We recently uncovered overlooked facts and missteps around January 6 in a previous episode. This week, Sean and Ron are back to go even deeper into the case, examining the legal and political charges against Donald Trump and dissecting the unfolding repercussions of that day.

Picking up where we left off, federal criminal defense attorney Ron guides us through the latest controversies and delves into what these prosecutions reveal about our justice system.

This episode expands the conversation, looking into the specifics of Trump’s indictments and what might be motivating them.

With cases now approaching the Supreme Court, Ron shares his insights on presidential immunity, legal boundaries, and what constitutes a fair trial. Could the justice system be turning into a political weapon, and what might that mean for the future?

Sean and Ron also analyze two critical Supreme Court cases that could reshape the narrative around January 6, discussing their potential impact on future presidential immunity and the shocking reach of politically charged prosecutions.

Tune in to understand the forces at play and see beyond the surface of January 6 and how these cases could affect the political landscape for years to come.

Key Takeaways:

Introduction (00:00)

Questioning why Trump was indicted but Pelosi was not (02:33)

Breakdown of Capitol police actions on January 6 (06:40)

Fabrication of evidence in Trump’s impeachment hearings (09:19)

Public and media reactions worldwide to Trump’s indictments (15:36)

Discussion on the justice system’s politicization under Biden (18:35)

Analysis of Supreme Court rulings impacting Trump’s case (32:44)

Presidential immunity and its limits in political actions (45:54)

Potential outcomes if Trump is re-elected (52:08)

Calls for an end to political prosecutions in the justice system (1:14:16)

Additional Resources

Ron’s article on The Abercrombie & Fitch Case: https://plums-cheetah-dy5m.squarespace.com/blog/white-collar-defense-1

The Sarbanes Oxley Act: https://sarbanes-oxley-act.com/

Trump increasing support from African American and Latino Americans: https://www.vox.com/2024-elections/373535/3-theories-gop-donald-trump-nonwhite-voters-hispanic-black-latino-asian

Part 1 of this conversation: https://youtu.be/t1J_sR-dGjk

Let’s Connect:

Connect with Ron: https://twitter.com/ronchapmanatty

Connect with Sean: https://twitter.com/ComplianceGuy73

—

The Wall protects our republic on our relentless strive for democracy.

With over 50 years of legal and government experience combined, Ron Chapman and Sean Weiss strip back the curtain on the US government, the Supreme Court, and some of the most influential trials in history that continue to shape our nation today.

Join every week for unfiltered conversations, in-depth analysis, and commentary from some of America’s boldest thought leaders.

As we look back on the recent election, many are left asking—how secure is our democratic process?

In this post-election episode, Sean and Ron take you behind the headlines to explore the legal challenges defining U.S. elections.

With Ron’s expertise in constitutional law, they both dive into the “willful blindness” doctrine, a growing trend in criminal law with massive implications for election integrity.

What’s more, the Department of Justice has quietly rolled out an Election Threats Task Force. Sounds like something out of a novel, right? But it’s very real and could have a profound effect on future elections. Sean and Ron also talk about how this federal task force interacts with state-run elections and why it’s causing quite a stir.

With recent rulings from the Supreme Court and local courts, this episode provides insights into how these developments might impact the democratic process.

If you’re concerned about the future of democracy in America, this episode is a must-listen.

Key Takeaways:

Introduction (00:00)

Context around election integrity (00:31)

Explanation of "willful blindness" and its legal relevance (02:01)

Legal Implications of DOJ’s Election Threats Task Force (08:45)

Examination of January 6 events and federal response (21:25)

Impact of election result certifications on federal oversight (40:54)

Differences between state and federal jurisdiction in election laws (44:25)

Discussion on the necessity of election certifiers' autonomy (59:10)

Debate over the role of comedy and free speech (1:07:14)

Summary of Virginia case on non-citizen voter removal (1:11:54)

Additional Resources

Fifth Circuit Mississippi Case: https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/mypmbgqqevr/10252024mississippi.pdf

Mi Familia Vota v Fontes https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68966773/mi-familia-vota-et-al-v-petersen-et-al/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

The Georgia State Election Board Controversy: https://www.gpb.org/news/2024/09/03/the-georgia-state-election-board-controversy-explained

Let’s Connect:

Connect with Ron: https://twitter.com/ronchapmanatty

Connect with Sean: https://twitter.com/ComplianceGuy73

—

The Wall protects our republic on our relentless strive for democracy.

With over 50 years of legal and government experience combined, Ron Chapman and Sean Weiss strip back the curtain on the US government, the Supreme Court, and some of the most influential trials in history that continue to shape our nation today.

Join every week for unfiltered conversations, in-depth analysis, and commentary from some of America’s boldest thought leaders.

When we think about the American military, we often imagine it as a shield protecting us from external threats.

But a new, nearly unnoticed change to Department of Defense policy has just authorized military force against civilians—right here in the U.S.

Is the government preparing for something sinister?

In this episode of The Wall, we break down exactly what this policy means for you and why it should be front-page news. From legal loopholes to constitutional violations, we explore why this directive could be the spark that ignites major unrest—and how it’s all being quietly set in motion under the radar.

The change in the use-of-force policy allows lethal military force to be used against U.S. civilians during civil disturbances, raising alarms about its vague parameters and timing—less than a month before a crucial election.

Ron, drawing on his experience as a Marine Corps attorney, explains how the policy bypasses previous safeguards that prevented the military from intervening in domestic matters. Sean provides a historical perspective, emphasizing the potential for this to destabilize American democracy if misused.

DoD Directive 5240.01 could have serious consequences, undermining constitutional rights and increasing the likelihood of violence during times of civil unrest.

Don’t let this slip past you. Tune in for a thought-provoking discussion on why this policy should matter more than ever and how it could impact us all.

Key Takeaways:

Introduction (00:00)

Why the policy change is hidden from public attention (01:30)

Overview of DoD’s Directive 5240.01 (12:21)

Vague parameters of DoD Directive 5240.01 (16:40)

Potential for abuse and constitutional violations (23:50)

Applicability of this DoD directive (32:05)

Concerns over the militarization of civil unrest (42:02)

Final thoughts and call to action (1:07:22)

Additional Resources

DOD DIRECTIVE 5240.01: https://www.esd.whs.mil/portals/54/documents/dd/issuances/dodd/524001p.pdf

Ronald W. Chapman Article - DoD Use of Force Policy: https://ronaldwchapman.com/blog/dod52401

Let’s Connect:

Connect with Ron: https://twitter.com/ronchapmanatty

Connect with Sean: https://twitter.com/ComplianceGuy73

—

The Wall protects our republic on our relentless strive for democracy.

With over 50 years of legal and government experience combined, Ron Chapman and Sean Weiss strip back the curtain on the US government, the Supreme Court, and some of the most influential trials in history that continue to shape our nation today.

Join every week for unfiltered conversations, in-depth analysis, and commentary from some of America’s boldest thought leaders.