others. However, the author must recognize the other values that drive the conservative mindset, like [(fairness / cheating), (loyalty / betrayal), and (authority / subversion)] based values are not wrong and have their own merit. Good Christian conservatives do not so much hate the poor as they are infuriated by individual examples fraud or cheating which abuse the public purse and rob the poor of sustenance, to use the Biblical term. For more on this topic listen to or read the “THE RIGHTEOUS MIND: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion” by Jonathen Haidt.
Stylistically the paragraphs are a bit choppy and topic jump. They jump around a bit chronologically too. The Supreme Court cases cited are generally on point but again chopped up and mixed together, a bit haphazardly, with narrative for me to follow closely. I needed to use Google, Wikipedia, and use other sources, to get all I wanted and expected in the way of explanation of the Supreme Court decisions.
I do recommend this book after acknowledging its shortcomings. Conservative thinkers will not like it as well as I like it. Then I don’t fit easily in either box. Nevertheless, they too should give it a listen or read the book and not just dismiss it as a polemic of left wing touchy feely goodie two shoes crap. Just because conservatives may disagree with liberal focus the (care / harm) value priority; it does not mean that the history presented is wrong; nor the message that justices of both stripes bend the meaning of the Constitution toward the values their hearts cherish.
The ultimate answer to the question of is it half full or half empty depends whether one is viewing the book as a liberal or died in the wool economic conservative purest. From that prospective the answer is it is BOTH half full and half empty at the same time. Much like Schrodinger's cat experiment; until you open the book and listen / read it the cat is both alive and dead.
The narrator, Joe Barrett, did an excellent job; he did a Nixon impersonation when speaking as Nixon. The tone of the voice is rich and has a pleasant tambour on the ear. However, I would expect nothing less from the trained actor he is.
HERE ARE THE HITS AND MISSES I FOUND IN THE BOOK
HITS: The author did a good job outlining the need for legislative action to correct corporate abuse. The author did a good job describing the social attitudes and economic conditions. The author did a good job describing monopolistic practices of trusts and conspiracies between the trusts to suppress unions, strikes, boycotts, and buy influence with government to back their agenda. The author described the American Liberty Liege (a forerunner to Americans for Prosperity) opposing the new deal. The author described how an amendment process is a clumsy and subject to Supreme Court interpretation to turn the language on its head. The author described well the conservative power block in the Supreme Court that opposed Roosevelt and how the complexion of the court changed. The author described the effect of changing judicial philosophies on Court decisions and how they in turn provide the basis additional legislation. The author describes the effects of a renewed conservative majority on the Court and his fear for its future.
MISS: There is no description how the Federal District Court and Circuit Courts and the Supreme Court until chapter 7. Dissenting SC opinions are infrequently addressed. Summary of SC decision rational are insufficient, in my opinion. [I found myself stopping the narrator and using Google and Wikipedia to look up the Supreme Court cases being discussed for a more in-depth critique and analysis.] Perhaps beyond the scope of this book, the author failed to identify the political failing of the left to match the rights, so far successful, “Red State Strategy” of gaining control of state legislatures after the 2010 census allowing them to gerrymander the districts. The discussion of the practice of gerrymandering is insufficient. Nor did the author addressed the increasing trend to cut congressional staff in favor of de facto subcontracting of the legislation drafting to lobbies and industry think tanks who hand spoon feed their preferred language and approach back to the representatives and senators to tweak the final product and rubber stamp it toward a law. In the epilog the author does light his hair on fire a bit over his fears for the future rulings of the Supreme Court. Does the author have reason to be concerned? Yes! Do we need to be concerned over the ship of states ability to right itself from the effects of an unruly Court? No!
STOP ###############################################################
YOU WANT MORE THAN IN THE ABOVE SUMMARY OF BOOK CONTENT FLAVOR
A LONGER VERSION FOLLOWS:
WHAT’S IN THE BOOK: LONG VERSION
Part I, the first six chapters cover the period from the start of 1963 to the start of 1929.
It is characterized by judicial activism undermining the effects of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments and oppress worker rights in favor of business and property rights.
Reconstruction required the defeated rebellious states to accept the 13th amendment to regain their full states’ rights back. Chapter 1, describes the backlash of southerners chafing under reconstruction seizure of power through intimidation, violence, and the imposition of Jim Crow laws to strip the newly enfranchised black man of his voting rights relegating him to a status no better than a woman. Women did not get the right to vote until 1919. The implementation of Jim Crow laws were made possible when the Supreme Court held that the federal government did not have the jurisdiction to enforce the protections of the bill of rights and that citizens should look to their state legislature for laws and regulations to enforce their rights. This left the southern states free to impose Jim Crow laws and disenfranchise black voters.
Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 cover the following topics: Chapter 2 describes how organizes workers’ who wanted to negotiate with Pullman rail were crushed when the local federal District Court held the union was a monopoly under the Sherman Antitrust Act (SAA) and enjoined them from striking. Federal troops were called in to restore order and enforce the injunction. The Supreme Court upheld the lower court decision but citing the law of nuisance to property rights to support the injunction. This was a broader authority to oppose labor movements then the SAA misinterpretation. Chapter 3 in 1892, the American Sugar Refining Company gained control of the E. C. Knight Company. This formed a trust that controlled 95% of sugar processing capacity. The trust also controlled the production, distribution, and price of sugar. Supreme Court ruled in 1895 limited the government's power to control monopolies neutering the Sherman Antitrust Act. Chapter 4 discusses opposition to the development of child labor laws. Congress passed the Keating-Owen Act in 1916. In 1918 in Hammer v. Dagenhart, the Supreme Court said that Congress does have the power to regulate commerce of goods only not the fact that the goods were manufactured by children and that the Keating-Owen Act was therefore unconstitutional. Chapter 5 discusses mill towns, work place safety, health, hours worked, and minimum wage in factories and mines. In a quartet of Supreme Court legislation designed to regulate worker hours or wages paid the Court found in Lockner v New York decision 1905 found that the employer’s right to contract with individual workers trumped the states right to regulate the negotiation process despite the economic inequalities of the parties. The Court held that for the state to infringe on this process was a violation of the due process clause of the 14th amendment. Chapter 6 the Supreme Court, in 1927, ruled that a state statute Permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the “due process clause” of the 14th amendment; the decision was largely an endorsement of negative eugenics. The Supreme Court also issued decision censoring descent speech against the war during WW I. The labor leader Eugene Debs was imprisoned not for his union activity but his opposition to censorship.
Part II: Begins in the 1929 and ends 1967; chapters 7 through 9
Chapter 7 describes how legislative progress was made reversing bad past decisions in part one. The National Labor Relations Act granted the right to organize and negotiate wages and working conditions and required employers to negotiate. In May 1935 the Supreme Court struck down a Railroad Retirement (Railroad Retirement Board v Alton Railroad) system at the same time President Roosevelt was working on Social Security legislation. Thus the battle lines were drawn. In the 1936 election The American Liberty Liege (a forerunner to today’s Americans for Prosperity) was formed to oppose Roosevelt re-election and his programs. Roosevelt won! The complexion of the SC changed with one justice defection and two replacement justices removing the battle lines with the Court.
Chapter 8 describes how a new deal southern democrat could support President Roosevelt yet remain an avowed segregationist. Described how the SC upheld the government’s right to intern Japanese American citizens in camps. Describes how Justices Black, Frankfurter, Warren and Brennen shifted the core conservative and oppressive philosophy of the Court to one more interested in the rights of the citizen. They set about to dismantling of segregation Jim Crow laws and reconnecting the citizens to the protections of the bill of rights.
Chapter 9 In 1964 Congress got off the sidelines and passed the landmark Civil Rights Act. This Act bolstered the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision and slowly segregation began to buckle. Justice Rehnquist became the philosophical spokesmen for the conservative point of view that a person’s property rights trumped civil rights of individuals and a business can discriminate against its customers. Goldwater became the political spokesmen of this view. The author discusses the Senates filibuster role in frustrating civil rights legislation. He then discusses voter suppression and disenfranchising laws that frustrate the intent of the 15th amendment. Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to address this pattern discrimination. The Warren court rejected the challenges to the Civil Rights Act 1964 and Voting Rights Act 1965. Had judicial philosophy been different progress would not have occurred.
Part III: Begins in 1967 to Present in Chapters 10 through 13
Chapter 10 Looting and riots ends progressive activism. An incident of police brutality against a black taxi driver in Newark NJ triggered a 5 day riot ending in 26 dead and hundreds of injuries. The upshot of this was a frightened general populist and the election of a law and order candidate Richard M Nixon. The Warren court had previously limited police power by reforming police procedures in rejecting evidence from searching without warrants, providing counsel for the arrested, and the Maranda warning. Nixon appointed 4 justices Burger, Blackman, Rehnquist, and Powell with a more conservative bent reshaping in part the bench’s judicial philosophy. These four justices stopped the more liberal wing from equalizing funding for schools, created an exemption in the Maranda warning for immediate public safety needs, and ruled that information given freely to a company for business purposes (phone call numbers) has no expectation to privacy. However, three of these justices’ disappointed conservatives by joining the majority in deciding women have a right to control their body and reproductive rights in Row v Wade in 1973. Reproductive freedom is essential equal protection of women. Other protections of women unpaid maternity leave, and equal pay. Reagan justice department published a 153 page document “guidelines on constitutional litigation” to set a narrowed but moderate point of view. The guidelines instructed the justice prosecutors that some Supreme Court decisions are read narrowly and others given abroad affect. This set an overall moderate tone. John Roberts began in the Reagan justice department and 22 years later he is the Supreme Court Chief Justice.
Chapter 11 is titled “Rigging the Game”. This refers to the Supreme Court’s decision to interfere with the recount in the Florida’s election and declare George W Bush, President in 2000. Bush appointed Roberts and Alito to the Supreme Court bench. The Roberts court gutted the Voting Rights Act and opened the flood gates of money to the election process. This has inspires states to gerrymandering to favor Republicans and attempts to suppress voting through new voter identification laws. Judging between constitutional and unconstitutional gerrymandering is difficult. The standards are not clear. The current bench is punting on this issue. Other mischiefs being done at the state level are cutting early voting and requiring photo ID and purging of voter lists.
Chapter 12 discusses problems with the food and drug administration’s supervision of drug companies in the development of medicine. The author says that the current crop of conservative justices can undermine civil protections by interpreting the civil rights laws too narrowly, placing barriers between workers and the Court house door, by shunting consumer’s off into forced arbitration tribunals that are stacked in favor of the companies they are suing; the Courts undermine public protections as surely as the Lockner decision in 1905 when the Court turned the meaning of the due process clause of the 14th amendment upside down to protect employers. The author discusses the 2007 Lilly Ledbetter case and Justice Alito decision restricting her access to the Courts for relief. Congress did overturn the decision with the Lilly Ledbetter Act in 2009. The author discusses mixed motive lawsuits. In 2009 the Court acted to eliminate mixed motive lawsuits and Congress has yet to overrule it with legislation. In 2013 the Court acted to restrict the definition of supervisor to persons who has the power to hire or fire an employee. This opens the door for first line supervisors, directing normal operations, to harass or intimidate employees while insulating upper management from the liability of their agent, the first line supervisor. Modern questionable business activities like forced arbitration with captive corporate arbiters is discussed as barriers to access to the courts. The Courts love arbitration as a means of keeping nuisance issues and minor lawsuits off the court dockets. However, if arbitrators are not truly independent it is like hiring the fox to watch the hen house. This practice is being abused by business and is in need of regulation with Court backing. The Constitutional Accountability Center says their statistics suggest the court philosophy has in deed shifted in favor of business; 70% of the cases favor business since Alito joined the Court. By taking the concept that corporations are people too, the Court now grants these de facto “pseudo people” religious exemptions, as a way of poking holes in civil rights protections. Where in the Bible does it say corporations even have souls?
Chapter 13 discusses how the Affordable Care Act (ACA) ended the practice of denying insurance to persons with a preexisting condition. Several cases supporting the need for insurance coverage were discussed. Uninsured patients were reduced to being treated with free samples from caring physicians. The author then strays into politics pointing out that conservatives were for the ACA to protect the public from “free riders” in the 1990’s before they were against it in 2010. The author expressed outrage over the 13 states attorneys general that filed a suit opposing the ACA. The ACA survived the challenge by a whisker. The opponents centered their attack on the individual mandate. The Court rejected this attack citing the 16th amendment power to tax. The author comes close to discussing the “motivated reasoning” in “The Righteous Mind” I discussed in my recommendation when he spoke about minds being hard wired to a particular point of view. The author takes comfort that judges are concerned for their reputation and do not want to own a Lockner like decision as their legacy.
In his epilog the author bemoans the unassailability of the Supreme Court. However, the bottom line is that if the Court behaves in a way that is grossly offensive to the public and their congressional representatives Congress can act to curb an intransigent willful Court by adjusting the number of their membership. This is the nuclear option the justices need to respect. [ In my personal opinion the author does light his hair on fire a bit over his fears for the future rulings of the Supreme Court. Does the author have reason to be concerned? Yes! Do we need to be concerned over the ship of states ability to right itself from the effects of an unruly court? No! ]
END
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
12 people found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Byron
- 11-02-15
No Wonder they Don't Have to Run for Office!
Over the last few months, I have picked up a couple of books on Supreme Court History (most notably Scorpions and The Great Dissent), and with this book, Injustices, I now understand that the political battles over appointees to the Supreme Court are really important to the political parties, and not for the reasons that we tend to think. Traditionally, the Supreme Court has been much more of a tool of government repression than the conscience of America. And perhaps that is where we are headed again, which, depending on your political perspective, might or might not be a good thing.
My preferred rating for this book would be "Troubling", not through any fault of the author, who I think makes his bias very clear, and presents his point of view fairly, and reasonably dispassionately. Troubling because it shows that political expediency is very central to the courts thinking. As one who works within the legislative branch of government, it is scary to think that the era of great justices is over, and we have returned to placing political hacks on the Court.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
1 person found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Catherine M
- 05-05-15
More of a political history
What did you like best about Injustices? What did you like least?
Most of the book concerns a telling of the author's view of the historical background of a select few Supreme Court cases with comments regarding the author's opinion of the justices involved. Toward the end of the book, however, the author descends into a political speech about the current justices stances vis a vis the ACA that was not a coherent extension to the rest of the book.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
3 people found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- James
- 09-16-15
Very disappointed in this book
This book wasn’t for you, but who do you think might enjoy it more?
The author light his political philosophy intrude into his writings to the point that you might as well just had him say that he's a liberal and doesn't like conservatives
What do you think your next listen will be?
I don't know what I will be listening to do next but I can guarantee you it will not be anything written by this Arthur
Would you be willing to try another one of Joe Barrett’s performances?
I have no problems with the narrator there was sometimes in the book were it repeated itself but that probably had more to do with the editing of the recording rather than the narrator
What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?
I was very disappointed in this book
Any additional comments?
The part that I was the most disappointed in was the authors interpretation or review of the court that has happened in my lifetime and I know both sides of the coin, he failed to see why the Supreme Court in life terms needs to be adjusted. He also failed to see the slippery slopes of some of the mandates approved by the courts. One of the outstanding issues that the court has done in recent years is the Chief Justice ruling on Obama care being a tax. This slippery slope started when we permitted the government's to require everyone has to have car insurance before they can operate a vehicle legally. The problem with that ruling is that we are mandating the purchase or guaranteed sale to a for profit company that then led into the Chief Justice calling Obama care a tax and you are required or mandated to purchase health insurance from a for profit company. A tax is money that is paid directly to or collected for the government. A good example of that is the military we pay taxes to the federal government, who in return purchases weapons and other items for the military. If the mandated insurance was paid directly to the government and then think government went out and bought the insurance it would then be a tax. The author was not able to understand that in the way he wrote his opinion in this book.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!