
The Red Queen
Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $26.99
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Simon Prebble
-
By:
-
Matt Ridley
Referring to Lewis Carroll's Red Queen from Through the Looking-Glass, a character who has to keep running to stay in the same place, Matt Ridley demonstrates why sex is humanity's best strategy for outwitting its constantly mutating internal predators. The Red Queen answers dozens of other riddles of human nature and culture - including why men propose marriage, the method behind our maddening notions of beauty, and the disquieting fact that a woman is more likely to conceive a child by an adulterous lover than by her husband.
Brilliantly written, The Red Queen offers an extraordinary new way of interpreting the human condition and how it has evolved.
©1993 Matt Ridley (P)2011 HarperCollins PublishersListeners also enjoyed...




















People who viewed this also viewed...


















Perspective shifting
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Informative
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
However, I find that the author often falls into a reactionary trap of dismissing too much of the substance of arguments that differ in assumptions or details from his own point of view. Further, the author is often inconsistent about his own apparent principles regarding the appropriate weight that ought to be given to certain scientific studies. In one paragraph he can dismiss the entire premise of the fields of anthropology, sociology, and psychology while embracing without criticism results of studies in those fields which do happen to match up to his thesis.
And on numerous occasions the author is more than willing to make sweeping assumptions about potential sociological results because "everyone knows" what the answer would be--even while admitting there is no evidence on the subject either way. And in so doing he falls into the exact same traps he criticizes practitioners of those other disciplines for doing so. On one page, he rejects assumptions of anthropologists that lack evidence, and on the next he lambasts them for demanding strong evidence before changing how they do their research.
Finally, besides these numerous logical errors, cherry-picking, and conclusion-jumping, the author demonstrates an unfortunately sloppiness in style when he is willing to constantly assert "boys are X" and "women are Y" and "is it any surprise that boys do X better than girls" and vice versa. Yes, he's right that there are gender differences in psychology and average skill, but he's so interested in proving wrong the social scientists--who, prior to strong evidence becoming available otherwise, preferred to assume both genders thought in the same way--that he raises slight differences in averages into sweeping generalizations that are foundational to his arguments... at least when it suits him. Other times he takes great pains to point out that individuals vary when that helps his argument more.
Overall, not worth the listen. The reactionary tone leads to poor conclusions, and at this point the data is so outdated it's not worth cluttering your mind.
Great narrator, good history, poor conclusions
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
2. In all fairness, this was written in 1993 and many of the more recent studies documenting differences across races had not yet been discovered. The author sticks to a safe left wing view that racial differences can emerge in every other part of human physiognomy except the brain and behavior (!)
3. A few times he uses the scientific findings he reviews to suggest public policy recommendations. Every single time he supports left wing big government solutions. This is not science, it is partisan. No terrible, just funny when scientific types try to be objective.
4. Great book, stellar for 1993.
Solid Review Thru a Left Wing Lens
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Phenomenal
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Relevant information with skeptical insights
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Simon Prebble did very well, narrating such a touchy subject. I never got bored.
I would (and have) highly recommend this book in any medium to: geeks, biology students and evolution-deniers.
Thrilled
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
What did you love best about The Red Queen?
Detailed explanation of the underlying drivers behind the evolutionary basis for sex and gender.Any additional comments?
I am very interested in evolutionary theory and for me this book really hit the spot. Very detailed and interesting background on the basis for sex and gender in people and animals. Some might find this book somewhat offensive as it assumes both physical and mental differences between the sexes which goes against PC thinking but it is well justified and clearly explained.Great explanation of sex and gender
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I'm definitely not a biologist but found the concepts clearly outlined and broken down into digestible chapters.
A cacophony of information
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Enjoyed every Second of it
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.