
The Rose of York
Fall From Grace
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $19.95
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Robin Sachs
-
By:
-
Sandra Worth
Listeners also enjoyed...




















Powerful and affecting.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
King Richard the idiot
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
What made the experience of listening to The Rose of York the most enjoyable?
Great story.What did you like best about this story?
Told from the point-of-view of Richard III and his wife.What does Robin Sachs bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?
Made the story come to life. Excellent job.Who was the most memorable character of The Rose of York and why?
Richard III King of England and his wife are portrayed with much humanity. They did not have an easy life and it is possible that when Shakespeare wrote his play Richard III he gave it a pro Henry and Jasper Tudor slat for the grandchild of Henry VII. Maybe Richard III was not the villain he was made out to be in his life-time.Dick the Bad....Maybe not so much
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Very entertaining
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Would you recommend this audiobook to a friend? If so, why?
Yes, if the friend likes historical novels. I myself am not sure whether I do or not. In most historical novels of the past (the great ones such as Manzoni's Bethrothed, Tolstoy's War and Peace), the protagonists are minor personages who can be invented at will, so you have have a great story and become really engaged with the characters without having to ask too many questions regarding major historical figures. However, when the story centers around a man such as Richard III, there is the inevitable question regarding historical veracity: to what extent is such a version of the man or woman in question plausible and in conformity with what is recorded? The novelist's first duty is to create a story that convinces, and in this Sandra Worth succeeds admirably. Her Richard III is a tragic hero come to life. He is very moving, and gets our sympathy (apart from exasperation at his passivity at the end). And I would like, very much like, for Richard III to have been this man. BUT, I don't know. Judging from the changes that were effected during his short reign, one might think it plausible. And given the extent and nature of Tudor propaganda, it certainly seems possible. But was it really like that, or anything close? Were the Rivers really such a bad bunch, or quite different? Was Henry Tudor really so loathsome (records would seem to give some credence to this)? Many such questions beset me after listening to this novel, and I do not have the time or inclination to finding answers. So this could be the last novel of this sort that I will read: I am tempted to stick to non-fictional history. But as a novel, this one is quite good.What did you like best about this story?
The portrayal of Richard III as a noble, tragic character who was not able to overcome the adversities that frustrated his good intentions. He would have had to be far more ruthless, among other things.Which character – as performed by Robin Sachs – was your favorite?
Richard III.If you were to make a film of this book, what would the tag line be?
The Tragedy of the Good KingAny additional comments?
Robin Sachs reads well, but I did not like his way of histrionically deepening his voice every time a man spoke. If one must bring out the direct speech, I would prefer different mean such as speaking with greater expressiveness.Good historical novel
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.