Strangers on a Train Audiobook By Patricia Highsmith cover art

Strangers on a Train

Preview

Try for $0.00
Prime logo Prime members: New to Audible?
Get 2 free audiobooks during trial.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Strangers on a Train

By: Patricia Highsmith
Narrated by: Bronson Pinchot
Try for $0.00

$14.95/month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $15.56

Buy for $15.56

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel

About this listen

In Patricia Highsmith's debut novel, we encounter Guy Haines and Charles Anthony Bruno, passengers on the same train. But while Guy is a successful architect in the midst of a divorce, Bruno turns out to be a sadistic psychopath who manipulates Guy into swapping murders with him. As Bruno carries out his twisted plan, Guy is trapped in Highsmith's perilous world - where, under the right circumstances, anybody is capable of murder.

The inspiration for Alfred Hitchcock's classic 1951 film, Strangers on a Train launched Highsmith on a prolific career of noir fiction and proved her mastery of depicting the unsettling forces that tremble beneath the surface of everyday contemporary life.

©2015 Patricia Highsmith (P)2015 Blackstone Audio, Inc.
Crime Fiction Crime Thrillers Fiction Mystery Noir Psychological Suspense Thriller Thriller & Suspense Transportation Scary

Featured Article: These Noir Listens Will Take You to the Dark Side of Fiction


What do you love most in your mystery listens? Is it dark, moody settings and gritty storylines? Is it morally ambiguous main characters with complex inner lives? If so, noir is your kind of fiction. As a literary genre, noir can be difficult to nail down because so much of it is based on a general feeling of darkness and danger. Noir fiction was inspired by film noir, and film noir traces its roots to hard-boiled detective novels. Check out the world of noir fiction audiobooks.

What listeners say about Strangers on a Train

Highly rated for:

Gripping Storyline Intense Psychological Drama Excellent Narration Compelling Premise Suspenseful Plot
Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    973
  • 4 Stars
    730
  • 3 Stars
    394
  • 2 Stars
    124
  • 1 Stars
    55
Performance
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    1,269
  • 4 Stars
    516
  • 3 Stars
    206
  • 2 Stars
    49
  • 1 Stars
    27
Story
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    891
  • 4 Stars
    611
  • 3 Stars
    383
  • 2 Stars
    116
  • 1 Stars
    63

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

A Hardboiled Novel of Manners

Any additional comments?

If the term doesn’t already exist, I want to coin this a ‘hardboiled novel of manners’. There’s a genteel novel-of-manners feel to it as we get a lot of attention on the niceties of how properly to entertain someone, how architecture or fashion functions as social statement, and how people generally express themselves through subtle public gestures.

Highsmith’s central insight seems to be that civilization (or what she has her characters call “society” when it comes to the fore in the final pages) is a thin veneer on top of a species with the capacity to be real animals. Bruno says as much in the opening scene when he declares that every man is capable of murder, and that’s borne out. Everyone (except the saintly Anne) is indeed capable of murder. We need laws to keep us from going wild, but it isn’t clear society truly wants that. Most of the characters seem happy to tolerate murder as long as it doesn’t affect them. It just seems understood that people do bad things.

Highsmith uses that hardboiled axiom to explore the famous premise of the novel: two men meet on a train and toy with the idea of having each commit a murder on the other’s behalf. Without motives, each murderer would go unsuspected, yet each would accomplish his goal.

In Hitchcock’s hands, that story became a chance for him to explore his own favored notion of a protagonist who, somehow a little guilty or compromised (whether for listening to a murderous stranger on a train or simply peeping into a neighbor’s window) finds himself a fundamentally innocent man bound up with truly despicable people. Highsmith’s vision is much darker. [SPOILER] Most tellingly, Guy actually goes on to commit the murder that Bruno wants from him. Hitchcock gives his protagonist an out; he eventually pulls himself back from the “deal” he’s entered into. Highsmith’s protagonist gets broken down, however. Under the pressure of Bruno’s obsession, he proceeds to kill Bruno’s father. Later, he begins to echo many of the more Bruno’s more despicable quirks. At the end he determines that anyone can be broken down, that we’re all so fundamentally vicious that the right pressure can turn us all into characters.

There’s a crispness throughout most of this, but I think it falls a bit short in some of its psychological profiling. In the end, I simply don’t find Guy’s breakdown authentic. Compromised as he might be, I don’t accept why he doesn’t go to the police, especially when he has such compelling evidence of Bruno’s guilt. Highsmith writes compellingly, but I think this falls a bit short of the even darker, more efficient Talented Mr. Ripley.

As a final thought, I wondered whether this might in some way be a comment on the then only 6-7 years old Fountainhead. We have here a protagonist who realizes, eventually, that individuals stand apart from a rule-bound society. He feels called to do great things, and he concludes that simple things, like other people’s lives, shouldn’t hold him back.

I have not read The Fountainhead, but is there’s anything to my hunch, this is not a flattering comment. The novel ultimately does not endorse such a vision of the power of the great ego. Rather, we come to find Guy a somewhat small man, a man whose being broken down by another has undermined the real gifts he had. In fact, as I read it, this undermines Ayn Rand altogether. Skeptical as this is of what holds society together, it laments our alone-ness rather than celebrates it.

Highsmith remains the first acknowledged female star of the hardboiled tradition. If all you know of this one is the film, you’re in for a surprise.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

7 people found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Amazing!!!

So good! Can you top Hitchcock? YES!!! ... Also, bravo to Cousin Balki for an epic rendition!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Best ever

Bronson Princhot makes this masterpiece novel a most wonderful listen. Can't wait listen to him again soon.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

I've always loved this classic

I went through a phase in high school in which I devoured Patricia Highsmith. Strangers on a Train was my first Highsmith and favorite, and over a decade later it's still the case. For me it's completely engaging, and I'm engrossed in the psychological tension between the characters the whole time. I find that her characters aren't likeable, but they're so human that I can't quite dislike them either. There is something eerie and relatable in her dark stories that captivates me. Strangers on a Train is the perfect example.

The narration was good and I thought captured the characters quite well. Another reviewer commented on homophobia in the novel - - I just wanted to quickly clarify that Patricia Highsmith herself is one of the great queer authors of mid-century America. She included a lot of homo-erotic undertones in her work through her own unique lens.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Fantastic

One the best books I've read in the past year. Great pacing and fascinating character portraits.
Very well read too. Great job on the audio.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Unsettling

A well crafted and deeply disturbing book which I almost stopped listening to several times I found the content so dark and filled with despair.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Wonderfully fiendish

I love the characters in Patricia Highsmiths' novels. She really goes inside their minds and lets the reader in on sone twisted and often funny thinking. I was hesitant to try something out of the Mr. Ripley series but I am glad that I did! Bronson Pinchot does a very good and entertaining narration.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    4 out of 5 stars

Mixed Feelings

Although the book was written in the 1950s, it definitely fits the modern noir genre. It had some suspenseful moments, but it did drag in several places.

I did find most all of the characters annoying to some degree but in varying ways. Guy's thoughts and actions were often illogical. At first, I considered him naive, but later changed my opinion to illogical and erratic. Bruno is clearly a sociopath with homosexual tendencies. It was harder to discern if Guy had a latent homosexual attraction to Bruno. If Guy didn't, it is hard to figure out why he kept letting him come around. There was a lame explanation that Bruno wore him down and reduced some of his guilt, but that didn't really make sense to me. Anne's interactions with Bruno were also strange and not believable. One minute she detests him then she invites him to be with them.

As others have noted, the ending is abrupt, but I think it worked fine for this story. The Talented Mr. Ripley was more enjoyable and better written but this was one of her first books. Overall, I would probably say this was 3.5 stars but rounded up because the plot was interesting especially since it was written over 70 years ago.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Good entertainment!

The story is smart and imaginative, but the real jewel is Bronson Pinchot's reading of it. He renders perfectly every accent, age, gender and the internal character of each person in the story. He makes even the narrator someone we feel we know. He is excellent!

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

  • Overall
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

Narration is the best part of the book

The storyline is interesting, but Bronson Pinchot's narration kept me listening. It was better than the movie.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!