
Poisonwell
Whispers from Mirrowen, Book 3
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $25.00
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Sue Pitkin
-
By:
-
Jeff Wheeler
The battle to save the kingdoms devastated by the Plague culminates in this exhilarating finale to the Whispers from Mirrowen trilogy.
If there is anything more dangerous than the Plague itself, it is the journey that awaits those sworn to stop it. Tyrus, the renegade magic-wielder exiled from Kenatos, knows this firsthand. His original mission through the Scourgelands met a tragic end, leaving him as the sole survivor.
Now all hope lies with his daughter, Phae, the uniquely gifted Dryad-born who can not only steal memories but also summon the power of the fireblood—and who alone has the power to breach the lost gate of Mirrowen. But first Phae and the comrades who have come to her aid must survive the most dangerous place on earth: the Scourgelands.
The menacing woods prove every bit as treacherous as reputed. Murder, sacrifice, deception, and an epic battle with a beast ensue. Will Phae reach the land beyond the grasp of the deadly Plague...or will the quest through the Scourgelands end in tragedy once again?
©2015 Jeff Wheeler (P)2015 Brilliance Audio, all rights reserved.Listeners also enjoyed...




















People who viewed this also viewed...






Fantastic story!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The best point of Poisonwell was probably Phae watching the past. It provided answers I was craving. Shion has been a favorite of mine. There is a sadness and darkness about him. It makes him bitter sweet. Tyrus, as usual, was great, and I'm relatively pleased he got the wrap up he did. I do love the story, and at many points I was impressed and pleased with how it was twisting and turning. There's a lot to like about this story, and Tyrus and Shion are at the top of that list. There were some great reveals in the last quarter as well which were very satisfying and entertaining.
There are, however, a few criticisms I have. First off, this book really needed a few more edits. There are several points where the narration comes off as rushed, and amateurish, when I know that Jeff Wheeler can do better. When Phae is watching the past, and Shion's brother is talking about Shion's journey to find the tree, he goes into the "as you know" way of info dumping about what has happened up to that point. The second most annoying point was at the very end when Phae says "Of course. You remember everything I've ever said or done." Jeff, you're readers are more intelligent than that. The concept was only completely drilled into our heads.... The third most annoying incident of this was when Phae thought to herself that Shion's real last name sounded a lot like Shion. It added nothing, and in the "reality of the story" was no more than a coincidence. It instantly snapped me out of the story. The book badly needs more editing. Cleaned up, I know it would shine a lot brighter.
Second, the two middle quarters of the book are spent bouncing from one horrible danger to another, and somehow all the main characters are miraculously saved every single time. It's just too much. Had one of the main characters died, any of them, it would have brought a little more credence to the plot's events. Even if there was more intricate plot, and less action fill in, it would have healed the issue. In that same way, the end is so sickly sweet it's unbearable. The wrap up also felt a bit rushed.
Third, and this applies to all three books, some of the ideas are portrayed as amazing when they are simple, everyday ideas. I'm not sure how to spell it since I've only ever listened to the audio editions, but the Ud Hava is a perfect example. It was an idea that if left out, would have greatly improved the genuine quality of the story. It's a bit like when a child shows you a drawing they've done. They think a stick figure is amazing. It's not. People trying to mislead others is constant and guaranteed. It is human nature. There are also a lot of biblical references, some that are too overt. I don't feel like he'd trying hard enough, and instead taking the easy route on both accounts. It's just a matter of feeling like Jeff can do better.
My final criticism is about the narrator. Practically anyone would have been better than her. Sue Pitkin is an atrocious narrator. She spits her words, makes mistakes, performs amateurish inflections, and can't consistently assign a character a voice, or even an accent. One of the worst pitfalls (pun intended) was when she continued to do a "character voice" after the regular narration started, and several in words realized it wasn't the character speaking and mid-sentence changed back to her normal narrative voice. A lot of Audible narrators could have done much better. Michael Page, who narrated the first book would have been infinitely better. Kate Reading would have been a descent female option for a narrator. Whenever I see Sue Pitkin's name on an Audible book, you can be sure that I will avoid it like the Plague.
Good story. Needs edits and different narrator.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Loved it
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I know this sounds bad but what the neck I will be honest. The writers voice feels like a female author and his style may be more attractive to female readers. a lot of word count is used talking about inner turmoil of love and desire or clothes.
better than before
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Great writing
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Not the best narrator
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
loved how the author wrapped everything up!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
I had stumbled onto this series because of an audible sale and fell in love
Fantastic conclusion
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Great Family Friendly Series!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
One thing that surprised me: I am cautious of religious teachings in fiction, because fiction, like many arts, is a compelling medium to communicate ideas. When we "suspend disbelief" in order to immerse ourselves in a fictional world/story, we open ourselves to what is presented to us, and we, to some extent, experience the tale ourselves. We even play an active role in imagining these worlds and the ideas presented as fact. It is a powerful way to share philosophy and present allegories that can move us when our information filters are off; when we are most vulnerable/open to influence. Well, in Jeff Wheeler's books, of which I have now listened to 15, elements of Christian or religious thought (sometimes compatible with multiple religions) always show up, so I am prepared to think critically about these things if they are presented in an influential way. Usually this means I might find them a bit interesting and file them away in my mind under "mildly interesting" (and they could influence me in some way in the future, combined with other experience or information). In this case, however, Wheeler focused, at least in the least 15% of this book, strongly on presenting a treatise on the motivations a benevolent omnipotent divine being (by analogy, God) would have. It presents ideas about the purpose of evil, the purpose of suffering, a relationship between ambition and guilt, the reciprocal relationship between knowledge/wisdom and suffering, why and when [God] would intervene in the affairs of mortals... It places value on free will and argues that evil is necessary for good to exist. It describes an unending cycle, where the influence of evil waxes until the influence of good overcomes it for a time, and that such cycles will always occur. I thought these arguments surprisingly compelling, even though they, at least taken literally, contradict some of my own well-hewn philosophies (I do not believe that evil exists; I believe all of nature is in its essence, good [I will save you from a full argument here in this review]). And you know, in a way, arguing that "evil" serves a good purpose, that individual suffering either benefits the individuals or is a part of a grand scheme that is necessary... Maybe Wheeler's describing evil as necessary for good, and etc.... Maybe that is a definition of "evil" that is not so evil after all. I don't buy all of this philosophy, but it makes me want to seek to understand it better, and maybe what he is describing is more-or-less mainstream Christian theology. I feel compelled, at least at this moment, to pursue theological research and training to understand these ideas better, and that surprises me.
Great conclusion; compelling subtext on God's ways
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.