The Epstein Chronicles

By: Bobby Capucci
Listen for free

  • Summary

  • Jeffrey Epstein was a multi millionaire who had political and business ties to some of the most rich and powerful people in the world. From businessmen to politicians at the highest levels, Epstein broke bread with them all.

    Yet for years the Legacy media and the rest of high society looked the other way and ignored his behavior as multiple women came forward with allegations of abuse.

    Even after he was convicted and subsequently received a sweetheart deal those same so called elites welcomed him back with open arms.

    Now after his death and the arrest of Maxwell, the real story is starting to come together and the curtain has begun to be drawn back and what it has revealed is truly disturbing.

    From Princes to Ex Presidents, the cast of scoundrels in this play spans continents and political affiliations leaving us with a transcontinental criminal conspiracy possibly unlike any we have ever seen before.

    In this podcast we will explore all of the levels of Jeffrey Epstein and his criminal enterprise.

    From his most trusted assistants to obscure associates, we will leave no stone unturned as we swim through the muck searching for clarity and answers to some of the most pressing questions of the case.

    From interviews with people directly involved in the case to daily updates, the Epstein Chronicles will have it all.

    Just like our other project, The Jeffrey Epstein Show, you can expect no punches pulled and consistent content. We have covered the Epstein case daily(everyday since October 1st 2019) and will continue to do so until there are convictions. With a library of well over 1k shows, you can expect a ton of content coming your way including on scene reporting from the Maxwell trial and from places like Zorro Ranch.

    Thank you for tuning in and I look forward to having you all along for the ride.




    (Created and Hosted by Bobby Capucci)
    Copyright Bobby Capucci
    Show more Show less
Episodes
  • Organized Crime: Vic Amuso (9/29/24)

    Organized Crime: Vic Amuso (9/29/24)
    Sep 29 2024
    Vic Amuso, born in 1934 in Brooklyn, rose through the ranks of the Lucchese crime family to become one of New York’s most feared Mafia bosses. Alongside his ruthless ally Anthony "Gaspipe" Casso, Amuso took control of the family in 1986 through a violent coup, ruling with extreme paranoia and ordering numerous murders to eliminate any perceived threats. His reign was marked by brutal tactics, including the creation of a secret hit list and involvement in the notorious Windows Case, a multi-million dollar extortion scheme. After going on the run in 1991, Amuso was eventually captured and convicted of racketeering, extortion, and murder. Even behind bars, he continued to wield influence over the Lucchese family for years. His legacy as one of the last old-school Mafia bosses is defined by his violent rise to power, betrayal by his closest ally, and his enduring control from prison, making him a chilling symbol of organized crime’s bloody past.



    (commercial at 8:45)

    to contact me:


    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
  • Downfall Of Diddy Redux: Tyrone Blackburn And The Memo Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 6)

    Downfall Of Diddy Redux: Tyrone Blackburn And The Memo Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 6)
    Sep 29 2024
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)


    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    Show more Show less
    11 mins
  • Downfall Of Diddy Redux: Tyrone Blackburn And The Memo Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 5)

    Downfall Of Diddy Redux: Tyrone Blackburn And The Memo Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 5)
    Sep 29 2024
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 9:41)

    to contact me:

    bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
    Show more Show less
    13 mins
Politics & Government
Show more Show less

What listeners say about The Epstein Chronicles

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0
Story
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    0

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars
Profile Image for Mom2chrisnben

just do it. it's worth it

it was a no holds barred. I really liked it. highly recommend. I stand with Isreal.

Report this

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!