• What we know about Russia’s new Oreshnik missile.
    Nov 23 2024
    What we know about Russia’s new Oreshnik missile.RT news breaks down everything known about the new medium-range hypersonic weapon.Russia’s newly unveiled Oreshnik missile has quickly become the focus of major international attention. Announced by President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, this medium-range hypersonic weapon is seen as a significant advancement in the country’s missile capabilities. One that could have far-reaching consequences for both the Ukraine conflict and broader international security. With its apparently unmatched speed and precision, and the prospect of mass production on the immediate horizon, this missile could be a game-changer for Moscow’s military operation. Here’s what we know so far about the Oreshnik and its potential impact.1. A new weapon, not an upgrade.Contrary to some claims, the Oreshnik is not an upgrade of Soviet-era missile systems, according to Putin. Instead, it is a completely new development built on modern Russian technology. The president emphasized that the missile represents the culmination of efforts within “New Russia,” referring to developments after the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991. “It was created on the basis of modern, latest developments,” he stated.2. Hypersonic capabilities and precision.The Oreshnik missile is described as a high-precision, medium-range weapon, with hypersonic speed. Putin clarified that while it is not considered a “strategic” weapon, its capabilities are still formidable. “Due to its striking power, especially with massive, collective use, and even in combination with other high-precision long-range systems, the use of Oreshnik will be comparable in power to strategic weapons,” he said.This missile is designed to fly at speeds of up to Mach 10 (around 7,600 miles/12,200km per hour), which is roughly ten times the speed of sound. The high velocity makes it extremely difficult to intercept using current missile defense systems. “There are no means of counteracting Oreshnik-type complexes in the world,” Putin asserted, explaining that Western missile defense systems, including those deployed in Western Europe, cannot intercept such fast-moving projectiles.3. First combat use and response to Ukraine.The Oreshnik missile was first used in combat on November 21, 2024, when it struck a Ukrainian defense facility in the city of Dnepropetrovsk. The target was the Yuzhmash industrial complex, a key Ukrainian defense site inherited from the USSR that produces missile equipment. Putin justified the strike as a response to Kiev’s use of long-range missiles, like the American ATACMS and British Storm Shadow systems, against Russian territory. “The regional conflict in Ukraine has acquired elements of a global character,” Putin said, highlighting the broader implications of Western involvement.4. Mass production and deployment.Following the successful test and first use of the new weapon, Russia has committed to mass-producing the system. “Serial production of Oreshnik is practically organized,” Putin confirmed, with the missiles slated for inclusion in Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces (RSVS). This suggests that they will become a key part of Russia’s long-term military strategy, with the potential for widespread deployment in the coming months.Putin noted that the missile’s development process was swift and efficient, with domestic technologies ensuring that Moscow has “resolved import substitution issues.” This suggests that Russia has managed to develop the Oreshnik entirely with its own resources, minimizing reliance on foreign components.5. Global impact and strategic significance.The Oreshnik missile has the potential to change the dynamics of the Ukraine conflict. According to General Sergei Karakayev, the head of Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces, the Oreshnik “can hit targets throughout Europe.” This makes the missile not only a powerful weapon in the context of Ukraine but also one that could have wider geopolitical implications if tensions escalate further.While Russia has not explicitly described the missile as a weapon of mass destruction, its precision and destructive power mean that it could be used to target critical infrastructure in enemy states. In Putin’s view, it provides Russia with a technological advantage that currently cannot be matched by any other country.6. International reactions and future developments.The Oreshnik missile has raised alarms in the West. The use of this new weapon, combined with the conflict in Ukraine, has spurred calls to strengthen air defenses. Ukrainian officials have already approached the US to discuss receiving advanced systems, which could include modernized Patriots or even Aegis missile defense platforms. However, there is no evidence to suggest they would be effective against the Oreshnik.
    Show more Show less
    5 mins
  • ICC issues arrest warrant for Netanyahu.
    Nov 21 2024
    ICC issues arrest warrant for Netanyahu.
    Prosecutors in The Hague are also seeking the detention of Israel’s former defence minister, Yoav Gallant.
    The International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague announced on Thursday that it has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity linked to the Gaza conflict.
    Hamas military leader Mohammed Deif has also been named in a warrant for similar charges.
    The court accuses Netanyahu and Gallant of using starvation as a method of warfare, alleging they deliberately deprived Gaza’s civilian population of essential supplies, including food, water, and medicine.
    Prosecutors claim there was “no obvious military necessity” for such actions, which amount to violations of international law.
    Both Israeli politicians could face arrest if they travel to any of the 123 countries that are signatories to the ICC’s Rome Statute.
    The charges are part of a broader ICC investigation that includes alleged crimes by Hamas during its October 7 attacks on Israel.
    Prosecutors have accused Deif, the mastermind of the assault, of murder, torture, and hostage-taking. Israel claims to have killed Deif in an airstrike earlier this year, though Hamas has not confirmed his death.
    The move has sparked an immediate backlash. Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett called the ICC warrants a “mark of shame,” while opposition leader Yair Lapid labeled the decision “a reward for terrorism.”
    The Israeli government has consistently denied committing war crimes and rejects the court’s jurisdiction. The US and Russia – among others – also don’t recognise the ICC.
    Israel has challenged the ICC’s jurisdiction and argued that it was not given the opportunity to investigate the allegations internally. Netanyahu’s government has dismissed the Hague’s actions as politically motivated interference.
    In Washington, incoming Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune has threatened sanctions against the ICC, echoing earlier House-approved legislation. “If the ICC does not reverse this outrageous action, the Senate must act to sanction the court,” Thune said.
    Other Republican lawmakers, including Senator Susan Collins, pledged to support Israel and press for punitive measures against the ICC.
    The ICC prosecutor, Karim Khan, initially requested arrest warrants in May, alleging widespread violations during Israel’s military response to Hamas. The court said its Pre-Trial Chamber found “reasonable grounds” to believe the accused were responsible for crimes against humanity, including persecution and inhumane acts.
    Last year, the ICC issued similar warrants for the detention of both Russian President Vladimir Putin and the country's Children's Rights Commissioner Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova.
    Show more Show less
    3 mins
  • Russia’s new nuclear doctrine (KEY POINTS).
    Nov 20 2024
    Russia’s new nuclear doctrine (KEY POINTS).
    President Vladimir Putin has approved changes to the Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence.
    Russian President Vladimir Putin has officially signed a new national nuclear doctrine that outlines the scenarios in which Moscow would be authorized to deploy its nuclear arsenal. Here are the key points of the updated document, as stipulated on the Kremlin's website.
    1. State policy on Nuclear Deterrence is defensive by nature, it is aimed at maintaining the nuclear forces potential at the level sufficient for nuclear deterrence, and guarantees protection of national sovereignty and territorial integrity of the State, and deterrence of a potential adversary from aggression against the Russian Federation and/or its allies. In the event of a military conflict, this Policy provides for the prevention of an escalation of military actions and their termination on conditions that are acceptable for the Russian Federation and/or its allies.
    2. The Russian Federation considers nuclear weapons as a means of deterrence, their use being an extreme and compelled measure, and takes all necessary efforts to reduce nuclear threat and prevent aggravation of interstate relations, that could trigger military conflicts, including nuclear ones.
    3. The Russian Federation ensures nuclear deterrence toward a potential adversary, which is understood to mean any individual states or military coalitions (blocs, alliances) which see the Russian Federation as a potential adversary and possess nuclear arms and/or other weapons of mass destruction or conventional forces with a significant combat capability. Nuclear deterrence is also ensured toward any states which provide the territory, airspace, and/or maritime space under their control as well as resources for preparing and conducting an aggression against the Russian Federation.
    4. An aggression of any single state from a military coalition (bloc, alliance) against the Russian Federation and/or its allies will be regarded as an aggression of the coalition (bloc, alliance) as a whole.
    5. An aggression against the Russian Federation and/or its allies of any non-nuclear state with the participation or support of a nuclear state will be regarded as their joint attack.
    6. The Russian Federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear arms and/or other weapons of mass destruction against itself and/or its allies, as well as in the event of an aggression against the Russian Federation and/or the Republic of Belarus as constituents of the Union State using conventional arms, if such an aggression creates a critical threat for their sovereignty and/or territorial integrity.
    7. The decision to use nuclear weapons is taken by the President of the Russian Federation.
    Show more Show less
    3 mins
  • Musk reacts to Biden reportedly allowing deep strikes on Russia.
    Nov 17 2024
    Musk reacts to Biden reportedly allowing deep strikes on Russia.
    The billionaire has joined other members of Donald Trump’s circle in condemning the outgoing president’s apparent move.
    SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, a close confidant of US President-elect Donald Trump, has weighed in on President Joe Biden’s apparent decision to officially sanction the use of American missiles on targets deep within Russian territory, agreeing with a post stating “libs love war.”
    With just two months left in office, Biden reportedly gave in to one of Ukraine’s long-standing demands on Sunday afternoon, authorizing Kiev to use its American-provided Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) in strikes on Russia’s Kursk Region. The decision was simultaneously reported by multiple US media outlets.
    Ukraine plans to conduct its first long-range attacks in the coming days, Reuters reported, citing “two US officials and a source familiar with the decision.”
    Biden’s decision marks a significant escalation in the conflict. While Ukraine has possessed ATACMS missiles since April, the US president did not at that time give Kiev permission to use them on internationally recognized Russian territory. To date, they have been used in strikes on Russia’s Crimea, Donetsk, and Lugansk regions, which Washington considers Ukrainian.
    Responding to the news on X, Utah Senator Mike Lee, a Republican, declared that “Libs [liberals] love war,” adding: “war facilitates bigger government.”
    “True,” Musk replied.
    While SpaceX has provided the Ukrainian military with Starlink internet terminals, Musk has long argued that Kiev cannot hope to defeat Russian forces on the battlefield, and that the conflict must end in a negotiated settlement. The tech tycoon endorsed Donald Trump – who has vowed to bring a swift end to the fighting – earlier this summer, and following Trump’s defeat of Vice President Kamala Harris last week, he has emerged as one of the president-elect’s closest advisers.
    Musk is not the only figure in Trump’s orbit to condemn Biden’s decision. Richard Grenell, a close adviser to the president-elect who served as acting director of national intelligence in 2020, accused Biden of “escalating the wars before he leaves office.”
    “The Military Industrial Complex seems to want to make sure they get World War 3 going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives,” Trump’s son, Donald Jr., wrote on X. “Gotta lock in those $Trillions. Life be damned!!! Imbeciles!”
    Trump has vowed to bring the conflict to a speedy conclusion, and is expected to push Moscow and Kiev to agree to peace talks. Musk reportedly joined Trump on a phone call to Vladimir Zelensky last week, speaking directly to the Ukrainian leader at one point, according to reports in the US media.
    Musk has not acknowledged taking part in the call, but wrote on X shortly afterwards that “the senseless killing will end soon. Time is up for the warmonger profiteers.”
    Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly warned that Moscow would view any attacks on Russia’s internationally recognized territory with American-supplied weaponry as NATO entering the conflict directly. Such actions, he has suggested, would have severe repercussions, including retaliation against Western interests.

    Show more Show less
    3 mins
  • Biden approves Ukrainian strikes deep into Russia with US missiles – NYT.
    Nov 17 2024
    Biden approves Ukrainian strikes deep into Russia with US missiles – NYT.
    The reported decision by the American president would signify a major change in policy.
    President Joe Biden has reportedly approved Ukraine’s first use of US-provided long-range missiles for strikes deep within Russia, the New York Times (NYT) has claimed, citing anonymous American officials.
    Authorization to use the Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) was reportedly prompted by Russia’s alleged move to utilize North Korean troops in the conflict, the outlet said.
    "Russian and North Korean forces operating in Kursk Region" of western Russia are apparently the intended targets for the weapons, the officials told NYT. Russia has neither confirmed nor denied the presence of North Korean troops on its soil, saying merely that its cooperation with Pyongyang proceeds according to a defense partnership treaty.
    The decision to allow the ATACMS use, if true, would mark a significant shift in US policy. Biden previously eased some restrictions on the use of American weapons on Russian soil, but stopped short of allowing Kiev to use long-range missiles inside the country, which can fly about 300km (190 miles).
    However, the NYT quoted its sources as saying Washington does not expect the change to bring any breakthrough for Ukrainian war effort. The intention is rather to send an intimidating message to Pyongyang.
    The sources also claim that while as of now the authorization for ATACMS covers only Kursk Region, Biden could go further and allow Ukrainians to use the weapons for strikes elsewhere.
    Some officials also expressed fears that the decision may invite retaliation from Russian President Vladimir Putin against the United States and its allies.
    Kiev launched its Kursk incursion in August, and is reportedly encountering serious difficulties supplying its forces with fuel and munitions. Some Ukrainian troops have reportedly been forced to abandon their vehicles and move on foot after running out of fuel.
    Ukraine has suffered over 32,600 casualties in their Kursk operation and has lost hundreds of pieces of heavy weaponry, including 213 tanks, 136 infantry fighting vehicles, and over 1,100 armored cars, according to Russian military estimates released on Friday.

    Show more Show less
    2 mins
  • Pentagon releases update on aliens.
    Nov 17 2024
    Pentagon releases update on aliens.
    UFO sightings have been on the rise, with many cases still unresolved, the US Defense Department has said.
    There is currently no evidence to support claims of extraterrestrial activity, the US Defense Department has stated, despite receiving hundreds of reports of new unidentified flying object sightings.
    An unclassified document from the Pentagon’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) released on Thursday detailed a significant rise in unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) sightings – the military’s term for UFOs.
    The AARO, which was established by the Pentagon in 2022 to identify and resolve UAP sightings, received a total of 485 reports from May 2023 to June 2024.
    A total of 118 cases was resolved during the reporting period, all of which were found to be “prosaic objects such as various types of balloons, birds, and unmanned aerial systems.”
    The report, which aggregates data collected from military personnel, civilian observers, and advanced radar systems, stressed the need for further investigation into these mysterious occurrences.
    “Many other cases remain unresolved and AARO continues collection and analysis on that body of cases,” the AARO stated.
    The report underscores the importance of continued funding and research into UAPs, as officials expressed concern about potential national security implications. Military pilots have reported instances of near misses with UAPs during training exercises, raising the alarm over airspace safety. None of the resolved cases substantiated advanced foreign adversarial capabilities or breakthrough aerospace technologies.
    The AARO has pledged to provide “immediate notification to Congress” should they identify that any cases indicate or involve a breakthrough foreign adversarial aerospace capability, as the Pentagon strives for greater transparency and accountability in the process.
    The Pentagon’s assertion that aliens have never visited Earth has faced scrutiny from independent investigators and conspiracy theorists, many of whom believe the government may be concealing evidence of extraterrestrial life.
    On Wednesday, independent journalist Michael Shellenberger testified on a supposed secret government program called ‘Immaculate Constellation’, submitting a report by an anonymous whistleblower alleging that the Defense Department and intelligence community have withheld evidence from the public about UAPs. Other witnesses included former Defense Department and NASA officials.
    The hearing came more than a year after former Air Force intelligence officer David Grusch testified before Congress that the US government has run a secret “multi-decade” reverse-engineering program involving recovered spacecraft. He also claimed that non-human “biologics” were retrieved from crash sites.
    Following Grusch’s allegations, the Pentagon said it has not “discovered any verifiable information to substantiate claims that any programs regarding the possession or reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past or exist currently.”

    Show more Show less
    3 mins
  • Trump preparing Afghan ‘treason’ charges for US military – NBC.
    Nov 17 2024
    Trump preparing Afghan ‘treason’ charges for US military – NBC.
    The incoming president’s team has dismissed the report as gossip from “selfish Washington DC insiders”.
    US President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is compiling a list of military officers to be court-martialed for their role in the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, NBC News has reported. According to the network’s sources, charges as serious as treason are being considered.
    The effort is being spearheaded by Matt Flynn, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for counternarcotics, the network reported on Sunday, citing a US official and an anonymous “person familiar with the plan.” According to these sources, Flynn will lead a commission examining how the US got into the two-decade war in the first place, and how the withdrawal was carried out.
    “They’re taking it very seriously,” the second source said, adding, “they want to set an example.”
    The first source said that some commanders may be recalled to active duty to face charges.
    Trump struck a deal with the Taliban in 2020, agreeing to pull the US’ roughly 13,000 troops out of Afghanistan within a year and free 5,000 Taliban prisoners if the Afghan militants stood down and let the withdrawal proceed peacefully. After President Joe Biden pushed the withdrawal date back by three months, the Taliban considered the agreement broken and embarked on a lightning-fast reconquest of Afghanistan.
    As the militants closed in on Kabul, Biden hurriedly withdrew US forces, leaving some civilian workers stranded and tens of billions of dollars’ worth of military equipment in Taliban hands. The withdrawal culminated in a suicide bombing at Kabul’s Hamid Karzai International Airport, which killed 13 American service members and 170 civilians.
    Trump has repeatedly referred to the withdrawal as a “humiliation” and “the most embarrassing day in the history of our country.” His nominee for secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has used similar language to castigate the military brass in charge of the operation.
    “These generals lied. They mismanaged. They violated their oath. They failed. They disgraced our troops, and our nation. They got people killed, unnecessarily,” he wrote this year in his book, ‘The War on Warriors’. “And, to this moment, they keep their jobs. Worse, they continue to actively erode our military and its values.”
    Flynn, however, denies any involvement in the supposed plan. “Matt Flynn has nothing to do with the Trump transition team, much less leading any review concerning military justice matters,” his attorney told NBC, adding that “no one has sought out Mr. Flynn’s views on this hypothetical legal scenario.”
    “The sources apparently pushing this story appear to be your typical selfish Washington DC insiders seeking to gain better positioning for their own administration jobs,” a source close to Trump’s campaign told the network.


    Show more Show less
    3 mins
  • ‘F**k you, Elon Musk’ – Brazil’s first lady.
    Nov 17 2024
    ‘F**k you, Elon Musk’ – Brazil’s first lady.
    The comment was made during a heated debate over misinformation on social media platforms.
    Brazilian First Lady Janja Lula da Silva publicly called out billionaire X owner Elon Musk during a G20 social event in Brazil. The country will host the group’s summit next week.
    While speaking, the first lady was interrupted by a ship horn, prompting her to say, “It’s Elon Musk,” before adding, “I’m not afraid of you, f**k you, Elon Musk.”
    Musk reacted on X with laughing emojis and commented: “They are going to lose the next election.”
    The incident highlights the ongoing debate over misinformation on social media platforms. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has criticized Musk’s platform for its policies on the matter, saying, “We cannot allow any platform to undermine democracy and the rights of our citizens.”
    His wife’s remarks sparked backlash from Brazilian opposition figures, including former President Jair Bolsonaro, who cautioned that her comments could lead to diplomatic issues for the current administration.
    In October, Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes authorized the reinstatement of social media platform X in the country, more than a month after its shutdown. The service was blocked on August 30 due to a dispute over free speech, far-right accounts, and misinformation.
    Musk called de Moraes an authoritarian and a censor. Ultimately, X complied with de Moraes’ demands, which included blocking specific accounts, paying fines, and appointing a legal representative in Brazil – a requirement that had led to the suspension.



    Show more Show less
    2 mins