LISTENER

Anonymous

  • 8
  • reviews
  • 2
  • helpful votes
  • 122
  • ratings

High school label essay

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
1 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 01-23-25

Painful. No images. No scholarship. It’s a high school paper that just won’t stop. It’s hard to imagine this author has more ch experience with his or her subject.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Lost patience

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-14-24

Took too long to develop. Several chapters in and the hero was still creating shopping lists.

Several questionable assumptions are also presented. Maybe it’s just a pet peeve, but bartering does not work and was never in evidence anywhere. It was never anything more than a very commonly held assumption.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

So incredibly sad

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 04-27-23

Within the first 20-minutes the author states absurd positions with respect to evolution repeating debunked claims and leaving us with yet another rendition of spirituality as nonsensical superstition.

I believe this interpretation does a massive disservice to Native American traditions. It amounts to a “christionized”, superstition infused, retelling of what might instead have been a legitimate approach to the role we play in the universe. It is clear to me this man never understood nature, mankind, and the interplay between the two.

This will appeal to the airy-fairy Castanadians looking for super powers and lacking any real appreciation for our relationship to the ecosystems we inhabit. Missed opportunity.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Outdated information

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 10-05-22

The research supporting this text appears to be a generation or more out of date.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The political organization lacks imagination

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 07-26-21

Okay, it’s a novel that at best bridges the gap between the last one and the next one.

The sexual stereotyping, primitive political philosophizing, and general lack of action, made it more chore than entertainment.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Imaginative follow up - enjoyed it

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-27-20

Just different enough. Just the right amount of what made the first one fun.

Pay no attention to the complaints. They’re baseless.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Bit like an okay made for tv movie

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-19-16

Would you say that listening to this book was time well-spent? Why or why not?

On the fence.

What was your reaction to the ending? (No spoilers please!)

Meh.

What does D. C. Goode bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?

His use of voice and tone kept the characters separate.

If this book were a movie would you go see it?

No

Any additional comments?

As the author points out, it's best for the 20-something crowd. He tries to shield himself from criticism by suggesting older people won't get it and experts will get angry, and it's fiction that does not represent his thoughts. That's a bit thin.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Well done. Far to short. Really, it's a third of a book.

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 04-24-16

It breaks at a logical point, which could just as easily have been part one.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro805_stickypopup