LISTENER

Corey

  • 18
  • reviews
  • 5
  • helpful votes
  • 30
  • ratings

Wil Wheaton is no George Guidall but he is getting close!

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 12-09-23

The story was short but decent, not my favorite style but this book was gifted to me so I can’t complain about wasting a credit. Wil Wheaton performs the characters exceptionally and allows for an easy visualization of the story.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Makes me feel sorry for Ayn Rand’s “philosophy”

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
1 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-22-23

There is an overwhelming amount of fallacious opinion and a lack critical thought. Rand’s Atlas Shrugged was a masterpiece, when compared to this you realize that Rand is great at fantasy only. Understandably she was influenced by her environment and time period, but with all that was quoted from others she only seemed to be able to regurgitate rather than learn from.

This book is a great example of fallacious philosophical reasoning and I wouldn’t recommend wasting a credit on it. Plato’s Republic would be a more worthwhile lesson in philosophy.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A lot of information…

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 03-28-23

The History of the Medieval World is exactly that, an almost complete history of cultures and kingdom spanning the entire globe. Its a lot to take in but the author does a great job show the connections between each civilization in each time period.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Will always recommend!

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 01-09-23

George Guidall’s narration of this work of philosophical art is a masterpiece itself. This book along with Atlas Shrugged and Plato’s Republic are the three titles I would recommend be at the top of everyone’s “to read” list.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

His logic was very flawed.

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 09-21-22

He starts by arguing for a moral authority, the only assumptions we can make here are that everyone desires happiness, happiness can be obtained by “immoral” means but are immoral means beneficial? It can be seen as beneficial to me now but if deemed wrong by the population it can end up hurting me later. It would be more beneficial to harm none, not necessarily shift to altruism, its still possible to remain selfish and still harm none. This mode of thinking develops morals and needs nothing other than a person with a desire to be happy among others that desire to be happy.

Lewis makes mental gymnastics look like an art, he claims he was an atheist and left it, why? What was the irrefutable evidence that changed a lack of belief to a definitive claim? Shouldn’t the evidence be what this book starts with, rather than fallacious arguments?

He advocates for an all powerful and all knowing god but claims free will,… thats an illusion of free will in a deterministic reality.

Bottomline, I can’t believe that people still use Lewis’s flawed outdated arguments to advocate for a god.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Great information.

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 09-14-22

Tons of evidence analyzed in an unbiased fashion. Great arguments for the lack of a Jesus character, unnecessary though if the God character is necessary for the Jesus argument. Im fairly certain Carrier has addressed this issue before but since the god belief holds a lineage that can be tracked back to much earlier primitive deities, with the complexity growing only has the need arises, gods can be shown to be nothing more than “a failed attempt at scientific methodology” therefore making the supernatural Jesus character by association fictitious.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Good story, great narration

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 05-10-22

As good as it was, I can’t get over the fact that religions are based on stories like this. This story particularly is supposed to take place on Earth near modern Pakistan and these deified characters are basically just having pissing contests that result in the loss of life of millions of humans. I can’t see how that makes something worthy of worship.

Just like the Bible its 100% fictional and many rules and customs are severely outdated/racist/sexist, but an interesting story nonetheless.

The narrator put in some work, there were a few moments where it was almost comical:
One line is “Shudras should serve Kshatriyas”
And it came out as a bunch of “sh” sounds, I laughed but the narrator didn’t skip a beat and just rolled with it.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Mauritania

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 03-15-22

Mauritania is starting to be the best possible location for Atlantis and I believe work needs to be done in this area. But yes from my studies all evidence from cultures across the world show religious stories to be fantastical stories created to explain past events and all correlate to point to a catastrophic event that hinder a great civilization but spread knowledge worldwide.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Didn’t care for it

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-09-22

Ishmael was ok, My Ishmael was odd due to the hyper intelligent 12 year old, Story of B we see a slew of hyper intelligent people making logical fallacy after logical fallacy.

Wouldn’t recommend the entire trilogy, maybe just the first book as an interesting concept.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Wonderful story

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 02-04-22

A philosophical starting point but similarly to Ishmael understanding there is lots of factual information unfortunately these philosophical discussions are riddled with fallacious content. The discussion of good and evil, lawfulness and lawlessness are not only subjective but situational also. One could live their life by seemingly good moral standards but still cause harm in the process. On the subject of “captivity”, the assumption the takers have made themselves captives is also fallacious. With this philosophical dilemma if one embraces the “captive” lifestyle are they still a captive? Are they still a captive if there is nothing or no one actively capturing them?

Great story but begs more questions, perhaps this story never would have been written if Quinn was more familiar with History, Psychology and Philosophy. 5 stars nonetheless for being a book that gets people thinking and interested in these matters.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_webcro768_stickypopup