LISTENER

Critic's Choice

  • 6
  • reviews
  • 22
  • helpful votes
  • 6
  • ratings

Not a realistic courtroom drama

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-28-23

Entertaining enough, but not realistic. The lead character does too many stupid things, even though he clearly knows better. The courtroom proceedings are in too many instances unrealistic. Once a key witness is killed, the defense team, now knowing the truth, could have created a strong defense, but somehow this did not occur to them. The narrator did a nice job, but a good reading cannot elevate a mediocre book to a good one.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Only for Undiscriminating Readers of Legal Fiction

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-11-22

The subject of this book, a doctor who performs unnecessary procedures, is a good one, although hardly novel. However, as a retired lawyer, I find that the supposedly smart plaintiffs' lawyers make stupid mistakes that are simply unbelievable, including regarding so-called "smoking gun" evidence. In a major malpractice case, each side would take the depositions of all material witnesses identified by the other side. This eliminates most surprise testimony. That was apparently not the case here. Also, two characters are stereotypes, which I found offensive. I won't disclose the outcome, but if I did I would point out that there are real world important issues that the author fails to address.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A waste of time

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 11-01-21

The premise of this novel is preposterous, the characters don't match what is known about the people they are supposed to be (shoddy research), and it is impossible to suspend belief given the number of holes in the story. Much of the story is plain silly. Save your credit and time.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Don't waste your time

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 03-07-20

The story is preposterous, the science is way off, the characters are paper thin, and the writing is mediocre.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

15 people found this helpful

Has not aged well

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 09-11-16

What did you like best about From Here to Eternity? What did you like least?

The book was probably considered bold for its time, but the writing distracts from what is otherwise a good story. Throughout the book Jones employs a strange and irritating use of adverbs in describing what the characters say (e.g., "he said pleasedly" and "he said relievedly"). There is also an undertone of antisemitism that, in my opinion, doesn't just reflect the attitudes of the characters. Also, the two key male characters do one stupid, self-destructive thing after another based on their own unique moral standards in the case of Prewitt (like The Fountainhead) or because they just don't give a damn in the case of Warden.

How could the performance have been better?

With one major flaw which I never got used to, the reading was fine. The reader employed an exaggerated, unrealistic accent for the character Maylon Stark.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

5 people found this helpful

a Unique Novel

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-22-15

If you could sum up Damascus Gate in three words, what would they be?

Beautifully written story

What did you like best about this story?

The writing and a story unlike any other

What about George Guidall’s performance did you like?

He always does a good job

Was this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?

No

Any additional comments?

I recommend this book to anyone who loves elegant prose that doesn't call attention to itself (in other words, its not overdone). It also tells a modern-day story that that is intriguing and doesn't remind me of anything else I have ever read. Highly recommended.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful