Persuasion Science for Trial Lawyers Audiobook By John P. Blumberg cover art

Persuasion Science for Trial Lawyers

 Preview
LIMITED TIME OFFER

3 months free
Try for $0.00
Offer ends July 31, 2025 at 11:59PM PT.
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
Premium Plus auto-renews for $14.95/mo after 3 months. Cancel anytime.

Persuasion Science for Trial Lawyers

By: John P. Blumberg
Narrated by: John P. Blumberg
Try for $0.00

$0.00/mo. after 3 months. Offer ends July 31, 2025 at 11:59PM PT. Cancel anytime.

Buy for $19.95

Buy for $19.95

Confirm purchase
Pay using card ending in
Switch payment method
By confirming your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use, License, and Amazon's Privacy Notice. Taxes where applicable.
Cancel

In this must-have book for both new advocates and experienced trial attorneys, veteran trial lawyer John P. Blumberg shows the listener how persuasion science can lead to successful jury verdicts. Blumberg's new methodology for approaching courtroom advocacy solves the mystery of what makes certain strategies successful, and why information is accepted or rejected by jurors.

Persuasion Science for Trial Lawyers is presented in an easily understandable way, using examples of how to deploy winning tactics throughout every aspect of a trial. Blumberg expertly explains how decisions by juries can be affected by cognitive overload, mental shortcuts, and biases that cause some arguments to be dismissed. Trial lawyers who understand the science of persuasion will be able to avoid these pitfalls and gain a significant advantage over opponents.

©2021 Full Court Press (P)2021 Full Court Press Law
All stars
Most relevant  
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm a marketing copywriter, so persuasion is a big chunk of what I do. I found this book very insightful, and I plan on reading the text version using a more structured approach.

Even for non-lawyers

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I was skeptical, but this turned out to be one of the best books I’ve read on persuasion. I’ve read a good number of the books quoted in this one, and although this might be more of a collection of ideas than an academic work, it gets the job done, and very well.

I was skeptical, but

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
This is an excellent book for civil litigator's and most of the theories and techniques can also be applied to the practice of criminal law. I will listen to it multiple times.

Excellent

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I would add the subtitle, "how to handle people-relations and common situations effectively." This is a voice of experience (dating to pre-digital times), which any thoughtful person can generalize to all sorts of situations. This would have been ideal to know, when I started my solo law (and trial) practice!

Good advice for lawyers, not limited to trials

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The first half a chapter one was a dud. I was close to returning the book. The book turned around considerably after the 1st chapter. For anyone new to a court room outside of kangaroo courts, this is a must read.

Excellent

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
All of the deep insights into the complexities of the human mind and emotion is valuable to everyone that finds persuasion a part of their profession, as well as those possibly seeking insight into themselves.

Enlightening and Valuable information

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
insightful discussion of key points in preparing for and working a trial. I've been an attorney for 25 years but still picked up some pointers. thanks for doing this

superb quick review

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
a person hears about the selection of juries being critical in winning or losing a case, so much so that places like New York City, it is said you can indict a ham sandwich

depth of the material

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
It is great insight into why liberal lawyers do not do well with conservative jurors. This liberal author tries to explain it but his obvious bias shows through even as he attempts to hide it. Short version of his entire book: conservatives are close minded, not as smart, do not share well with others and look to maintain the status quo, while liberals are open minded give freely, generally more educated and able to think beyond their own needs. Garbage. If anything the last four years and especially more recently this bias has been debunked as flawed thinking. Conservatives are more likely to give to the needy than liberals but they want it to be their decision, not the government and they want it to be deserved. Conservatives want the case proven are narrow minded and are less likely to burn the American flag. 😒

Liberal sloth

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.