In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership , Tom Collins is joined by Dr. Denny Lund, former Chief Medical Officer of Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford and a seasoned pediatric surgeon. They delve into the crucial role of competence in leadership, especially in high-stakes environments where lives, careers, or missions are on the line.

Dr. Lund defines competence as having diverse experience and knowledge pertinent to running an orgaization, emphasizing the necessity of being a lifelong learner. The conversation highlights a common challenge: individuals often rise to leadership positions based on technical competence but lack the necessary leadership competence. Dr. Lund asserts that leadership is a learned behavior, not an intrinsic quality, and requires intentional pursuit of training and learning. He shares his own journey of seeking formal and informal leadership education while balancing a demanding medical career and family life.

Key takeaways from their discussion include:

• The Importance of Reading: Dr. Lund recommends Leadership by James MacGregor Burns and Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman as foundational texts for aspiring leaders.
• Understanding Your Impact: Effective leaders must understand the effect they have on others, a concept central to emotional intelligence.
• Managing High Stakes: The discussion covers how competence is vital in various "high-stakes" situations, not just life-or-death scenarios, from critical team conversations to championship moments.
• Leading by Empowerment: Dr. Lund emphasizes valuing team members and empowering rising leaders, allowing them to confidently perform their roles. He recounts a personal experience of stepping into a CEO role unexpectedly, relying on his learned leadership principles and trusted advisors.
• Avoiding Overconfidence: Both Dr. Lund and Tom Collins warn against the dangers of overconfidence, especially among highly trained professionals, and stress the importance of seeking wise counsel and continually re-evaluating skills. This ties into the Dunning-Kruger effect, where low-competence individuals overestimate their abilities and high-competence individuals underestimate theirs.
• Actionable Steps for Competence: The episode concludes with practical advice for leaders to improve competence, including reading, observing effective leaders, deliberate practice under pressure, developing decision-making frameworks (like the pre-mortem), and maintaining humility and self-awareness. The power of coaching and mentorship is also underscored.

Key References:

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper and Row.

Collins, R. T., Purington, N. & Roth, S. J. (2022). Physician understanding of and beliefs about leadership. Journal of Healthcare Management, 67(2), 120–136.

Connelly, M. S., Gilbert, J. A., Zaccaro, S. J., Threlfall, K. V., Marks, M. A. & Mumford, M. D. (2000). Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00043-0

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bantam Books.

Grant, A. (2021). Think again: The power of knowing what you don’t know. Viking.

Kozminski, A. K., Baczyńska, A. K., Skoczeń, I. & Korzynski, P. (2022). Towards leadership effectiveness: the role of leadership individual competencies and constraints. Introduction of the Bounded Leadership Model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(4), 596–611. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-04-2020-0157

Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121

Wisittigars, B. & Siengthai, S. (2019). Crisis leadership competencies: the facility management sector in Thailand. Facilities, 37(13/14), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1108/f-10-2017-0100

To learn more about the Science of Leadership, visit https://www.fourstarleaders.com/

In this episode of @TheScienceofLeadership , Tom Collins welcomes Dr. Kate Smith, Senior Associate Dean of Biology Education and Professor of Medical Science at Brown University, to delve into the powerful concept of Radical Candor.

Dr. Smith explains that Radical Candor, as defined by Kim Scott, is about "how to say what you mean without being mean". It requires both caring personally and challenging directly. The conversation explores the pitfalls of leadership communication when Radical Candor is absent, identifying three common traps:

🔸Obnoxious Aggression: Challenging directly without personal care, leading to feelings of attack and disregarded criticism.

🔸Manipulative Insincerity: Offering insincere praise or talking negatively behind someone's back, which creates toxic workplaces.

🔸Ruinous Empathy: Protecting short-term feelings by avoiding direct feedback, often leading to regrettable mistakes and unaddressed poor performance.

Dr. Smith shares a personal anecdote demonstrating the immediate and positive impact of Radical Candor, highlighting its real-time, direct, and empathetic nature. They discuss how setting clear expectations for communication within a team fosters a culture where feedback is received more effectively.

The episode also touches upon the scientific backing for Radical Candor's components, such as transparency fostering psychological safety and collaboration , and empathy leading to higher job satisfaction, innovation, and performance. Dr. Smith emphasizes that Radical Candor isn't just for criticism; it's equally vital for delivering genuine, in-the-moment praise.

Ultimately, the discussion underscores that practicing Radical Candor builds trust, deepens connections, and increases efficiency, contributing not only to better leadership but to a better life overall. Tom and Dr. Smith even introduce the complementary concept of "Radical Curiosity" as a way for leaders to gain deeper understanding before offering feedback.

To learn more about the science of leadership, visit https://www.fourstarleaders.com/

Note: Dr. Smith inadvertently referred to Kim Scott, the author of Radical Candor, as "Kristen Scott" several times during the podcast. She recognized her mistake later and is sorry for that.

References

Bennis, W., Goleman, D. & O’Toole, J. (2008). Transparency: How Leaders Create a Culture of Candor. Jossey-Bass.

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth. John Wiley & Sons.

Kock, N., Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., Sexton, S. & Garza, L. M. D. L. (2019). Empathetic Leadership: How Leader Emotional Support and Understanding Influences Follower Performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818806290

Scott, K. (2015). Radical Candor: How to Be a Kick-Ass Boss Without Losing Your Humanity. St. Martin’s Press.

Vich, M. & Kim, M. Y. (2016). Construction and Application of Radical Candor: Efficiency of Criticism at Work. Central European Business Review, 5(4), 11–22.

In this episode of The Science of Leadership, host Tom Collins welcomes Matt Abrahams, a strategic communication lecturer at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business, author, and host of the Think Fast, Talk Smart podcast. They dive deep into the concept of strategic communication, which Matt defines as the application of clear goals and purpose to our communication, whether handling a crisis or propagating a message throughout an organization.

Key ideas discussed include:

• Communication as Operationalized Leadership: Matt shares that communication is "operationalized leadership," meaning leaders lead through how they communicate.
• The Biggest Mistake in Strategic Communication: A critical mistake leaders often make is not involving communication early enough in their processes, viewing it as an afterthought rather than an integral part of problem-solving or opportunity seizing.
• Audience-Centric Communication: Effective communication is not about what you say, but "what they hear". It's crucial to understand your audience's position, orientation, and values, then tailor your message to ensure they receive the intended meaning.
• Improving Communication Skills: Matt provides practical tips for enhancing strategic communication, emphasizing three essential methods for improvement: repetition, reflection, and feedback.
• The "Must-Have" of Strategic Communication: Beyond understanding your audience, the second most important aspect is having a clear, goal-directed message. A clear goal has three parts:
  • What you want the audience to know (information).
  • How you want them to feel (emotion).
  • What you want them to do (action).
• The Value of Communication Training: Investing in formal communication training is vital for leadership success, a practice exemplified by top military leaders.

To learn more about Matt Abrahams' work, visit his website at https://www.fastersmarter.io/ and check out his podcast, Think Fast, Talk Smart. You can also connect with him on LinkedIn.

If you want to learn more about The Science of Leadership, visit https://www.fourstarleaders.com/

References

Abrahams, M. (2016). Speaking Up Without Freaking Out: 50 Techniques for Confident and Compelling Presenting, 3rd ed. Kendall Hunt Publishing.

Abrahams, M. (2023). Think Faster, Talk Smarter: How to Speak Successfully When You’re Put on the Spot. Simon Element.