
We, the Jury
Deciding the Scott Peterson Case
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $20.00
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Shannon Engemann
-
By:
-
various
The Peterson jurors argued and disagreed but eventually bonded to seal the fate of the icy killer who dumped his victims into the bullet-gray waters of San Francisco Bay. The seven jurors of We, the Jury were seven average Americans who never imagined the horrors they would face or the phantoms that would haunt them after they convicted the enigmatic murderer and recommended that he be put to death.
This is the story of how the American jury system worked after being battered by critics for the way it functioned in the trials of O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson. Unlike the jurors in those trials, who second guessed themselves, the Peterson jurors do not question their decisions. It wasn't one thing that condemned Scott Peterson; it was everything.
©2005 Phoenix Audio (P)2005 Phoenix AudioListeners also enjoyed...




















Critic reviews
"If you're a fan of Law & Order or CSI, this riveting book is for you." (Roger Friedman, Fox News)
People who viewed this also viewed...




Terrible Narration
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
...the word 'hyperbole'-she pronounced it "hy-per-bowl"...WRONG!!!
...Laci's maiden name was "Rocha"...the narrator pronounced it "Roh-ka".
...one time she'd pronound "Delucci" right and the next time she'd say "De-loo-key"
In addition, she didn't pronounce some words the same throughout...one time she'd pronounce a word one way and another time she'd do it differently.
It spoiled the book for me. I'm just an ordinary person, but it's not that hard to learn to speak correctly and pronounce words right...at least the victim's NAME!!!
I won't ever get another book with her as narrator. I feel like I wasted my money.
Narrator-less
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Just ok
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
What could have made this a 4 or 5-star listening experience for you?
If the narrator had inflection in her voice.What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?
The case is interesting/How did the narrator detract from the book?
She seems to have a possibly computer generated voice. The pronunciation errors were hysterical which was kind of funny. The narrator ruins the listen/What reaction did this book spark in you? Anger, sadness, disappointment?
The story is very sad. I watched the trial but it has been awhile.Any additional comments?
I would advise people to spend their money on a different audible book or buy the book.Most bizarre recording... is the narrator a human?
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Any additional comments?
The narrator is just awful She reads fast, with no tone influx. I cant bear listening to her! I want my credit back!Unbearable Narration
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
The narrator was absolutely horrible, and clearly unintelligent. The amount of words she mispronounced was shocking and distracting. The worst was how she mispronounced Rocha. Lousy. Just lousy
The worst narrator ever!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
What did you like best about We, the Jury? What did you like least?
This claims to give the reader an true reflection, from a juror's prospective, of what it is like to serve as a juror on a major murder trial that has nationwide media coverage, and it does not disappoint. There were many times during the book, when certain things were repeated several times, which I found a little annoying. However, it was very interesting to hear that they truly did not want to find him guilty and at first did not think he was, but all came to the conclusion together. I also liked hearing how the deliberations were carried out.What was your reaction to the ending? (No spoilers please!)
I wanted to know more about the after math and how the jurors are coping today.What does Shannon Engemann bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you just read the book?
Her voice tone and flexion gives life to the book.Was We, the Jury worth the listening time?
Yes, I have always wanted to be on a jury, so it gave me a good idea of what it is like. I was not surprised that it changed all of their lives, as I can imagine it would.Look Behind the Scenes of a Major Trial
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Her constant mispronunciations were an enormous distraction. Some words were not only mispronounced, but misread. For example, in Chapter 9 she says "a death of evidence", when it clearly was supposed to be a "dearth" of evidence. This is a common phrase with which the average educated person should be familiar. My teenager could have done a better job reading this. It is rushed through as if it were a task to complete with little or no inflection or emotion.
The story itself is gripping and well-told by the original authors. If the narrator had been better, I would easily have given this five stars. It is a fascinating look into our justice system, and helped to reinstill some faith in the trial by jury system.
The narrator almost ruined the story.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
good story, horribly read
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Where does We, the Jury rank among all the audiobooks you’ve listened to so far?
It was an interesting read, but not as comprehensive as I would have liked.What was one of the most memorable moments of We, the Jury?
Reaching the guilty verdict and deciding on the death penalty.Have you listened to any of Shannon Engemann’s other performances before? How does this one compare?
This is my first encounter with Shannon Engemann.If you could give We, the Jury a new subtitle, what would it be?
GuiltyAny additional comments?
I felt it was a rushed job, and would have liked a bit more substance.A Jury that Reached the Right Verdict
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.