Fact Or Fiction?

As with the murders themselves, we will probably never know. But this is a great read and a must for all true crime lovers!

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

Interesting Story

If you are looking for a fascinating / new book for Jack the Ripper, this is it. Written and read well. If you are looking for the gory murder details of the ripper, you won't find it here. This is a tastefully written story on tragic events.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Disappointing Ending!

What did you like best about The Autobiography of Jack the Ripper? What did you like least?

The story and the narrator, but for the last hour of the book, when, inexplicably, he proceeds to review and retell the previous 7 hours!? Why? What a waste!

Would you be willing to try another book from James Carnac? Why or why not?

I'm not sure. See above.

What about Mark Meadows and Christian Rodska ’s performance did you like?

Great voices and interpretation of the characters.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

No.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Easy to listen to.

This is a very easy audio to listen to. I really enjoyed this. Entertaining story and very believable.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

So Much Sinister Fun

Would you try another book from James Carnac and/or Mark Meadows and Christian Rodska ?

I don't know that we could get another book from "James Carnac," could we? The narration on this book is a blast. It's treated with a verisimilitude that just sells it, even when you know it shouldn't work.

What was your reaction to the ending? (No spoilers please!)

To describe the ending, I have to first explain my thoughts on beginning. I'm not a Ripperologist by any stretch, and I love a good alternate history. This book starts out so convincing that you have to stop yourself from believing it at times. The deeper the book goes, the more wrong it gets in all the best ways. It's by no means a book for the serious Ripperologist, but it's a great character study for those who like the "Sith Lord" mentality.

What does Mark Meadows and Christian Rodska bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

I don't think the text alone would have sold it for me. The performance fills in the rest and provides a suspension of disbelief that's required to get the most of out of this one.

Was The Autobiography of Jack the Ripper worth the listening time?

Absolutely. It's probably a better read for those who aren't so attached to the subject matter - you know who you are.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful

Absolutely Fascinating

The narration on this audiobook is superb. But the story is fascinating as well. The manuscript dates from the late 1920's but it is unclear who the author actually is and the circumstances of the how story itself was written are also unclear but this is explained towards the end of the book. However, whether this is really an autobiography of the Ripper or a well researched fictional story, is irrelevant. It gives a clear insight into the times and the dialogue is also superb capturing the dialect of the era.
I was unsure when I purchased this but after listening to it I would highly recommend it. If you think you might be interested but are unsure, you wont regret your purchase.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

13 people found this helpful

Hard to suspend disbelief and let the story take

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

For a story supposedly written as a memoirs it real like a novel with a lot of holes on the story. Well written but hard to suspend disbelief and let the story take you.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful

Entertaining with verossimilitude

The slow and deliberate description of how a psycopath is built could be written either by a modern criminal behaviourist or else by the psycopath himself. Though addressed, the old question of "nature X nurture is not solved here, nor is ti of the major relevance.
The "omission of certain scenes", though, doesn't add verossimilitude (I would rather have them added).
Even though it helps to explain the end of the crimes, I don't know if it fits 100% with the rest of the story; but anyway, who could tell it?
A good entertainment for those who enjoy criminal and historic romances. But I wouldn't suggest it for those who dislike gothic stories.

At 1.25 reading speed, a C1-C2 English level book.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

Maddeningly fascinating!

The Autobiography of Jack the Ripper is a maddeningly fascinating work. It was reportedly discovered in 2008 in the possessions left to his heirs by S.G. Hulme-Beaman, a children's author and illustrator best known as the creator of the Toytown stories and their characters (including Larry the Lamb) who died in 1932. The manuscript is attributed to "James Carnac," who professes to be the real Jack The Ripper writing about his gruesome exploits 40 years after the fact. The book is made up of four parts: 1) Introductory notes apparently made by S.G. Hulme-Beaman, which explain how he came upon the manuscript while acting as executor of Carnac's estate, but failed to follow Carnac's directions to send the manuscript to a publishing house due to its disturbing and distasteful subject matter; 2) the first two sections of the narrative, which relate the story of Carnac's young life (including his father's murder of his mother and subsequent suicide) and Whitechapel years (including the Ripper slayings); 3) the third section of the narrative, produced on a different typewriter than the first two sections and written in a different, more "fictional" voice, bringing Carnac's story to an all-too-neat end; and 4) commentary by Alan Hicken and respected Ripperologist Paul Begg.

What is this book, exactly? Several possibilities exist. It might represent Hulme-Beaman's attempt at a "true crime"-inspired novel, but this seems unlikely due to both the man's workload and his personality. It might be a novel by another author that came into the possession of Hulme-Beaman. (There is no record that James Carnac ever existed.) It might be a genuine autobiography of Jack the Ripper, and either the author's name is actually a pseudonym or somehow the historical James Carnac managed to live and die without creating a paper trail. Or perhaps it is a modern-day hoax purporting to be a manuscript from the late 1920s.

I went into this with the intention of reading it much like The Lodger (1913), an early twentieth-century novel by Marie Adelaide Belloc Lowndes, a woman who lived through the Autumn of Terror and evoked it well in her story. As such a work of fiction, The Autobiography of Jack the Ripper is effective. Carnac's fascination with blood, his knowledge of his father's act of murder/suicide, his curiosity about his French ancestors' roles as executioners, and his own strange (and resisted) compulsion to kill his kind uncle set the stage well for the horrors to come.

The descriptions of his behavior as Jack the Ripper offer the most interest. Unlike most works and speculations of the time, which attributed to the Ripper complicated motives (religious fanaticism, a personal vendetta against women, a desire to undermine the police force and law in general), Carnac comes across much in the way we understand modern psychopaths today. He killed because he liked killing, and he got away with his crimes because he was smart enough to choose his victims carefully. His dark, wry sense of humor is both startling and convincing. What is more, the end of the Ripper's murderous spree has a believable justification: Carnac was badly injured in an accident with a carriage (while crossing the street to get to a paper detailing his latest crime), losing both his leg and his mobility.

What I find most fascinating about the book is how it follows and deviates from known facts about the murders. Carnac admits that he had kept scrapbooks of media coverage of the crimes, and the similarity between some of his narrative and contemporary newspaper accounts can be explained by the fact that, after forty years, he returned to his clippings to remind himself of particulars. That said, he also deviates in some critical ways from widely-reported details -- and, in one case, provides a detail only known to have been reported in one account published in New York -- which certainly creates the effect of firsthand knowledge.

The odd ending, with its vastly different tone -- and, seemingly, purpose -- is also a mystery unto itself.

It's interesting to speculate on the real nature of this work. I am not suggesting that I was persuaded that Carnac existed or that he was the Ripper, but I was impressed by the psychological insight of the text and the historical mysteries it provides.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

10 people found this helpful

Intriguing

Interesting to hear from Jack's perspective- new twist. enjoyed comparative at the end. Amazing if true.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!