Freakonomics Radio

By: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
  • Summary

  • Freakonomics co-author Stephen J. Dubner uncovers the hidden side of everything. Why is it safer to fly in an airplane than drive a car? How do we decide whom to marry? Why is the media so full of bad news? Also: things you never knew you wanted to know about wolves, bananas, pollution, search engines, and the quirks of human behavior. To get every show in the Freakonomics Radio Network without ads and a monthly bonus episode of Freakonomics Radio, start a free trial for SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts or by visiting siriusxm.com/podcastsplus.
    2024 Dubner Productions and Stitcher
    Show more Show less
Episodes
  • 626. Ten Myths About the U.S. Tax System
    Mar 14 2025

    Nearly everything that politicians say about taxes is at least half a lie. They are also dishonest when it comes to the national debt. Stephen Dubner finds one of the few people in Washington who is willing to tell the truth — and it’s even worse than you think.

    • SOURCES:
      • Jessica Riedl, senior fellow in budget, tax, and economic policy at the Manhattan Institute.

    • RESOURCES:
      • "The House Wants to Pass Trump’s Agenda in One Big Bill. Here’s What’s in It." by Margot Sanger-Katz and Alicia Parlapiano (New York Times, 2025).
      • "Correcting the Top 10 Tax Myths," by Jessica Riedl (Manhattan Institute, 2024).
      • "Spending, Taxes, and Deficits: A Book of Charts," by Jessica Riedl (Manhattan Institute, 2024).
      • "Why Did Americans Stop Caring About the National Debt?" by Jessica Riedl (Reason, 2024).
      • "A Comprehensive Federal Budget Plan to Avert a Debt Crisis," by Jessica Riedl (Manhattan Institute, 2024).
      • "When Does Federal Debt Reach Unsustainable Levels?" by Jagadeesh Gokhale, Kent Smetters, and Mariko Paulson (The Wharton School of Business, 2023).
      • "The Limits of Taxing the Rich," by Jessica Riedl (Manhattan Institute, 2023).

    • EXTRAS:
      • "Farewell to a Generational Talent," by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 4 mins
  • 625. The Biden Policy That Trump Hasn’t Touched
    Mar 7 2025

    Lina Khan, the youngest F.T.C. chair in history, reset U.S. antitrust policy by thwarting mega-mergers and other monopolistic behavior. This earned her enemies in some places, and big fans in others — including the Trump administration. Stephen Dubner speaks with Khan about her tactics, her track record, and her future.

    • SOURCES:
      • Lina Khan, former commissioner of the Federal Trade Commission and professor of law at Columbia Law School.

    • RESOURCES:
      • "Merger Guidelines" (U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, 2023).
      • "The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications," by Jan De Loecker, Jan Eeckhout, and Gabriel Unger (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019).
      • "US Antitrust Law and Policy in Historical Perspective," by Laura Phillips Sawyer (Harvard Business School, 2019).
      • The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age, by Tim Wu (2018).
      • "Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox," by Lina Khan (Yale Law Journal, 2017).
      • "A Tempest In a Coffee Shop," by Tanya Mohn (New York Times, 2004).

    • EXTRAS:
      • "The Economics of Eyeglasses," by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
      • "Should You Trust Private Equity to Take Care of Your Dog?" by Freakonomics Radio (2023).
      • "Are Private Equity Firms Plundering the U.S. Economy?" by Freakonomics Radio (2023).
      • "Is the U.S. Really Less Corrupt Than China — and How About Russia? (Update)" by Freakonomics Radio (2022).
    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 3 mins
  • EXTRA: The Downside of Disgust (Update)
    Mar 5 2025

    It’s a powerful biological response that has preserved our species for millennia. But now it may be keeping us from pursuing strategies that would improve the environment, the economy, even our own health. So is it time to dial down our disgust reflex? You can help fix things — as Stephen Dubner does in this 2021 episode — by chowing down on some delicious insects.

    • SOURCES:
      • Paul Rozin, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Val Curtis, late disgustologist at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
      • Sandro Ambuehl, economist at the University of Zurich.
      • Emily Kimmins, R&D lead for the sensory and consumer-science team for Kraft Heinz.
      • Iliana Sermeno, former chef at The Black Ant.

    • RESOURCES:
      • “Stink Bugs Could Add Cilantro Flavor to Red Wine,” by Alex Berezow (Live Science, 2017).
      • “Edible insects: Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security,” by the F.A.O. (United Nations, 2013).
      • “I Hate to Break it to You, but You Already Eat Bugs,” by Kyle Hill (Scientific American, 2013).
      • “Five Banned Foods and One That Maybe Should Be,” by Leah Binkovitz (Smithsonian Magazine, 2012).
      • “Effects of Different Types of Antismoking Ads on Reducing Disparities in Smoking Cessation Among Socioeconomic Subgroups,” by Sarah J. Durkin, Lois Biener, and Melanie A. Wakefield (American Journal of Public Health, 2009).
      • “Flesh Trade,” by Stephen Dubner and Steven Levitt (The New York Times, 2006).
      • “Feeding Poultry Litter to Beef Cattle,” by Jay Daniel and K.C. Olson (University of Missouri, 2005).

    • EXTRAS:
      • "Why Does Everyone Hate Rats?" by Freakonomics Radio (2025).
    Show more Show less
    44 mins

What listeners say about Freakonomics Radio

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    25
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    27
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    25
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    2
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

A general knowledge lover's goldmine

To put simply, I've recommended the podcast to almost everyone I know, and they love it.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Brilliant

Balanced, informed and entertaining. I love everything Freakonomics and NSQ. Easy to consume and well produced.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Very Intresting

The episodes are very interesting. They make you think and also answer some interesting questions.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Data driven but very left leaning

Data driven, which is good.
Left leaning to the point that most of the experts presenting the information skew the informations natural conclusion or the premise.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Try it!

I recently found Freakenomics radio and really enjoy it. Contrary to other reviewers, I don’t feel it’s pushing a political agenda at all. It simply brings up random questions and tries to answer them with real data. My favorite episode so far is #514 with Roland Fryer. I found him very funny and interesting.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Very biased

While the show is entertaining, it is extremely biased. I have never heard this show say anything bad about any Democrat. I don’t think they have ever give an authentic complement towards a republican. It seems like economists no longer consider all of the facts. They just consider the ones that matter to their agenda.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!