Who Was Jesus? Did He Rise from the Dead? A Muslim-Christian Debate Audiobook By Dr. John Warwick Montgomery cover art

Who Was Jesus? Did He Rise from the Dead? A Muslim-Christian Debate

 Preview
Try for $0.00
Access a growing selection of included Audible Originals, audiobooks, and podcasts.
You will get an email reminder before your trial ends.
Audible Plus auto-renews for $7.95/mo after 30 days. Upgrade or cancel anytime.

Who Was Jesus? Did He Rise from the Dead? A Muslim-Christian Debate

By: Dr. John Warwick Montgomery
Narrated by: Dr. John Warwick Montgomery
Try for $0.00

$7.95 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $13.00

Buy for $13.00

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
Switch payment method
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use, License, and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel

About this listen

The Inns of Court School of Law in London, England, was the scene of a lively debate on the truthfulness of the claims of two of the world's most prominent religions on October 17, 2003. The debaters were Shabir Ally, a graduate of Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario, with a BA in religious studies, and president and founder of the Islamic Information and Da'Wah Center in Toronto, Canada; and John Warwick Montgomery.

©2016 1517 The Legacy Project (P)2016 1517 The Legacy Project Entertainment & Performing Arts Spirituality
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_T1_webcro805_stickypopup
All stars
Most relevant  
I enjoyed the opportunity to hear these two argue for their understanding of Jesus. I found their actual arguments weak! The Muslim scholar depended so much on the idea that the death and resurrection pf Jesus evolved over the years from Mark to John. The Christian found himself basically on the defense. My question would be: Since the
Quran says the Gospels are from God via Jesus, why wouldn't the debate endeavor to argue the understanding of the text rather than the accuracy? They both, rightly, agree we should read the texts!

Interesting but neither "side" was that convincing!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I find Muslim belief that Christ Ascended into Heaven without having Resurrected from the dead preposterous ….

Dr Montgomery and Simon Greenleaf both use an objective standard of proof to judge the Gospels - that standard is the evidentiary rules used in a court of law ….

But you don’t need the rules of evidence or opinions of the scholars to judge the gospels … use those tools that you use every day to judge people and situations you encounter every day …

Blessed is he would has not seen and believes …

God Bless … ❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🔥

Excellent coverage of the subject matter

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
In 2023, we expect everything to be concise. This debate is from 2003, and it shows. It could've been half as long, and it would've done better to capture the attention of an Audible listener. (The live audience might've appreciated the length.) The arguments are interesting. But it loses momentum halfway through with the repetition. The audio quality is bad for the question and answer section to the point it was hard to hear the questions. Beyond that, it was enjoyable, even for a non-academic.

It Could've Been Half as Long

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.