Good Author, He Hates Half of His Audience

First off, this author, John O'Connor, sounds like a very fun guy to be around. If he wanted to go to lunch today, I would certainly go with him. He's clearly smart, well read, funny in a sarcastic way. I'm pretty sure most people like him when they meet him. I related well to his temperature regulation. It's always a point of contention with my wife when I'm cold and she's hot. John and I agree on the thermostat.

The book was not quite what I expected and was what I expected at the same time. I love Bigfoot so I am predisposed to be interested in, and to like new information about the undefeated hide and seek champion. This book is more about the hunt than about the creature. The descriptions of the hunts, the hunters and the like are entertaining and again, you would not be bored at a Bigfoot hunt. I was hoping for a little more discussion about any "evidence" and examples of found species, etc. That's my personal preference, so it's not really a criticism. Also, common sense tells you Bigfoot doesn't exist, so there's not a large amount of "evidence".

The bad part; this Bigfoot book is almost a diatribe against Republicans, Christians, conservatives in general, and Donald Trump. There is literally no place in this book's subject matter for Mr. O'Connor to rail against half of the US population and insult and demean the millions of Christians who exist and have existed. Mr. O'Connor is saying that he is far more intelligent and superior to all those millions and to half of the population of the United States. He doesn't care for Trump: he should write a book about Trump. He thinks Christians are stupid people: write a book about how miracles can't happen. (That's why it's called faith). He could be right, but how does that fit in a Bigfoot book?

If you can find an edited version of the book written by this intolerant bigot, I would recommend it. It was fun.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

6 people found this helpful

Interesting but perhaps not essential

Interesting look at Bigfoot myth making with good historical context and some tinges of Covid paranoia and political disinformation. These areas are fascinating in their ties to Bigfoot and I’d have liked even more discussion of the relationship. I do think there are some pacing issues—there’s a very long chapter that is essentially a birding trip that really slows down the narrative. I do get the parallel he is drawing between Bigfoot and the previously-assumed extinct bird, but portions of that chapter definitely drag. I don’t know that this book adds much if you already have done some reading into the larger bigfoot culture. The author’s recounting of primary research in the field is interesting and fun to hear about though. The narration is excellent.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Thin

The Trump references did not bother me; there is a clearly a lot of overlap between MAGA and BF communities. But too many tangents and quotes to compensate for thin body of material.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

I don’t normally leave a review

But i felt compelled this time. First, i am trying to learn a little about the bigfoot phenomenon and why it is still “a thing”. I picked this book because it seemed well investigated and it does have some great knowledge, i do recommend the book. I don’t really understand why or how the writer was able to tie the Iran Contra arms deal,, the republican party and most of its leaders and especially Donald Trump to bigfoot. If I heard “Trump” or “MAGA” once, I heard it 200 times. I have become disillusioned with politics and this guy seems like he can’t even write a book totally unrelated to politics without bringing it up repeatedly. What a travesty because the book is well written except for his obvious TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome). I am not a Trump supporter or apologist, i am a political agnostic and don’t want to hear about either party. I think maybe he should edit the book and remove all his biases. It would make the topic more prevalent. I listen while we are traveling and my wife usually sleeps or reads her own book and she stopped several times to ask me why we cared about his political beliefs and how it pertained to bigfoot. I didn’t have an answer. When writing book about bigfoot and I can tell what political affiliation you are, get some counseling. Other than that, i enjoyed the book.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Interesting story, however...

I really enjoy books such as this and overall enjoyed this one as well. It offered a lot of interesting stories, what I suppose to be solid research, and the author provided some interesting ideas/theories as well. As far as the subject matter goes, I really enjoyed the book.

However, the author also used this book as a platform to bash Donald Trump. I don't personally care for Trump, but the author took shots at him at least 10 times (not an exaggeration). While I may agree with some or many of the statements, I didn't feel this was a proper place for them to be made. There were so many in fact, that I felt it to be over the top and quite tiresome.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful

Something Different

If you are looking for a book with encounters and stories, new findings and theories on the beast... this is not really it. This is more a look at "Bigfooters" and less of a look at bigfoot. The author really digs into what drives people who are believer's, "know-ers" and those in between. There is a good linear history of the beast in society. From early tales, to Ray Wallace, to the PG film and all the way up to Cliff and Bobo. Those brand new to the subject and those well entrenched will find something to like here. I especially liked the bit about the Ivory Billed Woodpecker... very interesting. Yes, the author does not like Trump and brings him up about 10 times. A few of the times, it made sense to do so actually! The rest, well could have been left out but it did not bother me. I can read something I dont agree with and not throw out everything the author is saying. Its worth a read/listen. The narrator is good, the story moves along, seems well researched, has jokes, and if you have an open mind it will challenge how you think about the subject... nothing wrong with that.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The mixed messages

not sure what the point is/was. It seems like at some points, people's belief may be rational, but other times, your irrational cogcognitive biases are more far reaching than ... long and unnecessarily drawn out, seemingly to prove his points.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

tried to enjoy objectively

I've never left a review....Auther uses this as a vector to degrade Trump and conservatives. He points out how he has recognized "bigfooters" are predominantly conservative, then spouts political hate at every chance he gets. He entergects frequently when there is not an obvious chance.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Interesting Perspective

Some interesting information, also credible. The book would have been more enjoyable if the narrator (I believe author) left out his often uninformed political narrative. No one wants to pay to hear that!!

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Leave out the politics.

Good book with good research about Sasquatch. Unfortunately the author can’t stop interjecting politics into a subject that has nothing to do with it. It’s incredibly annoying. I actually agree with his politics but it has nothing to do with the subject matter.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!