This book is like a loaf of bread

This book is like a loaf of bread. A simple, humble, absolutely excellent loaf of bread.

This author apparently decided that The best way to write a good vampire story was to keep it simple, keep it straightforward, and not try any fancy tricks or plot twists. And instead focus on making the words and descriptions as carefully honed and clear as possible.

The language use of this book is beautiful. You can tell that the author has a remarkably straightforward and streamlined mind. There doesn’t seem to be a single word of extraneous or unnecessary text anywhere in this book. Every single word serves a purpose. Every single sentence drives the plot forward.

What I liked most about it is that it comes across as emotionally honest. The author is good at creating settings and rhythms that will pull you into the general mood of a situation or scene without getting you so deeply involved that you walk away feeling emotionally hung over.

This book is not likely to make you laugh out loud, but it will make you chuckle. It’s not going to make you cry. But it will pull at your heart strings.

Finally I would like to complement this book on its technical skill. This is almost a textbook example of how to write a really good novel. There is a clear introduction, Set up, beginning of conflict, climax, resolution, wrapup. The author follows very consistent patterns of set up, emphasize, pay off. He leaves room for the possibility of a sequel without actually implying that there will be one.

In short: you could graph this novel out on a high school creative writing class. It’s not trying to be anything crazy. It’s just being really, really, really good at what it is.

The author consistently follows “show, don’t tell“ pays us, the readers, the complement of assuming that we have both enough intelligence and attention span to catch all the details and paint a vivid mental picture.

The story is solid. Reasonably predictable but all the better for it, in my opinion.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Good but depressing

The story was great. I liked the play off the classic. The story also moved well enough. But, I would feel so depressed after each session of listening. Maybe it was the story. Maybe it was the narrator.

It's not like a moving work of historical fiction where you should feel sad. It's like the narrator, or the author, wanted to leave the reader/listener with a sense of dreariness.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Poindexter meets Dracula

An admirable debut, the writing had a nice flow, not too wordy and the story stayed interesting. Joseph Barkley, a book store owner, is hired to purchase and deliver the original, Braum Stokers, Dracula, along with all the notes and memoirs, to a very, to say the least, strange eccentric in Transylvania.  His journey turns out to be as much about the delivery as it is a personal quest to find out more about he and his brothers family history, and how they may be connected. 

As he finds out more about his employer he is pushed into a position that requires him to become a sleuth/slayer, not only  to protect himself but also the ones he loves.   The people that try to help him have a way of ending up dead, so he has to learn how to collect information with out the knowledge of his employer, or his minions, (semi-human slaves).   To avoid certain death or lifelong entrapment he must try to unravel Braum Stokers, unpublished epilogue that reveals what his employer is really after. 

Many unusual, somewhat endearing, but also suspicious and gruesome characters, help to make this a compelling storyline that was different.  Sometimes, like in this case, different is good.   The narrator was an acquired taste, his voices were better than his narrative.   Jump in but hold onto your souls for the sequel. 

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

11 people found this helpful

Vhat a Bummer

I'm backing into this review, (to save myself from fans of this genre that would stake me just for not giving this book 5*'s): If you are a fan of this genre, get this book...if you liked the approach of The Historian, more dark fantasy than horror, get this book. If, like me, you like your blood-sucking fiends rising from their coffins mean and sinister, red-eyed, claw-handed, long in the tooth, stinking of grave rot and eau de carrion, with a strong speech impediment concerning their W's...get this book. It 's good, entertaining, and will keep the listener ensconced in the vampire lore. But, caveat emptor....buyer beware!

Prouty started out with the underpinnings of a scintillating story: elements he extrapolated from Stoker's Dracula, mixed with some quasi-history and some interesting philosophical points; a rare manuscript said to be Stoker's original, containing chapters never published; a young purveyor of antique books and rare manuscript expert, born in Romania with a twin brother (who is now a priest); a mysterious foreign buyer, willing to offer anything for the manuscript; and Transylvania--the Carpathian mountains, the superstitious villagers, graveyards, garlic, and Castle Dracula...the stuff that screams gothic horror and grabs any fan by the throat. This story has it all, and Prouty shines when it comes to setting the stage. The only way this book could have more atmosphere is if you opened the cover and a damp gray fog roiled out from the pages and wolves howled in your room. So vhat vent vrong? The execution went wrong.

After his own manuscript was rejected by publishers, Prouty was advised by said publisher to write a vampire thriller (which at the time would have been the subject du-jour). He said he read vamp books including The Historian and the classic Dracula, and was underwhelmed by Stoker's demise of the nefarious Count. With that disappointment in mind, Prouty came up with the framework for Stoker's Manuscript. For an greenie-author to set out on his maiden voyage to improve on such a classic is a bit hubristic--but he did have a point--as Stoker's original destruction of Dracula was much more epic.

But this novel ended up being like a good coloring book page before it is colored in--and speaking just from the point of what might have been--the book seems rushed and therefore lacks development, depth, and finesse; everything is like an opaque version of fantastic. The back-stories are not worked in sufficiently, the emotions are completely missing, the mysteries not cryptic or engaging enough to keep you tuned in, (and the *love story* is dead on arrival). Reading this, I got a better understanding of why Kostova took 700 pages (or 26 audible hours) to unravel the mysteries of The Historian. There is so much good stuff here that needs to be polished for the story to flow, build suspense, help us connect with and like the characters, get those goose bumps going. Too bad, because this had the promise of a great classic horror story. Prouty says he is already writing the sequel; I'm on board...but can't help thinking what some authors could have done with this one. (In the hands of King...now that is fantastically scary.) Finally, the narrator--he is sufficient and especially good for the young Joseph, just not the voice I would choose to portray a horrific creature descended from the darkest of lineage...

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

26 people found this helpful

Reads like a good abridged novel

First let me say that I enjoyed this debut novel. The story is well told and horrific enough for those of us who are fans of this genre (antique book dealer gets hired to authenticate Bram Stoker's manuscript and, well, guess who his real client is!). That said, it moves along way too fast -- going from one scene to the next before you can barely digest what just happened. Characters are introduced and disposed off with an ease that makes you feel that you are listening to the abridged version of the full novel -- even if it is a good abridgment. In the end, there are even some almost-loose-ends that you wish the author had dealt with better.

Still, I love my Bad Vampire yarns and this is one of them. I look forward to seeing the author improve with practice.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

11 people found this helpful

very good

great historical content. narrator had excellent accents. enough horror keep you interested and great description of people and geography.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful