
Scalia Dissents
Writings of the Supreme Court's Wittiest, Most Outspoken Justice
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $23.94
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Wyntner Woody
-
By:
-
Antonin Scalia
Brilliant. Colorful. Visionary. Tenacious. Witty.
Since his appointment to the Supreme Court in 1986, Associate Justice Antonin Scalia has been described as all of these things, and for good reason. He is perhaps the best-known justice on the Supreme Court today and certainly the most controversial. Yet most Americans have probably not read even one of his several hundred Supreme Court opinions.
Collecting the writing of the Supreme Court's most outspoken and controversial justice, the author here presents speeches, rulings, and opinions that reveal Scalia's wit and intelligence, both on the bench and off.
©2004 Kevin A. Ring (P)2012 Regnery PublishingListeners also enjoyed...




















People who viewed this also viewed...




what a genius
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
a must listen for all
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Wonderful dissents.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Interesting insight into Justice Scalia
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Commentary is OK, real jewel is Scalia's opinions
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Would you try another book from Antonin Scalia and/or Wyntner Woody?
probably notWhat was one of the most memorable moments of Scalia Dissents?
the revelations of how he arrived at his desents. I understand the rationale that he used to arrive at his decisions, however I sense a underlying 'justification' based in his own political leanings that he decries so mightily within his benchmates.Have you listened to any of Wyntner Woody’s other performances before? How does this one compare?
noIf this book were a movie would you go see it?
noAny additional comments?
I am not a lawyer nor am I a fan of the subject, Scalia however, I found the insight gained into this judge's view point will allow me a more enlightened attitude as I follow the decisions of this court.interesting
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
What made the experience of listening to Scalia Dissents the most enjoyable?
The expository about how decisions are made to decide landmark cases and the refutation of all his critics.What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?
The scholarly and consistent approachIf you could give Scalia Dissents a new subtitle, what would it be?
"and deftly addresses his critics"Any additional comments?
Great listen.Excellent, well presented book
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I'm as left wing as it's possible to be, and I read this book to understand the intellectual position of the people who I'm arguing against on the grounds that there are few people who I disagree with more firmly than Justice Scalia, and for that purpose this book is excellent. Hard to get through in places where there's editorializing, but faithful renderings of his SC dissensions.
weird and full of hubris and complicated
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Interesting logic
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Scalia did not write this book although he is listed as the author. The book discussed his early years and quotes very extensively from his dissenting opinions on important cases. The book does not quote from any of his majority opinions. Scalia's style, wit, and rhetoric is on full display in this book.
The great value of the book is in explaining the Scalia method of constitutional and law interpretation. He called it "textualism". Textualism is different from originalism and conservatism. Scalia's method was rational and consistent; that statement cannot be made about any other recent Supreme Court Justice, not even Thomas or Alito (the two who come closest).
The US Constitution did not intend for the Supreme Court to become political, yet most of the current members vote their political beliefs rather than interpret the Constitution. Maybe the time has come to change the Constitution to make Supreme Court members answerable to voters serving 12 or 18 year terms rather than be appointed for life. The current system is not working and the death of Antonin Scalia means it will work less well in the future.
Justice Antonin Scalia died yesterday
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.