• 21. Metafore e mente incarnata

  • Nov 16 2024
  • Length: 31 mins
  • Podcast

21. Metafore e mente incarnata

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • In questa puntata, esploriamo come le metafore non siano solo un elemento della lingua letteraria, ma abbiano un ruolo fondamentale nella nostra comprensione del mondo. A partire dal libro Metaphors We Live By di G. Lakoff e M. Johnson, analizziamo il potere delle metafore e come la linguistica cognitiva consideri il linguaggio parte dei processi mentali e corporei. Grazie agli esempi di metafore quotidiane, gli autori mostrano come la mente usi metafore concettuali per dare senso a concetti complessi, rivelando il legame profondo tra linguaggio ed esperienza fisica.

    Grafiche: Gianluca La Bruna

    La sigla è stata prodotta da White Hot e fornita da https://freebeats.io

    Fonti:
    • Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B. (2008). Metaphor as structure-mapping. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 109–128). Cambridge University Press.
    • Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.
    • Gibbs, R. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48:529-562.
    • Gibbs, R. (2013). The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor. Language Sciences, 40:45–52.
    • Harris, R.A. (1993). The Linguistics Wars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Kertesz, A., Rakosi, C., & Csatar, P. (2012). Data, problems, heuristics and results in cognitive metaphor research. Language Sciences, 24:715-727.
    • Lacey, S., Stilla, R., & Sathian, K. (2012). Metaphorically feeling: Comprehending textural metaphors activates somatosensory cortex. Brain and Language, 120(3):416-421.
    • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    • Núñez, R.E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the Future Behind Them: Convergent Evidence From Aymara Language and Gesture in the Crosslinguistic Comparison of Spatial Construals of Time. Cognitive Science 30(3): 401–450.
    • Proulx, P. (1987). Quechua and Aymara. Language Sciences 9(1):91-102.
    • Richards, A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    • Rovelli, C. (2012). Il tempo non esiste. Carlo Rovelli at TEDx Lake Como
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeHHjGKwZWM&ab_channel=TEDxTalks
    • Tovey, M. (2023). Spatial Metaphors as Linguistic Primitives: A Comparison of UP-DOWN Metaphors in Three Languages. The University of Western Ontario Journal of Anthropology, 25(1):152–159.
    Show more Show less
Show more Show less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about 21. Metafore e mente incarnata

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.com reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available