• Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

  • Apr 13 2021
  • Length: 13 mins
  • Podcast

Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • A debt collector must verify the identity of a communication
    recipient to ensure a right-party contact while also avoiding a disclosure
    about the existence of the debt to a third-party. Thus, a debt collector
    must, when asked, provide meaningful information about the purpose of
    a telephone call to a third-party – even when the third-party refuses to
    identify herself – without disclosing that the call is an attempt to collect
    a debt.
    In the latest episode of the Debt Collection Drill podcast, Moss &
    Barnett attorneys John Rossman and Mike Poncin are joined by attorney
    Aylix Jensen who elaborates on her recent, complete victory in Federal
    Court establishing that a debt collector did not violate the FDCPA by
    stating it was a “financial services company” calling regarding a
    “personal business matter” to an unidentified individual – the Plaintiff –
    who the Court identified as the correct “customer for the account.”
    Show more Show less
Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about Landmark Victory! Debt Collector Did Not Deceive Debtor Who Refused to Give Name

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available