https://www.zaslavskylaw.com/

212-390-0076

Attorney David Zaslavsky recently appeared on The Attorney Post, shedding light on the complicated world of family and matrimonial law in New York. Practicing since 2003, Zaslavsky leads David Zaslavsky PLLC, a firm known for handling high-stakes custody cases, including those involving the Administration for Children’s Services (ACS).

Zaslavsky is one of just a few private attorneys in New York equipped to manage both matrimonial cases and legal issues involving ACS. This dual expertise is rare and vital, especially when families find themselves under scrutiny by child protection agencies.

During the episode, Zaslavsky spoke candidly about how his path to law began in middle school, eventually leading to degrees from NYU and Brooklyn Law School. Early experience in family law solidified his passion for the field, which often requires court appearances multiple times per week.

The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges for family law. Court closures in 2020 led to significant delays, while the shift to virtual proceedings left room for miscommunication and legal missteps. Zaslavsky described a rise in custody disputes, particularly around unauthorized parental relocations during lockdowns—many of which are still playing out in court today.

One segment of the episode focused on international custody disputes. Zaslavsky explained how navigating custody cases across borders can become impossible if the destination country is not a signatory to the Hague Convention, as is the case with China and Russia. In such situations, retrieving children may require embassy involvement and months of litigation.

He also raised concerns about the systemic incentives within child protective services. With federal funding tied to foster care placements, Zaslavsky questioned whether financial motivations might influence agency decisions. Low staffing standards and high turnover further complicate the quality of services provided to families.

The episode also touched on New York’s controversial child support laws. Zaslavsky criticized the way payments are calculated—based on gross income without adjusting for federal withholding—which often creates financial pressure on noncustodial parents. This issue is worsened by the city’s high cost of living, leaving many parents struggling to meet court-ordered obligations.

Zaslavsky pointed out that many clients unknowingly sabotage their cases through social media. Courts now use online content as evidence, and posts that show lavish spending can contradict claims of financial hardship, undermining credibility.

Despite these hurdles, Zaslavsky emphasized that most family law cases should be settled rather than litigated. He recommends settlement in nearly every case, not just for strategic reasons, but also to minimize emotional stress for the families involved.

Throughout the podcast, Zaslavsky stressed the importance of proactive legal counsel, especially in custody and ACS-related cases. His insights revealed not only the complexity of family law, but also the urgent need for reforms that better protect parents and children alike.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology

https://sobolaw.com/

855‑468‑7626

Greg Sobo, head of the nationally recognized firm Law Offices of Sobo & Sobo L.L.P., joined The Attorney Post to discuss the evolution of personal injury law, client-centered practice, and the impact of legal reform. With over 15 years of experience and a growing firm that spans several states, Sobo shared a wide range of insights into litigation, legal ethics, and leadership.

Law Offices of Sobo & Sobo L.L.P., founded in 1969, maintains a 98% success rate for accepted cases. With offices in New York, New Jersey, and Illinois, and a team of over 70 attorneys, the firm’s expansion under Greg’s leadership reflects its growing impact and commitment to helping injury victims nationwide.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Law Offices of Sobo & Sobo L.L.P. navigated court closures by leveraging virtual tools like Zoom for depositions and mediations. While these remote processes kept cases moving, Greg emphasized that virtual trials lack key elements—like eye contact and jury engagement—that influence outcomes.

In one case, Greg recounted how a judge dismissed proceedings based on an opening statement, a decision that raised concerns about fairness and access to justice. While the case wasn’t appealed, it demonstrated how trials can influence broader societal changes, such as improving school safety.

Greg also discussed legal challenges posed by self-driving vehicles and the rise of medical malpractice cases. He noted that while cars are safer today, liability issues remain complicated when accidents involve autonomous technology. Similarly, the legal system makes it difficult to pursue claims for medical errors, even though a Johns Hopkins study suggests malpractice may cause 250,000 deaths annually.

One legislative issue Greg hopes to change is New York’s wrongful death law, which hasn’t been updated in over a century. The current statute allows compensation only for financial loss—not emotional suffering. This outdated approach, he argues, fails to reflect the true value of human life and leaves grieving families without just recourse.

Sobo also challenged misconceptions about injury lawyers, noting that many clients initially hesitate to seek help due to stigma or fear. At Law Offices of Sobo & Sobo L.L.P., building trust and empathy is central to every client interaction.

Now serving as CEO, Greg faces a new set of challenges managing a growing team and maintaining firm culture. He advised young lawyers to worry less and focus on serving clients with clarity and compassion.

In a profession often driven by risk and complexity, Greg Sobo continues to lead with conviction—offering a clear example of what modern legal advocacy can look like.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology

https://www.robertnkatz.com/

(888) 426-2100

(404) 460-0101

In a compelling episode of The Attorney Post, personal injury attorney Robert N. Katz opened up about his decades-long legal career, his firm’s client-first approach, and the broader challenges facing the justice system. As founder of Katz Personal Injury Lawyers, Katz has spent 37 years representing victims of catastrophic injuries across Georgia and the U.S., including cases involving brain injuries, medical malpractice, and wrongful death.

Putting the Client First

At the core of Katz’s practice is a deep commitment to client care. He emphasized the importance of making clients feel heard, supported, and empowered—especially during life-altering events like serious accidents or false arrests. His firm adopts a hands-on approach to communication, tailoring contact frequency to suit each client’s needs and using a combination of calls, emails, Zoom, and in-person meetings to stay in touch.

For clients worried about the cost of legal representation, Katz relies on the contingency fee model—a structure that allows people to pursue justice without upfront legal fees. “Most people can’t afford a $500-per-hour attorney,” he explained. “Contingency fees exist to level the playing field and ensure access to justice.”

Navigating Complex Legal Battles

Katz’s experience spans a wide array of legal challenges, including medical negligence, drunk driving fatalities, and false arrest cases. He has helped clients recover from devastating situations, such as one case where a client was wrongfully jailed for weeks due to an inability to post $1,500 in bail—a tragic reminder of how economic disparities can translate into prolonged injustice.

He also noted the difficulty of litigating against hospitals and healthcare providers. “Medical malpractice is often the third leading cause of death,” Katz said, referencing a Johns Hopkins study. Still, he acknowledged that these cases are often met with intense resistance and face additional barriers like damage caps. In Georgia, for instance, wrongful death claims can be limited to $250,000 per defendant—a figure Katz says fails to reflect the true loss endured by grieving families.

The Role of Technology in Modern Legal Practice

Katz spoke about how the legal profession adapted during the COVID-19 pandemic. His team transitioned to remote work just days before Georgia’s shutdown and embraced platforms like Zoom for depositions and mediations. Even post-pandemic, Katz finds virtual mediation an effective tool for resolving disputes, especially in cases involving complex or sensitive details.

Legal System Challenges and Reform

Throughout the conversation, Katz emphasized the need for systemic legal reform. He criticized the overuse of bifurcated trials in Georgia, which he believes place undue burdens on jurors and litigants, as well as tort reform laws that cap damages in a way that undervalues human life.

A Life of Service and Dedication

Katz’s legal legacy is defined by both professional success and a sense of duty. He has tried and settled numerous high-stakes cases and has been consistently recognized for his excellence, including being named to the Top 100 Georgia Super Lawyers list. As a certified mediator and arbitrator, he brings a nuanced understanding to negotiations, allowing him to guide cases to resolution both in and out of court.

With nearly four decades in the field, Robert Katz remains a steadfast advocate for fairness, transparency, and compassion in personal injury law. His appearance on The Attorney Post offers a powerful reminder that behind every case is a person—and that the pursuit of justice must always center on the needs of those most affected.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology

https://www.dbllawyers.com/

800.747.9354

In a fast-evolving technological era, artificial intelligence is transforming industries—and the legal field is no exception. On a recent episode of The Attorney Post, intellectual property attorney Thomas Dunlap of Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig joined the discussion to break down the legal complexities of AI, patent law, and the future of IP protection in a digital-first world.

Thomas Dunlap leads a national law firm with nearly 80 attorneys and offices in Washington D.C., New York, Seattle, Chicago, and Delaware. His practice is rooted in intellectual property litigation, with a strong emphasis on patent portfolios held by inventors and universities. Dunlap represents patent holders in enforcement actions, often backed by litigation funders—a model that's becoming increasingly necessary as litigation costs continue to rise.

Although Dunlap’s background is in traditional IP law, he’s become deeply involved in AI law due to the growing number of legal grey areas surrounding artificial intelligence. The lack of specific U.S. legislation governing AI, particularly in IP, is creating both opportunity and uncertainty for attorneys and innovators alike.

A central issue Dunlap addresses is the legal identity of AI in the context of inventorship. As of now, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has clarified that while AI can assist in the invention process, only human beings can be listed as inventors. Consequently, AI-generated inventions are considered public domain unless a human makes the inventive leap.

This has profound implications for businesses investing in AI-driven R&D. While countries like South Africa and Saudi Arabia have granted patents to AI systems, the U.S. remains firm in its human-inventor requirement—raising questions about international IP protection, ownership, and enforceability.

The High Cost of Defending Innovation

Beyond AI, Dunlap highlighted systemic flaws in the U.S. patent system. Small inventors, despite contributing to over 60% of innovation, are often outmatched by large tech companies. Patent litigation can easily cost $4–8 million, making it financially impossible for independent innovators to protect their ideas without support from litigation funders.

Dunlap pointed to a high-profile case involving a small company's EKG monitoring technology being used in Apple Watches, underscoring how large corporations can leverage legal and financial muscle to challenge or invalidate legitimate patents. This is part of what he calls the “invalidated” era, where inventors face an uphill battle in enforcing their rights.

AI’s Disruptive Power in Legal Practice

While AI poses legal dilemmas, it’s also reshaping the way lawyers work. According to Dunlap, tools that previously required five associates over a week can now be accomplished by three associates in just five days, thanks to AI-enhanced e-discovery systems. But he warns that overreliance on AI for document review still carries risks—missed keywords or misinterpreted nuance can drastically affect outcomes.

Moreover, Dunlap noted that courts may begin to limit AI training on copyrighted materials, potentially restricting the development of AI tools. If copyright constraints tighten, AI systems might only be able to train on pre-1950s content, greatly reducing their value and utility across industries.

Thomas Dunlap's insights make it clear that the legal system is at a crossroads. The collision of AI and intellectual property is forcing courts, lawyers, and lawmakers to rethink longstanding definitions of creativity, authorship, and ownership. As AI continues to revolutionize industries, those at the forefront of IP law—like Dunlap—will be pivotal in shaping the future of innovation.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology

https://kc-attorney.com/

913-934-NEED (6333)

816-934-NEED (6333)

On a recent episode of The Attorney Post, the spotlight shined on Kansas City personal injury attorney Jerry Wallentine. With 19 years of legal experience and a firm that spans both Kansas and Missouri, Jerry brings a unique perspective to personal injury law—one shaped by his earlier life as a full-time minister.

Dual-State Legal Services

Jerry’s firm, Wallentine Law, focuses on car accidents and other personal injury claims. Whether you’re in Kansas or Missouri, the firm is just a phone call away:

• 913-934-NEED (Kansas)
• 816-934-NEED (Missouri)

Faith-Informed Legal Advocacy

Although his law firm doesn’t market itself as Christian, Jerry’s faith subtly informs his work. He prays with clients when asked and operates with deep empathy—qualities that carried over from his ministry days.

Legal Excellence Rooted in Experience

Jerry has represented over 1,000 clients and isn’t afraid to take on the hard cases.

Wallentine Law also employs a medical expert with ER experience to ensure clients’ injuries are properly understood and valued.

Challenges in the Legal Landscape

From Zoom trials that lack jury-connection cues to outdated policy limits set back in 1984, Jerry sees a legal system in need of modernization. He’s also concerned about how AI and autonomous vehicles will affect liability law in the future.

Key Advice for Accident Victims

• Seek medical attention immediately—adrenaline can hide injuries.
• Contact a lawyer early to avoid missing deadlines.
• Know your jurisdiction—jury awards vary drastically between counties.

A Mission of Helping Others

Jerry Wallentine’s story is about more than legal wins—it’s about helping people through some of the hardest moments of their lives. Whether guiding clients through medical bills or advocating in court, his work reflects a deeper commitment to justice and integrity.

If you need help after a car accident in Kansas or Missouri, you’ll find more than legal help with Wallentine Law—you’ll find a team that cares.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology

https://youtu.be/iwBFfy7miWA

https://www.henningmediation.com/index.php

(770) 955-2252

On The Attorney Post, Nigel Wright, a leading mediator at Henning Mediation and Arbitration Services, shared valuable lessons from his 30-year career spanning insurance, reinsurance, and commercial disputes. Also an adjunct professor at Emory Law School, Wright brings a depth of experience and a commitment to developing the next generation of legal professionals.

Building a Career Across Two Continents

Starting in the U.K. and later establishing himself in Atlanta, Wright’s career reflects international exposure and a nuanced understanding of complex disputes. Joining Henning, Atlanta’s gold standard mediation firm, positioned him at the heart of transformative changes in dispute resolution.

The pandemic accelerated the shift toward virtual mediations, and Wright quickly adapted, noting both the advantages and the limitations of digital platforms in fostering settlements.

Risk Management and Emotional Awareness

One of Wright’s key insights is the role of emotions in mediation. From injured plaintiffs to corporate executives, emotional investment often clouds risk assessment. Wright stressed that setting realistic expectations early is crucial to avoiding impasse.

He noted the unpredictability of outcomes: even well-prepared cases sometimes fail, and underdog cases sometimes prevail, underscoring the inherent uncertainty in litigation.

The Role of the Mediator: Trust and Neutrality

Choosing the right mediator can make or break a case. Wright urged parties to vet their mediators carefully, ensuring true neutrality and strong reputations for confidentiality.

He also addressed the challenges posed by multi-party mediations, emphasizing that careful pre-mediation outreach helps manage competing interests and align expectations.

Adapting to Global and Local Trends

Drawing from international experience, Wright discussed the importance of cultural sensitivity when mediating across borders. However, he warned that understanding culture should not compromise the rigor of evaluating claims and defenses.

He also reflected on recent tort reform measures, expressing concern about their potential impact on mediation success rates and litigation costs.

Nigel Wright’s approach to mediation is clear: success hinges on preparation, emotional intelligence, and fostering trust. As mediation becomes the dominant mode of dispute resolution, his insights offer critical guidance for attorneys, clients, and future mediators alike.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology

https://youtu.be/YL_Z2OD0PiQ

https://www.theattorneypost.com/nigel-wright-breaks-down-mediation-misconceptions-legal-strategy-global-dispute-resolution/

https://rfinjurylaw.com/

(212) 725-5755

On The Attorney Post, William Ricigliano of RF Injury Law discussed his decades-long journey in personal injury law, with a special focus on traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Practicing in New York and New Jersey, Ricigliano emphasized that trust and outcomes define client relationships—particularly when representing those grappling with life-altering injuries.

The pandemic initially stalled the firm's expansion into New Jersey, but Ricigliano adapted quickly, introducing a mobile office with conferencing capabilities. This flexibility ensured continued client service despite courtroom closures.

Early career setbacks, like losing his first trial, fueled Ricigliano’s passion for continuous learning. Today, TBI cases account for about 70% of his practice. He discussed the challenge of proving invisible injuries to juries and the importance of helping jurors understand that personal injury awards are about securing a client's future—not delivering rewards.

Ricigliano also addressed negative perceptions of personal injury attorneys. Acknowledging the profession’s mixed reputation, he stressed that true trial lawyers bring immense technical skill and genuine advocacy to their work.

His work extends beyond the courtroom. Through involvement with charities like St. Jude’s and community initiatives like Bronx-based toy drives, Ricigliano reflects his firm’s broader commitment to serving those in need.

As he looks ahead, Ricigliano calls for reforms in wrongful death laws and urges injured individuals to seek attorneys who not only have courtroom experience but also demonstrate compassion and integrity.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology

https://youtu.be/zxJPYz8KDQY

https://www.theattorneypost.com/the-verdict-matters-william-ricigliano-talks-tbi-laws-jury-trials-client-advocacy/

https://www.henningmediation.com/index.php

(770) 955-2252

Mediation has become a cornerstone of the legal system, resolving cases efficiently while avoiding costly and time-consuming trials. In a recent episode of The Attorney Post, Judge Randy Rich from Henning Mediation and Arbitration Services shared insights on the growing role of mediation, the evolution of jury verdicts, and the future of dispute resolution.

Judge Rich’s legal career spans years as a state and superior court judge in Georgia, overseeing civil, criminal, and business law cases. His transition to mediation reflects a broader legal shift—99% of cases now settle through mediation rather than going to trial.

Despite its effectiveness, mediation presents challenges. High-stakes cases, such as large financial disputes and personal injury claims, require careful negotiation and patience. Additionally, post-COVID, jury verdicts have shifted, with jurors awarding larger settlements and showing increased skepticism toward police testimony. These changes influence how parties approach mediation.

Judge Rich also discussed the impact of technology on dispute resolution. Virtual mediation is now common, but many professionals still prefer face-to-face negotiations. Moreover, the demand for qualified mediators is rising, particularly in complex business and family law disputes.

Reflecting on his career, Judge Rich acknowledged the difficult path to becoming a judge, having applied for positions numerous times before securing his first role. His perseverance highlights the competitive nature of judicial appointments.

As mediation continues to reshape the legal system, professionals like Judge Rich play a key role in ensuring fair and efficient dispute resolution. Henning Mediation remains at the forefront of this movement, setting the standard for high-quality arbitration and mediation services.

Sponsors:

• RankWith.News
• The Attorney Post
• National ERC
• Andropology