A Matter of Interpretation Audiobook By Antonin Scalia, Amy Gutmann - editor foreword cover art

A Matter of Interpretation

Federal Courts and the Law

Preview

Try for $0.00
Access a growing selection of included Audible Originals, audiobooks, and podcasts.
You will get an email reminder before your trial ends.
Audible Plus auto-renews for $7.95/mo after 30 days. Upgrade or cancel anytime.

A Matter of Interpretation

By: Antonin Scalia, Amy Gutmann - editor foreword
Narrated by: Christopher Grove
Try for $0.00

$7.95 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $17.19

Buy for $17.19

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel

About this listen

We are all familiar with the image of the immensely clever judge who discerns the best rule of common law for the case at hand. According to US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a judge like this can maneuver through earlier cases to achieve the desired aim - "[D]istinguishing one prior case on his left, straight-arming another one on his right, high-stepping away from another precedent about to tackle him from the rear, until (bravo!) he reaches the goal - good law." But is this common-law mindset, which is appropriate in its place, suitable also in statutory and constitutional interpretation? In a witty and trenchant essay, Justice Scalia answers this question with a resounding negative.

This essay is followed by four commentaries by Professors Gordon Wood, Laurence Tribe, Mary Ann Glendon, and Ronald Dworkin, who engage Justice Scalia's ideas about judicial interpretation from varying standpoints. In the spirit of debate, Justice Scalia responds to these critics.

Featuring a new foreword that discusses Scalia's impact, jurisprudence, and legacy, this witty and trenchant exchange illuminates the brilliance of one of the most influential legal minds of our time.

©1997, 2018 Princeton University Press (P)2020 Tantor
Judicial Systems Political Science Witty English Law
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about A Matter of Interpretation

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    30
  • 4 Stars
    8
  • 3 Stars
    5
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    2
Performance
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    26
  • 4 Stars
    6
  • 3 Stars
    2
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    1
Story
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    26
  • 4 Stars
    7
  • 3 Stars
    0
  • 2 Stars
    1
  • 1 Stars
    1

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

In Depth

This book was of a more scholarly nature then all of the hundreds of recordings I have listened to in the past. That is not to complain, but to warn the prospective listeners it requires much more effort to listen.

Its content is not only an erudite topic for one of our most well know justices, but also quite germane in today’s politically-charged atmosphere surrounding the debate of Constitutional originalist interpretation (where Scalia was entrenched) and the non-originalists, so-called “living” proponents.

The author did a remarkable job of gathering sufficient remarks (essays) of contrast to Scalia’s body of work, although I felt it tilted the scales to the liberal side too much.

One other thing it took me a moment to understand is the author’s use of Democratic vs democratic. The first time he referred to Scalia as a democratic judge, it took me a moment to realize he was using the lowercase “d”!

I will be reading it again to listen to all the arguments and their details.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Edifying Layout of Prevailing Interpretive Theory

As a simple voting citizen this book helped me to see a, little more clearly, the conflicts in governmental philosophy as implemented through judicial action.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Deeper and denser but understandable

The subject matter of the book was deeper and denser than my capabilities but that’s not on the book, the author or the commentators but on my own ignorance. Still I was able to come out with a better understanding of the philosophy and views on the US constitution and its interpretation.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    2 out of 5 stars

Waste

Do not waste your time. Argument on the left is pathetic. One argues that Scalia should read the constitution to the end!!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!