• Part 3: Sir Albert and the Missing “H”

  • Feb 3 2022
  • Length: 38 mins
  • Podcast
  • 5.0 out of 5 stars (3 ratings)

Part 3: Sir Albert and the Missing “H”

  • Summary

  • In a state of surprise, Hamza and Brian leave a meeting with the man the Trojan Horse letter was first sent to. And they learn about an internal investigation report that local officials have kept hidden, but which they think could contain a bombshell. To get full access to this show, and to other Serial Productions and New York Times podcasts on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, subscribe at nytimes.com/podcasts. To find out about new shows from Serial Productions, and get a look behind the scenes, sign up for our newsletter at nytimes.com/serialnewsletter. Have a story pitch, a tip, or feedback on our shows? Email us at serialshows@nytimes.com
    Show more Show less

What listeners say about Part 3: Sir Albert and the Missing “H”

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    3
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    3
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    3
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Political stance of the interviewees

I actually love this podcast so far… just hate that I’m so many years behind the curve. The only thing I wanted to say was that, I, like Hamza, was extremely irritated by the interview with the first subject in this episode. It hurt me how disappointed he was and that he felt that his world view had been negated and those of his friends had been validated. I also have to say that I disagree, because my view is very similar to Hamza’s and I feel that that’s the only way our world will ever change for the better: not by forcing our views and ways of doing things onto others, but by understanding, accepting, and allowing our differences to bring us together. That being said, my point is that, I don’t believe that the gentleman being interviewed was so much expressing an anti-Muslim view when he, himself is a Muslim, so much as he was being extremely careful to toe a careful line on what he felt was politically acceptable. He obviously lacks integrity as well as a spine - which was made crystal clear through his vague, political, double-speak. Hamza, be YOU and keep believing; people like you do, and will continue to, make this world a better place.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!