Horrible in Both Competence and Morality

(I would give 0 stars, if that was an option) I am no Leftist. But I am absolutely not what Friberg is, and no one should be if they care about reality or morality. And what is Friberg, according to his very own words? White supremacist, collectivist, authoritarian, and honestly just not very bright. Either he's very unintelligent or very dishonest, because he contradicts himself backwards and forwards.

- He literally ignores that there is any actual reality of racism. I've heard people like him pretend they themselves are not racist, but never have I heard someone so stupid or dishonest as to implicitly or explicitly deny racism even exists.

- He claims he is against assimilation or for a right to difference, yet in complete contradiction says people SHOULD be assimilated to their ethnic group. Because, and this is emphasized about an actual 100 times in the writing, he's against individualism. And yet he says autonomy and freedom matter to him, BUT that someone is basically somehow just a predetermined product of their race. Again, either very stupid or very dishonest.

- He talks about man as spiritual and against attacks to this, yet then he goes on to root all spirituality biologically and ethnically, which if one has even the most basic understanding of philosophy, even ancient, they know that makes no sense. And although he doesn't outright say so, many of his influences, especially Evola, literally, explicitly hate Christianity. Even Leftist atheists understand Christianity to at the least have contributed culturally. But oh, that's where the alt right doesn't like it, because God forbid God himself preach equality of all human beings in ontological value. They therefore think themselves as God who gets to deem truth and right simply because they say so.

- He claims he is against Negative Legitimization, where he says the Left says "Vote for us, because we're not the alt right," but he does the EXACT SAME thing. He says the Left is wrong on this and that. Why, you ask? Because he said so. He says he is right on this or that. Why, you ask? Because he said so. He offers no proof of what is natural, unnatural, true, false, etc. - no argumentation, no evidence, not even statistics. He just says to believe him because he's not them. Again, very stupid or very dishonest.

- He is authoritarian. He believes that hierarchies should rule people, rather than persons ruling themselves. But of course he thinks that if they're the same race, then it'll all be just fine. How stupid is this man? Obviously completely illiterate in history. Neither Left nor Right authoritarianism has ever been good for any subjected to it. He says he believes in autonomy at all nonpolitical levels, but in politics, he thinks you must submit to masters over you who are superior because of God only knows why - just like extreme Leftist communists. He thinks "if only we have the right people." Like. Every. Stupid. Communist. Again, very stupid or very dishonest.

- The man is racist. Let's be honest here. I'm not saying he's racist because he's born white and stained with the sin since being a baby or whatever bogus comprehensive explanation he waves around to make the magic trick of disappearing racism by saying only those explanations of it are used by all people to refer to it. The man is literally racist. He thinks a human being is determined by their genetic history. Ah yes, because Socrates' dad, grandfather, and great-great-great grandfather were all as bright as him. And Friberg lives in Viktor Orban's Hungary now, literally somewhere where Chinese, Central Asian nomads, and Iranian peoples comprise much of the genetic makeup of the people (since global migration has occurred for all time, since before there were even homo sapiens!) - a cool diversity I myself think is awesome and fascinating; yet he and Orban, if they were consistent with everything they say, they would claim it to LITERALLY ruin the country, yet to the contrary they think the country is awesome - how do they explain their total contradiction? And Friberg says he respects a right to difference, but he then states that Europeans are superior and literally calls other people groups "subordinate." Not only does he make this obviously and unambiguously racist claim, but he does so with absolutely zero argument, zero evidence, zero examples, zero anything. He just says it as a matter of dogma. You're supposed to believe him because he said so. Which is literally how every white supremacist grounds their entire argument: "Uh huh, because I said so, and because it's the case because." Again, either very very very stupid or very very very dishonest.

The last thing I'll add to all this is, I might be wrong. He might not be either very stupid or very dishonest - he might be both! And evil. Let's not forget that.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!