The idea that saturated fat might be harmful to our health has sparked controversy for decades. In recent years, counter-narratives have surged: suggesting that concerns over saturated fat were overblown, that LDL cholesterol doesn’t matter, or that the original diet-heart hypothesis has been debunked. These claims have become especially popular in online wellness spaces and certain dietary communities, often wrapped in compelling but misleading rhetoric.

So what does the best available evidence actually say? And how should we think about saturated fat, LDL cholesterol, and cardiovascular risk in the current day?

In this wide-ranging interview, originally recorded for the Chasing Clarity podcast, Alan and Danny explore the scientific consensus around saturated fat’s impact on blood lipids, why LDL and apoB are central to atherosclerotic disease, and how dietary patterns can meaningfully reduce risk.

Importantly, they also address some of the most persistent myths and half-truths that fuel confusion, from flawed interpretations of the Seven Countries Study to misrepresentations of newer meta-analyses.

• [03:41] How do we know saturated fat impacts LDL-C?
• [05:28] Metabolic ward studies and key findings
• [11:13] The Keys equation and subsequent research
• [17:17] Epidemiology and long-term studies
• [31:48] The Seven Countries Study
• [44:25] Understanding the impact of saturated fat on blood lipids
• [47:23] Historical and research perspectives on saturated fat
• [50:43] Practical dietary strategies for improving blood lipids
• [53:48] The Portfolio Diet and other dietary interventions
• [58:07] The role of pharmacology in managing blood lipids
• [01:00:58] Addressing misconceptions and common claims
• [01:13:57] Key ideas segment (premium-only)

• Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium
• Join the Sigma email newsletter for free
• Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course
• Alan Flanagan’s Alinea Nutrition Education Hub
• Related episodes to add to your podcast queue: 532, 525, 515, 493, 481, 439

For decades, dietary guidelines—and the Food Pyramid in particular—have been at the center of heated debates and considerable controversy. These guidelines have often been accused of being influenced by industry interests, oversimplifying nutritional nuance, or even directly contributing to rising obesity and metabolic disease rates.

In this episode, we critically assess common claims surrounding the Food Pyramid, including whether it was truly shaped by vested industry interests, if it encouraged harmful dietary shifts toward excessive carbohydrate and sugar consumption, and whether the subsequent health outcomes seen at the population level can be fairly attributed to these guidelines.

Additionally, we evaluate the role of the sugar industry in funding key studies and publications, examining the implications such conflicts of interest may have had on nutritional science.

Drawing on historical context, rigorous examination of scientific evidence, and an evaluation of how nutritional recommendations have evolved, this discussion aims to clarify misunderstandings, highlight legitimate criticisms, and separate fact from persistent myths regarding dietary guidance and its implications for health.

• [01:37] Common claims and narratives
• [03:15] Historical context of dietary guidelines
• [21:57] Sugar industry influence on dietary research
• [36:17] The mcgovern report
• [40:49] Misconceptions about dietary guidelines
• [44:28] Changes in food supply and consumption
• [58:15] Critiques and conflicts of interest
• [01:06:47] Key ideas segment (Premium-only)

Links & Resources

• Go to episode page (with linked resources)
• Subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium
• Join the Sigma email newsletter for free
• Do you want to be skilled in reading nutrition studies? Enroll in the next cohort of our Applied Nutrition Literacy course
• Alan Flanagan’s Alinea Nutrition Education Hub
• MASS Research Review - latest training and nutrition research relevant to strength trainees
• Examine is the best online database for looking at the evidence of diets, foods and supplements on a range of health outcomes.