
Punishment Without Trial
Why Plea Bargaining Is a Bad Deal
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
Buy for $17.19
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Christina Delaine
About this listen
When Americans think of the criminal justice system, the image that comes to mind is a trial-a standard courtroom scene with a defendant, attorneys, a judge, and most important, a jury. It's a fair assumption.
But in Punishment Without Trial: Why Plea Bargaining Is a Bad Deal, University of North Carolina law professor Carissa Byrne Hessick shows that the popular conception of a jury trial couldn't be further from reality. That bedrock constitutional right has all but disappeared thanks to the unstoppable march of plea bargaining, which began to take hold during Prohibition and has skyrocketed since 1971, when it was affirmed as constitutional by the Supreme Court.
Nearly every aspect of our criminal justice system encourages defendants-whether innocent or guilty-to take a plea deal. Punishment Without Trial showcases how plea bargaining has undermined justice at every turn and across socioeconomic and racial divides. It forces the hand of lawyers, judges, and defendants, turning our legal system into a ruthlessly efficient mass incarceration machine that is dogging our jails and punishing citizens. Professor Hessick makes the case against plea bargaining as she illustrates how it has damaged our justice system while presenting an innovative set of reforms for how we can fix it.
©2021 Carissa Byrne Hessick (P)2021 TantorListeners also enjoyed...
-
Punishment Without Crime
- How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal
- By: Alexandra Natapoff
- Narrated by: Janina Edwards
- Length: 9 hrs and 46 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Punishment Without Crime offers an urgent new interpretation of inequality and injustice in America by examining the paradigmatic American offense: the lowly misdemeanor. Based on extensive original research, legal scholar Alexandra Natapoff reveals the inner workings of a massive petty offense system that produces over 13 million cases each year.
-
-
This Book Should Be A Required Read For All
- By Anonymous User on 08-08-19
-
Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
- By: M. Chris Fabricant
- Narrated by: Chris Henry Coffey
- Length: 10 hrs and 50 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
From CSI to Forensic Files to the celebrated reputation of the FBI crime lab, forensic scientists have long been mythologized in American popular culture as infallible crime solvers. Juries put their faith in "expert witnesses", and innocent people have been executed as a result. Innocent people are still on death row today, condemned by junk science.
-
-
Spent a lot of time focusing on race.
- By Kyle P Sumpter on 04-09-25
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- By: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrated by: Daniel Henning
- Length: 7 hrs and 9 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- By Amy Eaton on 03-17-23
-
Presumed Guilty
- How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights
- By: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrated by: Perry Daniels
- Length: 11 hrs and 45 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Presumed Guilty reveals how the Supreme Court allows the perpetuation of racist policing by presuming that suspects, especially people of color, are guilty.
-
-
Required Reading
- By Robert Bragaw on 02-26-23
-
Charged
- The New Movement to Transform American Prosecution and End Mass Incarceration
- By: Emily Bazelon
- Narrated by: Cassandra Campbell
- Length: 13 hrs and 1 min
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Charged follows the story of two young people caught up in the criminal justice system: Kevin, a 20-year-old in Brooklyn who picked up his friend’s gun as the cops burst in and was charged with a serious violent felony, and Noura, a teenage girl in Memphis indicted for the murder of her mother. Bazelon tracks both cases - from arrest and charging to trial and sentencing - and with her trademark blend of deeply reported narrative, legal analysis, and investigative journalism illustrates just how criminal prosecutions can go wrong and, more important, why they don’t have to.
-
-
For any fan of wrongful conviction podcasts
- By L. H. Arnold on 05-13-19
By: Emily Bazelon
-
You Might Go to Prison, Even Though You're Innocent
- By: Justin Brooks
- Narrated by: Justin Brooks
- Length: 7 hrs and 51 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Justin Brooks has spent his career freeing innocent people from prison. With You Might Go to Prison, Even Though You're Innocent, he offers up-close accounts of the cases he has fought, embedding them within a larger landscape of innocence claims and robust research on what we know about the causes of wrongful convictions.
-
-
Required reading
- By San Diego Singer on 06-07-23
By: Justin Brooks
-
Punishment Without Crime
- How Our Massive Misdemeanor System Traps the Innocent and Makes America More Unequal
- By: Alexandra Natapoff
- Narrated by: Janina Edwards
- Length: 9 hrs and 46 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Punishment Without Crime offers an urgent new interpretation of inequality and injustice in America by examining the paradigmatic American offense: the lowly misdemeanor. Based on extensive original research, legal scholar Alexandra Natapoff reveals the inner workings of a massive petty offense system that produces over 13 million cases each year.
-
-
This Book Should Be A Required Read For All
- By Anonymous User on 08-08-19
-
Junk Science and the American Criminal Justice System
- By: M. Chris Fabricant
- Narrated by: Chris Henry Coffey
- Length: 10 hrs and 50 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
From CSI to Forensic Files to the celebrated reputation of the FBI crime lab, forensic scientists have long been mythologized in American popular culture as infallible crime solvers. Juries put their faith in "expert witnesses", and innocent people have been executed as a result. Innocent people are still on death row today, condemned by junk science.
-
-
Spent a lot of time focusing on race.
- By Kyle P Sumpter on 04-09-25
-
Worse than Nothing
- The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism
- By: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrated by: Daniel Henning
- Length: 7 hrs and 9 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Originalism, the view that the meaning of a constitutional provision is fixed when it is adopted, was once the fringe theory of a few extremely conservative legal scholars but is now a well-accepted mode of constitutional interpretation. Noted legal scholar Erwin Chemerinsky gives a comprehensive analysis of the problems that make originalism unworkable as a method of constitutional interpretation. He argues that the framers themselves never intended constitutional interpretation to be inflexible and shows how it is often impossible to know the "original intent" of any provision.
-
-
Impeccably Logical, Backed by 100 Specific Example
- By Amy Eaton on 03-17-23
-
Presumed Guilty
- How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights
- By: Erwin Chemerinsky
- Narrated by: Perry Daniels
- Length: 11 hrs and 45 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Presumed Guilty reveals how the Supreme Court allows the perpetuation of racist policing by presuming that suspects, especially people of color, are guilty.
-
-
Required Reading
- By Robert Bragaw on 02-26-23
-
Charged
- The New Movement to Transform American Prosecution and End Mass Incarceration
- By: Emily Bazelon
- Narrated by: Cassandra Campbell
- Length: 13 hrs and 1 min
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Charged follows the story of two young people caught up in the criminal justice system: Kevin, a 20-year-old in Brooklyn who picked up his friend’s gun as the cops burst in and was charged with a serious violent felony, and Noura, a teenage girl in Memphis indicted for the murder of her mother. Bazelon tracks both cases - from arrest and charging to trial and sentencing - and with her trademark blend of deeply reported narrative, legal analysis, and investigative journalism illustrates just how criminal prosecutions can go wrong and, more important, why they don’t have to.
-
-
For any fan of wrongful conviction podcasts
- By L. H. Arnold on 05-13-19
By: Emily Bazelon
-
You Might Go to Prison, Even Though You're Innocent
- By: Justin Brooks
- Narrated by: Justin Brooks
- Length: 7 hrs and 51 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Justin Brooks has spent his career freeing innocent people from prison. With You Might Go to Prison, Even Though You're Innocent, he offers up-close accounts of the cases he has fought, embedding them within a larger landscape of innocence claims and robust research on what we know about the causes of wrongful convictions.
-
-
Required reading
- By San Diego Singer on 06-07-23
By: Justin Brooks
-
White Rage
- The Unspoken Truth of Our Racial Divide
- By: Carol Anderson
- Narrated by: Pamela Gibson
- Length: 6 hrs and 5 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
As Ferguson, Missouri, erupted in August 2014 and media commentators across the ideological spectrum referred to the angry response of African Americans as 'Black rage', historian Carol Anderson wrote a remarkable op-ed in the Washington Post showing that this was, instead, 'white rage at work. With so much attention on the flames,' she wrote, 'everyone had ignored the kindling.'
-
-
Good History, Was Hoping For More Insight
- By Mike on 09-08-16
By: Carol Anderson
-
Evicted
- Poverty and Profit in the American City
- By: Matthew Desmond
- Narrated by: Dion Graham
- Length: 11 hrs and 3 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In Evicted, Princeton sociologist and MacArthur “Genius” Matthew Desmond follows eight families in Milwaukee as they each struggle to keep a roof over their heads. Hailed as “wrenching and revelatory” (The Nation), “vivid and unsettling” (New York Review of Books), Evicted transforms our understanding of poverty and economic exploitation while providing fresh ideas for solving one of twenty-first-century America’s most devastating problems. Its unforgettable scenes of hope and loss remind us of the centrality of home, without which nothing else is possible.
-
-
Former Property Manager
- By Charla on 05-18-16
By: Matthew Desmond
-
Blind Injustice
- A Former Prosecutor Exposes the Psychology and Politics of Wrongful Convictions
- By: Mark Godsey
- Narrated by: BJ Harrison
- Length: 11 hrs and 46 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Drawing upon stories from his own career, Godsey shares how innate psychological flaws in judges, police, lawyers, and juries coupled with a "tough on crime" environment can cause investigations to go awry, leading to the convictions of innocent people. Godsey explores distinct psychological human weaknesses inherent in the criminal justice system - confirmation bias, memory malleability, cognitive dissonance, bureaucratic denial, dehumanization, and others - and illustrates each with stories from his time as a hard-nosed prosecutor, then as an attorney for the Ohio Innocence Project.
-
-
Spot on
- By Lacey Kinnart on 12-12-19
By: Mark Godsey
-
The Origins of Totalitarianism
- By: Hannah Arendt
- Narrated by: Nadia May
- Length: 23 hrs and 23 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
This classic, definitive account of totalitarianism traces the emergence of modern racism as an "ideological weapon for imperialism", beginning with the rise of anti-Semitism in Europe in the 19th century and continuing through the New Imperialism period from 1884 to World War I.
-
-
Vast and intricate analysis of horror
- By Roger on 08-04-08
By: Hannah Arendt
-
Fixer-Upper
- How to Repair America’s Broken Housing Systems
- By: Jenny Schuetz
- Narrated by: Suzie Althens
- Length: 5 hrs and 46 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Much ink has been spilled in recent years talking about political divides and inequality in the United States. But these discussions too often miss one of the most important factors in the divisions among Americans: the fundamentally unequal nature of the nation's housing systems. Increasingly, important life outcomes—performance in school, employment, even life expectancy—are determined by where people live and the quality of homes they live in. Fixer-Upper is the first book assessing how local, state, and national housing policies affect people and communities.
-
-
Good review
- By A. F. Davis on 09-16-22
By: Jenny Schuetz
-
Against the Grain
- A Deep History of the Earliest States
- By: James C. Scott
- Narrated by: Eric Jason Martin
- Length: 8 hrs and 35 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Why did humans abandon hunting and gathering for sedentary communities dependent on livestock and cereal grains and governed by precursors of today's states? Most people believe that plant and animal domestication allowed humans, finally, to settle down and form agricultural villages, towns, and states, which made possible civilization, law, public order, and a presumably secure way of living. But archaeological and historical evidence challenges this narrative.
-
-
World without Women
- By Paul Richards on 04-28-18
By: James C. Scott
-
Shielded
- How the Police Became Untouchable
- By: Joanna Schwartz
- Narrated by: Joanna Schwartz
- Length: 9 hrs and 8 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In recent years, the high-profile murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and so many others have brought much-needed attention to the pervasiveness of police misconduct. Yet it remains nearly impossible to hold police accountable for abuses of power—the decisions of the Supreme Court, state and local governments, and policy makers have, over decades, made the police all but untouchable. In Shielded, University of California, Los Angeles, law professor Joanna Schwartz exposes the myriad ways in which our legal system protects police at all costs.
-
-
essential reading for engaged citizens
- By SLD on 02-24-23
By: Joanna Schwartz
-
What It Took to Win
- A History of the Democratic Party
- By: Michael Kazin
- Narrated by: Lee Goettl
- Length: 13 hrs and 41 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In What It Took to Win, the eminent historian Michael Kazin identifies and assesses the Democratic Party's long-running commitment to creating "moral capitalism" - a system that mixed entrepreneurial freedom with the welfare of workers and consumers. And yet the same party that championed the rights of the white working man also vigorously protected or advanced the causes of slavery, segregation, and Indian removal.
-
-
Timely and informative History Book
- By Asha Sceanca on 03-24-22
By: Michael Kazin
-
Criminal Procedure
- Developed for Law School Exams and the Multistate Bar
- By: AudioOutlines
- Narrated by: Rafi Nemes JD
- Length: 3 hrs and 18 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
In Criminal Procedure, we explore the fundamental black-letter rules of criminal procedure most commonly tested on the MBE and in law school. By combining a simplified approach to legal learning with the innovative and on-the-go appeal of an audio study aid, Criminal Procedure provides you with a concise overview of the subject matter in a manner that truly makes it easy to review and memorize. Criminal Procedure also includes numerous hypothetical examples and analyses to help you apply legal reasoning in analyzing fact patterns.
-
-
Just one thing
- By Mariah Fleming on 05-14-19
By: AudioOutlines
-
Poverty, by America
- By: Matthew Desmond
- Narrated by: Dion Graham
- Length: 5 hrs and 40 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
The United States, the richest country on earth, has more poverty than any other advanced democracy. Why? Why does this land of plenty allow one in every eight of its children to go without basic necessities, permit scores of its citizens to live and die on the streets, and authorize its corporations to pay poverty wages?
-
-
A testimonial based on facts and witness
- By Alonzo Nightjar on 03-27-23
By: Matthew Desmond
-
The Economic Weapon
- The Rise of Sanctions as a Tool of Modern War
- By: Nicholas Mulder
- Narrated by: Liam Gerrard
- Length: 12 hrs and 25 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Economic sanctions dominate the landscape of world politics today. First developed in the early twentieth century as a way of exploiting the flows of globalization to defend liberal internationalism, their appeal is that they function as an alternative to war. This view, however, ignores the dark paradox at their core: designed to prevent war, economic sanctions are modeled on devastating techniques of warfare.
-
-
History of sanctions during the early 20th century
- By Mehdi Mollahasani on 03-05-22
By: Nicholas Mulder
-
Waiting for an Echo
- The Madness of American Incarceration
- By: Christine Montross
- Narrated by: Christine Montross
- Length: 10 hrs and 8 mins
- Unabridged
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Dr. Christine Montross has spent her career treating the most severely ill psychiatric patients. Several years ago, she set out to investigate why so many of her patients got caught up in the legal system when discharged from her care - and what happened to them therein. Waiting for an Echo is a riveting, rarely seen glimpse into American incarceration. It is also a damning account of policies that have criminalized mental illness, shifting large numbers of people who belong in therapeutic settings into punitive ones.
-
-
life changing
- By Diana Kiesel on 08-05-20
What listeners say about Punishment Without Trial
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- jassen woodall
- 10-28-24
very interesting and informative
loaded with information and things I never knew i didn't know. it got me thinking differently about the cash bail system something I didn't except. it actually gave me an entirely different prospect on the criminal and civil law system than I had going into this book.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
Near perfect look at a broken even corrupt system!
This book and it's subject matter are critically important to understanding the major cause of mass incarceration in the US today. Prosecutor's have unchecked power to act without consequence as judge jury and executioner in over 97% of cases that pass through our criminal courts today and have a developed a culture of "win at all costs" within their offices and chains of command. The 97% is the number of criminal cases in this country that are settled WITHOUT a trial! The court system does not give most defendants a fighting chance and only 2-3 people out of every hundred have the guts to challenge the system though they are often treated as if they are mentally unstable when they do because it has become "crazy" to challenge the wheels of justice and everybody involved assumes those wheel are going roll right over you. What's sad is they are right to h have that opinion because it's based on facts. They way the system has evolved over time as is detailed in this book literally has gone in the opposite direction of it's original intent to find out the truth and dispense justice accordingly. We are not at a point where at nearly every turn citizens are being forced to sign away constitutional rights, get bullied into pleading guilty often without seeing the evidence against them or being able to consult with an attorney and then on top of all of it, lie to the court and say no threats or promises were made to get them to agree to the appeal or the court will not accept it! This happens all day every day in courts in every single state in the country and all of the parties (often accept the defendants) are fully aware of the grand deception taking place. When defendants want to exercise their right to a trial they are flat out told they will get a much more severe sentence if they exercise that right (on average 2-3 times as long as if they did not have a trial) which is absurd as this book points out! Would we punish someone for exercising any other rights? Would we routinely demand citizens sign away these rights as part of a strategy to fight for their very lives? This book as well as a few of the others i have reviewed recently will provide the kind of information every American needs to have in order to understand what our own government is acting out as our public servants! These people are supposed to be there to work for us and keep the public safe but it doesn't seem that is what their jobs are about anymore. Check out the book and decide for yourselves. It's time to wake up people!!
If I was going to make any criticism of this book it would be that there hasn't been anyone. including the author who has explored the consequences of so called "pre-trial monitoring" and how reporting to these programs is often a requirement of bail/bond and can often be more stringent and intrusive than even probation and parole. though you are still technically innocent you must report as much as 1-2 times per week during business hours which means time off of work, you are subjected to monitoring by agencies I have nicknamed "The Peelice" (because their primary function is pee testing you) for constant UA drug tests which I have personally found humiliating. The procedure in Milwaukee county requires you to pull your pants to your knees, pull your shit up to your breasts then spin in a complete circle and then hold one hand up as you take the cup with the other and then try to urinate. If that is not enough then imagine adding to that a worker who feels she needs to squat down about 3 feet in from of you and stare at your genitals as you try to go! If you refuse or can't go it is considered a failure of a UA and for any failed tests (as well as a variety of other violations of the programs rules) you are immediately dragged before your judge who must now squeeze you into an already overflowing schedule to explain yourself and your "bail jumping" to them. You cannot predict what is going to happen. Could be jail. could be a demand for more bail. could be some other punishment ordered or it could be nothing. That's just it is that you never know so you feel as though your life is hanging on by a thread every time you have to report to these people. It makes many people take plea deals in the same way being in jail pretrial does. It is often used by prosecutors as a tool to press for a plea deal because they know people with certain mental health or addiction issues of those who live in certain areas where stop and frisks are used regularly that there is good chance someone with these circumstances will make a mistake and they can then threaten felony bail jumping charges get added on which they can easily get a conviction on if the defendant even the innocent do not agree to the plea they are being offered. It's a common everyday occurrence. These pretrial monitoring programs often treat the innocent worse than a PO does someone who has plead guilty, They shouldn't be allowed to demand so much from people who have to be presumed innocent! Check stubs, bank statements, medical information including any and all RX medication to name a few things all becomes part of your criminal case information! YOUR ONLY ALTERNATIVE IS JAIL! you cannot refuse these programs if you want to get out. So I would like the author or future authors to please investigate pretrial monitoring because as I have pointed out here it's a serious part of the problem!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
1 person found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Anonymous User
- 02-08-25
Good Introduction
This book does an excellent job of explaining why plea bargaining has become so pervasive and why it is so pernicious - however, for practitioners in the criminal legal system, many of those reasons will already be clear. I also found the solutions section to leave me wanting a little more, with some of the explanations for why the author believes these reforms would help feeling like they could have used a more detailed explanation. If you’re interested in the problem of plea bargaining and don’t have professional experience with it, this is the book for you.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- RT
- 05-25-22
A must read
This book outlines both the problems and best solutions to fixing our justice system. Implementing sone of these solutions will give our country the freedom and equality our country has always promised.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- MJW
- 12-29-21
Important to know about our justice system
A well researched look at crime and punishment and the distortions caused by plea bargaining in the United States. Well narrated. Important information we should know as informed citizens.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Angela Landa
- 04-24-22
Exactly what to expect from a non-practicing academic
I was assigned to read this for a class and really TRIED to go into it with an open mind, but she started out with a story about how unreasonable to her it seemed that a defendant would plead guilty and serve 10 years for a murder he didn’t do. I interned at an innocence project and a simple Google search of their work would show that this is a reality. She ends the book talking about this same defendant and that she went to go ask him if he regretted it- fully expecting him to say yes. He did not and she asked him 3 times because she wanted the perfect quote to encapsulate her book. One of these times being after he told her that he didn’t want to dwell on the past and had come to peace with it. This cruel disregard for the realities of those brought into the criminal legal system is what you can expect from this book.
To be fair, there were several ideas that I thought were good suggestions. Bail reform and the two prosecutors she discussed towards the end of the chapter prior to the conclusion. However, the author simply could not fathom/adjust her hypothesis: trials is the constitutional right guaranteed and trials disrupt that. Even though she was unable to explain how a trial guarantees more Justice when we take into account jury biases, underfunded public defenders representing, unfair judges, etc. She recognized the ideas by progressive prosecutors dismissing and presenting fair pleas as the best idea, but just could not actually adjust the narrative in the end.
Lastly, just like not good writing in general. Her writing makes me believe she came into this with stories she wanted to share and was never able to actually figure out how they fit/affected the system so she just threw them in anyways. Example being the girl that got a deferred sentence but no one (the author included because she didn’t know what it is and didn’t. Take time to find out for defendant) explained what that meant to the defendant and it was a very good outcome but if the defendant violated the deferred sentencing she would be sentenced. I fully expected a story where the girl was negatively impacted by getting a deferred sentence but the author just shared the story…. Just because? No actual pros or cons attached to her personal narrative.
If you want to know best about what punishment without trial defendants in our country have, read The New Jim Crow, follow a public defender on Twitter, or just talk to someone that agreed to an unfair plea they took- all are more credible than this book.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!