The Anti-Chomsky Reader Audiobook By Peter Collier, David Horowitz cover art

The Anti-Chomsky Reader

 Preview
Try for $0.00
Prime logo Prime members: New to Audible?
Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

The Anti-Chomsky Reader

By: Peter Collier, David Horowitz
Narrated by: Kirk Jordan
Try for $0.00

$14.95/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $11.87

Buy for $11.87

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
Switch payment method
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel

About this listen

 This collection of essays examines Noam Chomsky's controversial ideas about various foreign and domestic issues and even the legitimacy of the linguistics theories on which his reputation rests. It explores the dark corners of what the New Yorker recently called "one of the greatest minds of the 20th century".©2004 Peter Collier; 2004 David Horowitz (P)2007 Blackstone Audio, Inc. History & Theory Political Science Politics & Government
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
All stars
Most relevant  
Absolute must read if you've ever doubted or questioned chomsky or any of his theories.

loved it

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Chomsky taken roundly to the wood-shed on multiple fronts. Last chapter is particularly fantastic!

I was appalled to see that the highlighted review showing when I purchased the book, was a negative review by an individual who started by saying that he only listened to the first 15 minutes of the book. Audible, your bias is showing.

Chomsky's tendency and inclination to support his wild opinions by describing things in terms that neither he nor I truly understand like quantum mechanics, etc, leave me with a strong taste of boloney when reading him however unable to formulate a true counter argument.

it has been a real pleasure to hear Chomsky decimated by specialists from the fields in which Chomsky pretends to have knowledge.

My one lament is that like Chomsky himself, the facts will have no effect on the useful idiots who are his adoring fans.

Outstanding!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I used to look up to Chomsky through my youth as he was touted in media and on university as one of biggest and most influential intellectual of all time. So I listened with curiosity what he had to say... but there was always that gut feeling that something is off...

15 years later, social discourse started sounding very much like all the Chomsky arguments that I listened back in rebellious years. Then I figured it out, what was off was the way in which he dealt with criticism, how he simply brushed it all aside and continued with his agenda through twisting words and meaning of words.

I was quite stunned to be able to source today problems our society faces to same relativism he was expressing for decades. (well, silly me...)

When you have to deal with adult that self-describes as anarchy-syndicalist you should know from start who you are dealing with. Problem is that media never truly challenged him on his topic where he was... in past 50 years... to say the least controversial, like downplaying Khmer Rouge atrocities, to serve his agenda and personal beliefs.

This book really shattered last piece of credibility that I would have been willing to extend towards Chomsky. Thanks to authors for having courage to write this book, knowing what backlash it could produce against them.

I always had that gut feeling ...

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Chomsky is a maestro of illogicality dressed up in a veneer of intellectual sounding verbage. The author of this book does an excellent job of unravelling the illogicality that has done so much to influence youthful minds.

Debunking a Popular Maestro of Hateful Illogicalty

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
It's astounding to what lengths an academic would go to to further his political agenda. The examples provided are convincing. Chomsky and Attenborough are cut from the same cloth.

Chomsky is lying through his teeth

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I hoped this book would lay out Chomsky's arguments in good faith and present counterarguments. Unfortunately, it does nothing of the sort. It devastatingly discredits him as an apologist for Cambodia's Khmer Rouge, among other examples that show Chomsky had horrifyingly bad judgement. If he were a candidate for office, this might be a useful exercise in ensuring that someone with such bad judgement isn't elected to a position of authority. But Chomsky is an intellectual. His influence is in his original ideas, not his bankrupt moral authority and despicable associations.

I have never been able to make much sense of Chomsky's arguments. I know Chomsky subscribes to an ideology of anarchism or libertarian-socialism, but that sounded more like a complaint about employer-employee power relationships than a proposal for making a better world. Perhaps the authors are equally mystified by Chomsky, because they merely mock the label libertarian-socialism without defining or discussing it. Perhaps Chomsky does spout pure nonsense, but given that generations of people have found Chomsky insightful, I think it is fair of me to expect of a book about Chomsky would at least explain why his adherents find Chomsky persuasive.

The strongest chapter of the book covers Chomsky's attacks on the "corporate" media. In the context of today's rightwing attacks on the American media, it was interesting to hear a full-throated conservative defense of the American media.

Discredits Chomsky rather than rebut him

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
They use strawmen all over the place and purposefully misunderstanding and misinterpret Chomsky. This book was a waste of time.

Dishonest writers

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Thought the author’s bias was so skewed that it undermined the quality of his argument and made him seem petty.

Poor research, biased presentation

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.