• 37 - Competency and Insanity Evaluations

  • Sep 25 2024
  • Length: 58 mins
  • Podcast

37 - Competency and Insanity Evaluations

  • Summary

  • Understanding the distinction between court-ordered evaluations, such as competency to stand trial, is crucial for navigating complex legal cases involving mental health. In this episode, Dr. Rod Hoevet discusses how these evaluations impact legal outcomes, with a focus on the high-profile case of Bianca Ellis, a woman from Cleveland, Ohio, who stabbed a 3-year-old to death. As the public grapples with her legal proceedings, forensic psychologists delve into the critical differences between assessing competency and examining the insanity defense, shedding light on the intricate balance between mental illness and criminal responsibility.


    Timestamps

    00:00 Introduction to Forensic Psychology
    02:51 Understanding Competency to Stand Trial
    06:07 The Evaluation Process and Its Importance
    08:55 Legal Implications of Competency
    11:48 Unique Cases and Evaluations
    14:59 The Role of Mental Health in Competency
    17:50 Challenges in Evaluating Competency
    21:06 Public Perception and Misunderstandings
    23:56 The Insanity Defense vs. Competency
    27:13 The Importance of Timely Evaluations
    30:02 Consultation and Collaboration with Attorneys
    32:56 The Role of Forensic Psychologists in High-Profile Cases
    35:51 Mentorship and Education in Forensic Psychology

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/killer-psychologist--6020549/support.
    Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about 37 - Competency and Insanity Evaluations

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.