A First-Rate Madness Audiobook By S. Nassir Ghaemi cover art

A First-Rate Madness

Uncovering the Links Between Leadership and Mental Illness

 Preview
LIMITED TIME OFFER

3 months free
Try for $0.00
Offer ends July 31, 2025 at 11:59PM PT.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 3 months. Cancel anytime.

A First-Rate Madness

By: S. Nassir Ghaemi
Narrated by: Adam Barr
Try for $0.00

$0.00/mo. after 3 months. Offer ends July 31, 2025 at 11:59PM PT. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $18.00

Buy for $18.00

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
Switch payment method
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use, License, and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel

The New York Times bestseller

“A glistening psychological history, faceted largely by the biographies of eight famous leaders . . .”—The Boston Globe

“A provocative thesis . . . Ghaemi’s book deserves high marks for original thinking.”—The Washington Post

“Provocative, fascinating.”—Salon.com

Historians have long puzzled over the apparent mental instability of great and terrible leaders alike: Napoleon, Lincoln, Churchill, Hitler, and others. In A First-Rate Madness, Nassir Ghaemi, director of the Mood Disorders Program at Tufts Medical Center, offers a myth-shattering exploration of the powerful connections between mental illness and leadership and sets forth a controversial, compelling thesis: The very qualities that mark those with mood disorders also make for the best leaders in times of crisis. From the importance of Lincoln's "depressive realism" to the lackluster leadership of exceedingly sane men as Neville Chamberlain, A First-Rate Madness overturns many of our most cherished perceptions about greatness and the mind.

©2011 Nassir Ghaemi (P)2024 Penguin Audio Historical Mental Health Psychology Psychology & Mental Health Health Leadership Winston Churchill Military Socialism Franklin D. Roosevelt Abraham Lincoln

Critic reviews

“A glistening psychological history, faceted largely by the biographies of eight famous leaders . . . A First-Rate Madness is carefully plotted and sensibly argued.”—The Boston Globe

“Ghaemi isn’t the first to claim that madness is a close relative of genius, or even the first to extend the idea into politics. But he does go further than others . . . His explanations are elegant, too—intuitively accurate and banked off the latest psychiatric research.”—Newsweek

“Ghaemi is a remarkably disciplined writer, and he examines both psychiatry and history with impressive clarity and sensitivity. A First-Rate Madness will almost certainly be one of the most fascinating books of the year, not just because of the author's lucid prose and undeniable intelligence, but because of his provocative thesis: 'For abnormal challenges, abnormal leaders are needed.'”—NPR.org

People who viewed this also viewed...

The Hypomanic Edge Audiobook By John D. Gartner cover art
The Hypomanic Edge By: John D. Gartner
33 Strategies of War Audiobook By Robert Greene cover art
33 Strategies of War By: Robert Greene
All stars
Most relevant  
Engaging and informative with clarification on historical leaders and the events that shaped our world. Shows us we are all somewhere on the neurotic spectrum and leaders are not immune.

Excellent read.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The similarities between great leaders and depression are uncanny. He delves into why some of the most outstanding leaders in history likely had depression, bipolar disorder, and its closely related relative hyperthermia and dysthymia.

Thought-provoking

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Loved the insight as a doctor of public health. Author is a psychiatrist and professor at Tufts.

Solid, evidence-based

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
This is frustratingly not "scientific" as author claims. Study sample is hand picked to prove his theory. Uses one study of all white men to define "normal" and misses obvious counter points. Horribly unpersuasive.

not scientific

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.