• SCOTUS’s Endless Beef with the EPA

  • Oct 21 2024
  • Length: 1 hr and 4 mins
  • Podcast
  • 2.0 out of 5 stars (1 rating)

SCOTUS’s Endless Beef with the EPA

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • Melissa, Kate, and Leah recap October at the Supreme Court, diving into the sewage-infested waters of City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency. What did clean water ever do to Brett Kavanaugh? Also recapped: cases about the judicial review of immigration visas and veterans benefits. Finally, the hosts finish off with a peek at what’s going on in state courts around the country.

    • Follow us on Instagram, Twitter, Threads, and Bluesky
    Show more Show less
Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about SCOTUS’s Endless Beef with the EPA

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 2 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    0
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    0
  • 4 Stars
    1
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 1 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    0
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for DRobinson

biased

As a general rule, I appreciate the approach and framing as many times they are a fair representation of the case's oral argument. even if skewed, it's accurate.

This week's presentation of the EPA case seemingly relies on 15 second clips posted to Twitter and out of context. It doesn't convey the majority argument, even if they disagree with it, and doesn't explain to the listener why there are concerns.

At one point, they suggest the justices were calling for the end of the EPA solely because they asked the agency a question about torts. A complete attempt to mislead.

Report this

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!