
SUPERDETERMINISM DEFEATS ATHEISM
HOW PHYSICS DISPROVES ATHEISTIC IDEOLOGY
Failed to add items
Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.
Add to Cart failed.
Please try again later
Add to Wish List failed.
Please try again later
Remove from wishlist failed.
Please try again later
Adding to library failed
Please try again
Follow podcast failed
Please try again
Unfollow podcast failed
Please try again
Access a growing selection of included Audible Originals, audiobooks, and podcasts.
You will get an email reminder before your trial ends.
Audible Plus auto-renews for $7.95/mo after 30 days. Upgrade or cancel anytime.
Buy for $6.99
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use, License, and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
-
Narrated by:
-
Virtual Voice

This title uses virtual voice narration
Virtual voice is computer-generated narration for audiobooks.
About this listen
Additionally, this book presents the Superdeterministic Argument for the Existence of God: 1) our universe is a predetermined static block universe without continuous causation in physics, 2) our universe must have been created outside of time because of the zero-energy of the universe, where the positive energy and negative energy (gravity) of the universe perfectly cancel each other out implying that the universe was nonetheless caused to exist, 3) the creator of our universe would have to know of and understand all the advanced technologies that exist in our universe in order to predetermine their existence in our static block universe, and 4) therefore, a supremely intelligent Creator of our universe must be real.
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
It's interesting to note that this author falls back on an omnipotent God to explain apparent holes in the physical theories he describes. This is exactly the same argument used by Newton in his description of the essence of gravity. The fact that we can't yet prove or explain certain phenomena or ideas, does not necessarily prove that these phenomena were put in place by an omnipotent God.
The author is clearly wrong on a couple of theological ideas: First, that Jesus founded Christianity. (He did not and might well be more than a bit disappointed in some instantiations of the faith established in His name.) Second, the author refers to Buddhism and other non-Judaeo-Christian religions as "false" beliefs.
The author claims that Christianity is the "only" religion "endorsed" by God. Even if you accept that God created the universe, God's exclusive endorsement of Christianity does not logically follow from this argument, notwithstanding the New Testament Bible verses that the author cites. At this point, the book betrays itself as Christian screed, and listeners expecting a cogent argument will summarily turn it off.
Christian Screed Masquerading as Science
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.