Freakonomics Radio

By: Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
  • Summary

  • Freakonomics co-author Stephen J. Dubner uncovers the hidden side of everything. Why is it safer to fly in an airplane than drive a car? How do we decide whom to marry? Why is the media so full of bad news? Also: things you never knew you wanted to know about wolves, bananas, pollution, search engines, and the quirks of human behavior. To get every show in our network without ads and a monthly bonus episode of Freakonomics Radio, sign up for SiriusXM Podcasts+ on Apple Podcasts at http://apple.co/SiriusXM.
    2024 Dubner Productions and Stitcher
    Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2
Episodes
  • 612. Is Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade Its Most Valuable Asset?
    Nov 21 2024

    The 166-year-old chain, which is fighting extinction, calls the parade its “gift to the nation.” With 30 million TV viewers, it’s also a big moneymaker. At least we think it is — Macy’s is famously tight-lipped about parade economics. We try to loosen them up. (Part one of a two-part series.)

    Please help us by taking our audience survey at freakonomics.com/survey.

    • SOURCES:
      • John Cheney, carpenter at Macy’s Studios.
      • Will Coss, vice president and executive producer of Macy’s Studios.
      • Jeff Kinney, author, cartoonist, and owner of An Unlikely Story Bookstore and Café.
      • Kevin Lynch, vice president of global helium at Messer.
      • Jen Neal, executive vice president of live events and specials for NBCUniversal Media Group.
      • Tony Spring, chairman and C.E.O. of Macy's Inc.
      • Jessica Tisch, commissioner of the New York City Department of Sanitation; incoming commissioner of the New York City Police Department.
      • Dawn Tolson, executive director of Citywide Event Coordination and Management and the Street Activity Permit Office for the City of New York.

    • RESOURCES:
      • Macy's: The Store. The Star. The Story., by Robert M. Grippo (2009).
      • History of Macy's of New York, 1853-1919: Chapters in the Evolution of the Department Store, by Ralph M. Hower (1943).
      • Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.

    • EXTRA:
      • The Economics of Everyday Things.
    Show more Show less
    54 mins
  • How to Stop Worrying and Love the Robot Apocalypse (Update)
    Nov 18 2024

    It’s true that robots (and other smart technologies) will kill many jobs. It may also be true that newer collaborative robots (“cobots”) will totally reinvigorate how work gets done. That, at least, is what the economists are telling us. Should we believe them?

    • SOURCES:
      • David Autor, professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
      • James Rosenman, C.E.O. of Andrus on Hudson senior care community.
      • Karen Eggleston, economist at Stanford University.
      • Yong Suk Lee, professor of technology, economy, and global affairs at the University of Notre Dame.

    • RESOURCES:
      • "Robots and Labor in Nursing Homes," by Yong Suk Lee, Toshiaki Iizuka, and Karen Eggleston (NBER Working Paper, 2024).
      • "Global Robotics Race: Korea, Singapore and Germany in the Lead," by International Federation of Robotics (2024).
      • "Unmet Need for Equipment to Help With Bathing and Toileting Among Older US Adults," by Kenneth Lam, Ying Shi, John Boscardin, and Kenneth E. Covinsky (JAMA Internal Medicine, 2021).
      • "Robots and Labor in the Service Sector: Evidence from Nursing Homes," by Karen Eggleston, Yong Suk Lee, and Toshiaki Iizuka (NBER Working Papers, 2021).
      • The Work of the Future: Building Better Jobs in an Age of Intelligent Machines, by David Autor, David Mindell, Elisabeth Reynolds, and the MIT Task Force on the Work of the Future (2020).
      • "Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets," by Daron Acemoglu and Pascual Restrepo (University of Chicago Press, 2020).
      • "The Slowdown in Productivity Growth and Policies That Can Restore It," by Emily Moss, Ryan Nunn, and Jay Shambaugh (The Hamilton Project, 2020).
      • "The China Shock: Learning from Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade," by David H. Autor, David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson (NBER Working Papers, 2016).
      • "Deregulation at Heart of Japan's New Robotics Revolution," by Sophie Knight and Kaori Kaneko (Reuters, 2014).

    • EXTRAS:
      • "What Do People Do All Day?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
      • "Did China Eat America’s Jobs?" by Freakonomics Radio (2017).
    Show more Show less
    49 mins
  • 611. Fareed Zakaria on What Just Happened, and What Comes Next
    Nov 14 2024

    After a dramatic election, Donald Trump has returned from exile. We hear what to expect at home and abroad — and what to do if you didn’t vote for Trump.

    SOURCE:

    • Fareed Zakaria, journalist and author.

    RESOURCES:

    • "The Most Dangerous Moment Since the Cold War," by Fareed Zakaria (The Washington Post, 2024).
    • "America’s Failed Approach to Iran Can’t Really Be Called a Strategy," by Fareed Zakaria (The Washington Post, 2024).
    • Age of Revolutions: Progress and Backlash from 1600 to the Present, by Fareed Zakaria (2024).

    EXTRAS:

    • "Are We Living Through the Most Revolutionary Period in History?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
    • "Are Private Equity Firms Plundering the U.S. Economy?" by Freakonomics Radio (2023).
    Show more Show less
    59 mins

What listeners say about Freakonomics Radio

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    25
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    27
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    25
  • 4 Stars
    2
  • 3 Stars
    2
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

A general knowledge lover's goldmine

To put simply, I've recommended the podcast to almost everyone I know, and they love it.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Brilliant

Balanced, informed and entertaining. I love everything Freakonomics and NSQ. Easy to consume and well produced.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Very Intresting

The episodes are very interesting. They make you think and also answer some interesting questions.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    3 out of 5 stars

Data driven but very left leaning

Data driven, which is good.
Left leaning to the point that most of the experts presenting the information skew the informations natural conclusion or the premise.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Try it!

I recently found Freakenomics radio and really enjoy it. Contrary to other reviewers, I don’t feel it’s pushing a political agenda at all. It simply brings up random questions and tries to answer them with real data. My favorite episode so far is #514 with Roland Fryer. I found him very funny and interesting.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Very biased

While the show is entertaining, it is extremely biased. I have never heard this show say anything bad about any Democrat. I don’t think they have ever give an authentic complement towards a republican. It seems like economists no longer consider all of the facts. They just consider the ones that matter to their agenda.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!