Why Kata Are Not Self-Defence
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Why Kata Are Not Self-Defence
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
About this listen
In this episode of Great Karate Myths, Debunking the Legends, hosts Shanir, Tom and Nathan tackle the misconception that karate kata are designed for self-defence. They argue that kata, rooted in antique forms like Kusanku and Chinto, were primarily for pre-emptive control and weapon use, not reactive unarmed combat. Drawing on real-world violence footage and insights from self-defence expert Jeff Thompson, they highlight the chaotic, fast nature of real fights, which contrasts with the choreographed nature of kata. The hosts also explore how cultural influences, like Chinese stage combat, have skewed perceptions of kata’s purpose. They emphasize that kata are noble, functional tools for restraint, not brutality, and discuss their modern relevance in Ko-do Ryu, where spontaneous applications via pushing hands replace outdated self-defence fantasies.