Episodes

  • Final Destination (2000) with co-host Sarah
    Nov 4 2024

    Sarah had never seen a single Final Destination film. Sean cleared the schedule to get these reviews done.

    Sarah will get her own back soon with 'Sarah decides'.


    Will Sarah remain unimpressed by Sean's choice of film?


    Discussion Points:

    -Sean nearly gets killed by a bookcase.

    -Sarah was surprised by how good this film was.

    -The origin of the film's premise.

    -Sean tries not to spoil any of the upcoming sequels for Sarah.

    -How well-written the characters are in this film.

    -Sean apologises for his use of the word 're-writed'.

    -The brilliant practical effects.

    -Sarah enjoyed the lingering deaths, as opposed to the 'blink and miss it' deaths seen in Alien Romulus.

    -The depiction of survivors guilt.

    -Sarah talks about looking into a bus driver's eyes.


    Raised Questions:

    -Where's the Woo-Woo Sarah?

    -Should you set off Party Poppers during a podcast episode?

    -Do you enjoy teen-focused horror films?

    -Does this film feel like an extended, early season episode of Buffy for you?

    -Does death have a design for us all?

    -How did this avoid being another sh*tty teen-angst horror film?

    -Did the Final Destination series ever drop the ball?


    *-James Wan did the Saw films, not James Wong.


    Coming Soon:

    -Final Destination 2 (2003).

    -Final Destination 3 (2006).

    -The Final Destination (2009).

    -Final Destination 5 (2011).


    Thanks for Listening!


    Find us here:

    X: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 17 mins
  • Threads (1984)
    Oct 28 2024

    This is a grim one, but it's a film you need to see!


    A British kitchen sink drama set in Sheffield in 1983, which follows a young couple expecting their first child before a nuclear war interrupts their plans.


    Sean and Sarah review one of the most-unflinching and best British TV films of all time.

    Will they remain unimpressed by their choice of film?


    Warning: This podcast episodes contains descriptions of some of the shocking events in the film.


    Discussion Points:

    -Sarah and Sean forgot how bleak this film is.

    -How timely this film feels in 2024, even though it was made in 1984.

    -The impact of this film when it was first released.

    -How unnerving this film is.

    -Sean wonders whether they should have chosen this film.

    -The British Soap Creme-de-le-creme of actors.

    -Just how much the British underestimated the impact of a nuclear bomb.

    -Sarah debuts her Northern impression.

    -Sarah discusses the power of background events bubbling over so "abruptly and quickly", describing it as "masterful" and "amazing".

    -Sarah describes the power of the small character moments, which make the film so special.

    -The effects on the post-war generation and the complete lack of social cohesion is highlighted by Sarah.

    -Sean wonders if humans would become functionally extinct; when a species reaches such a low level of members that it will inevitably become extinct, as it is unable to replenish it's numbers.


    Raised Questions:

    -Will this film change the trajectory of your day?

    -How bad is Sean's Sheffield accent?

    -Is there anything better than an upper class English voice heralding your doom?

    -Does watching this film make you extra British?

    -Why did they show Threads (1984) to school children?

    -Does this film make you want to stop making jokes?

    -Was this film the death knell for many high street shops?

    -Did they need to make it seem survivable?

    -It's not good when they quietly store away the paintings is it?

    -Is this the best thing that the BBC has ever made?


    Thanks for Listening!

    Get in touch:

    We would love to hear your thoughts on Threads (1984). Let us know what you thought of the film and our podcast review!


    Find us here:

    Twitter: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 17 mins
  • Rush Hour 2 (2001) with Randy & Steve from 'The Decision Reel'
    Oct 21 2024

    Randy and Steve return to continue the Rush Hour reviews with Rush Hour 2 (2001).


    Watch your egg rolls, we're going in!


    Discussion Points:

    -Sean's notes are abysmal again.

    -The lack of seriousness in this film.

    -Chris Tucker's dancing.

    -The reason Jackie Chan doesn't like the way he speaks in English in this film.

    -A brief history of '7 11' shops (Not Sponsored).

    -Behind the biggest mouth in the West is a damn good cop with Tucker.

    -Steve thinks this film is better than the original film.


    Raised Questions:

    -Does this film start straight after Rush Hour?

    -The most obvious bomb-planting scene ever?

    -What is the British version of a '7 11'?

    -Where did they park the SS Minnow Johnson?

    -How has Randy never seen The Terminator (1984)?


    The impressions of Chris Tucker, Jackie Chan, Owen Wilson, Christopher Walken and President Donald Trump (You weren't expecting him were you!) are purely imitations of the performances in the film, or in real life, and not said with any malicious intent and no offence is meant.

    The impressions of President Donald Trump are not any remark about American Politics, this is a English podcast, we're not interested.


    Thanks for Listening!


    Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!


    Find us here:

    Twitter: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    54 mins
  • Float (2019) with Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast'
    Oct 14 2024

    Luke from 'The Nerdstalgic Podcast' returns to join Sean and discuss the Disney-Pixar short film, Float (2019).

    Float is a short six-minute film which highlights the importance of difference and acceptance, by following a Father coming to terms with his young son, who 'floats'.


    Chapters:

    0:00-Welcome and Introduction of this Week's Guest.

    25:51-The Power of Acceptance.

    45:07-The Impact of Representation.

    50:20-Closing Thoughts and Recommendations.


    Thanks for Listening!


    Find us here:

    X: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    50 mins
  • Jojo Rabbit (2019) with Jackson from 'History with Jackson'
    Oct 10 2024

    Jackson from 'History with Jackson' joins Sean to discuss one of his favourite films:

    Jojo Rabbit (2019).


    Jackson and Sean use the film as a framework to delve into the world of Nazi Germany, totalitarian regimes and how this film stays funny and effective, whilst dealing with such a grim subject matter.


    Guest: https://historywithjackson.co.uk/


    Discussion Points:

    -The unique and weird tone of the film.

    -Jackson and Sean discuss some of the criticism aimed at the film.

    -The power of humour.

    -Sean compares the films opening to Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (1997).

    -Sean and Jackson dive into totalitarian regimes, indoctrination and the cult of personalities.

    -Taika Watiti's portrayal of Adolf Hitler.

    -The lasting memory of Occupation.

    -The role of women in Nazi Germany.

    -The strong performances and dialogue of Jojo Rabbit.

    -The power of 'doing what we can' and the power of love.


    Raised Questions:

    -Do overwhelming positive reviews put you off seeing a film?

    -How do you tackle such a depressing and serious subject?

    -Is this film a good place to introduce this subject to new generations?

    -Does a good cast guarantee a good film?

    -Which line did Sean really not like?

    -Why didn't Nazi Germany collapse sooner?

    -Did you expect an Augustus Gloop impression in this review?

    -How is this film THIS funny, given the subject matter?

    -Has the term 'Nazi' been diluted and devalued?


    Thanks for Listening!


    Find us here:

    X: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 33 mins
  • Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy 2 (2000) with Peter Rose from 'Mummy Movie Podcast'
    Oct 7 2024

    As Sarah is feeling under the weather, Sean is joined by Peter Rose to review Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy 2 (2000).


    The film was originally released as 'Ancient Evil: Scream of the Mummy' in America and Mexico, and has no links to 'Bram Stoker's Legend of the Mummy' (1998).


    Welcome to Review It Yourself: The Podcast with the Sigh. Film reviews for the eternally unimpressed.


    Will Sean and Peter be impressed or unimpressed?


    Discussion Points:

    -Sometimes you've just got to be brutally honest.

    -Peter and Sean do their best to find the positives.

    -The DVD blurb reading returns, and the DVD chapters are discovered.

    -The sheer lack of preservation protocol in this film.

    -Peter brings interesting facts about Aztecs.


    Raised Questions:

    -How did Sean watch this multiple times on Sky Movies?

    -Is this a "So-bad-it's-good" film?

    -How can an 85 minute film feel so slow?

    -When did 'Animated Menu' stop being classed as a DVD Special Feature?

    -Is this film a "Pound Shop Version of Halloween H20"?

    -Why would you kick a door open when you're trying to put something back secretly?

    -After 100 Mummy film reviews, what is the worst film Peter has watched?


    Recommendations:

    -Rough Air: Danger on Flight 534 (2001). Sean has already reviewed this film if you want to check it out.


    Thanks for Listening!


    Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!


    Find us here:

    Twitter: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 2 mins
  • Preview It Yourself 4: Gladiator II (2024)
    Sep 30 2024

    Which film trailer/previews make you want to spend your hard earned cash at the cinema?


    Let Sean and Sarah help with that, by reviewing trailers for upcoming films and a few old favourites.

    Welcome to Preview it Yourself.


    This time around, Sean decides to show Sarah the trailer for Gladiator II (2024). He apologises first.


    Discussion Points:

    -Lower your expectations.

    -The long muted Gladiator sequel ideas.

    -The justification for making the film.

    -The horrendous soundtrack for the trailer and why Hans Zimmer hasn't returned to score this film.

    -Whether the cast can elevate this film like Russell Crowe did with the original.

    -Sean and Sarah also review the Gladiator (2000) trailer.

    -A mini-review of The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008).

    -Sarah and Sean try to remain positive.

    -The downgrade from tiger to rhinoceros.

    -Sean and Sarah agree to eat humble pie if the film is good.


    Raised Questions:

    -Is it mean to make someone watch this trailer?

    -Have we gone backwards in making films?

    -Who the hell signed off on the music?

    -Why does the trailer make the film seem like a pantomime?

    -Why would you even dare to make a sequel to such a behemoth of cinema?

    -Would you watch "Aqueduct Shark"?

    -Did the Romans ever have two Emperors at once?

    -Is the cast of Gladiator II too big?

    -Why does Sarah refuse to go camping?


    Quotes of the episode:

    -"What the f**k is this film meant to be?".

    -"If this film is better than Gladiator (2000) then I will shut the podcast down".

    -"This is so 2024 it hurts...what are you doing!?".

    -"I'm making a lot of assumptions on [an awful] trailer".

    -"I don't think people know how to make trailers anymore".


    Shout-out to Dan from Casting Views for his feedback on this Preview It Yourself side-series.


    Thanks for Listening!


    Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!

    Find us here:

    Twitter: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    47 mins
  • Jaws: The Revenge (1987) with Paul from 'History Rage'
    Sep 23 2024

    Sean, Sarah and Paul from 'History Rage' reach the final, pitiful end of the Jaws franchise.


    Discussion Points:

    -Sean didn't feel this was that bad.

    -The DVD read-through returns.

    -Paul finds the DVD cover description hilarious.

    -The serious lack of deaths in this film.

    -Sarah sends her thoughts in for Paul and Sean to discuss.

    -Sean was really with the film... for 12 minutes.

    -Sean compares the sharks in Jaws and Jaws: The Revenge to pigeons.

    -Paul and Sean can't abide the Michael Brody character.

    -Sean doesn't like being pestered.


    Raised Questions:

    -Did Sean watch a different film?

    -Has Sarah binned off the podcast for work or because it's Jaws: The Revenge?

    -Where are the deaths?

    -Can Ellen Brody actually cry?

    -How many flashback does a 90-minute film need?

    -How much do they love Christmas in Amity?

    -Why does the coffin look so fake?

    -Is the shark nose-heavy?

    -Is your Dad a binfluencer?

    -Why "Tourist on the Loose"?


    Thanks for Listening!


    Review It Yourself is now on YouTube!


    Find us here:

    Twitter: @YourselfReview

    Instagram: reviewityourselfpodcast2021

    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ReviewItYourself⁠


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Show more Show less
    1 hr and 10 mins