In this episode, Dr. Keith Eakins discusses his concerns about the "hubris" he has seen in recent Supreme Court rulings and their impact on the Court's legitimacy. Along the way, he and James get into spirited discussions regarding how much discretion the administrative state should have when implementing or interpreting laws and whether or not concerns expressed about the Court overturning "precedent" are just partisan attacks against decisions some court followers don't like.

Dr. Keith Eakins is a professor of political science at the University of Central Oklahoma. You can find out more about Dr. Eakins here: https://www3.uco.edu/centraldirectory/profiles/5546

Learn more about Dr. Emily Stacey here: https://www.rose.edu/staff/social-sciences-department/stacey-emily/

Learn more about Professor James Davenport here: https://www.rose.edu/staff/social-sciences-department/davenport-james/

Learn more about the arguments over the Chevron Doctrine in Loper Bright v. Raimondo here: https://www.law.uw.edu/news-events/news/2023/loper-bright-enterprises-v-raimondo

Find previous episodes of Not My Generation here: https://notmygeneration.captivate.fm/

Not My Generation is recorded and produced by Possibilities, Inc. You can learn more about Possibilities, Inc. here: https://www.possibilitiesinc.org/

You can follow Not My Generation on X (Twitter) at @NMGpodcast and on Facebook at Not My Generation Podcast. You can also email us at NotMyGeneration@raider.rose.edu.

The views expressed here are solely the views of the hosts and their guests and do not represent the views of Rose State College, its administration, faculty, or students.

Mentioned in this episode:

Not My Generation Promo Snippet