
Carved in Sand
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $22.49
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Cathryn Jakobson Ramin
Acclaimed journalist Cathryn Jakobson Ramin takes readers on a lively journey to explain what happens to memory and attention in middle age.
Anyone older than 40 knows that forgetfulness can be unnerving, frustrating, and sometimes terrifying. With compassion and humor, Jakobson Ramin sets out to discover what midlife forgetfulness is all about, from the perspectives of physiology, psychology, and sociology. Relentless in her search for answers to questions about her own unreliable memory, she explores the factors that determine how well or poorly one's brain will age. She consults experts in the fields of sleep, stress, traumatic brain injury, hormones, genetics, and dementia, as well as specialists in nutrition, cognitive psychology, and the burgeoning field of drug-based cognitive enhancement. The landscape of the midlife brain is not what you might think, and to understand its strengths and weaknesses turns out to be the best way to cope.
A groundbreaking work that represents the best of narrative nonfiction, this is a timely, highly readable, and much-needed book for anyone whose memory is not what it used to be.
©2007 Cathryn Jakobson Ramin (P)2007 HarperCollins PublishersListeners also enjoyed...




















Critic reviews
Bland but not boring
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
At 28, I'm not exactly middle aged, but I came out of the book with helpful tips to begin following right now for optimum brain health down the road. It's hardly a boring how-to book, though. Full of dialogue, anecdotes, research data and more, it's a fun read.
Exhilerating and Practical, too!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Wading through the anecdotes
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Clming of some of my fears
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
It got more interesting as she progressed through several stages of intervention, some focusing on brain-damage (minor concussions), lack of sleep, first stages in Alzheimers perhaps, nutrition, meditation and various mind-affecting drugs, to name a few, and not in order of the narrative. What became more apparent was the medical and non-medical approaches to this problem always seems to presuppose that there is a solution, if you could just find the right one. I liked how she avoided castigating the various suppliers of remedies, as the respective remedies' shortcomings became more apparent. It's a deficiency in the issue, not in the people trying to address it, is how I interpret it.
And she did eventually recognize the problem with the way we live being part of the problem (and that we live longer), and the ethical problems associated with performance enhancement.
As some of the reviewers here mentioned, the seemingly endless anecdotes on memory and brain function loss are tiring, and seem to predominate the beginning of the book. I finally resolved to endure that, because the author does have something worthwhile to say.
Interestingly, in one specific case, a diagnosis based on her test evaluation was compared to an average. Since her average more or less matched the benchmark average, the diagnostician said she was average and had nothing to worry about. I found it interesting that a later diagnostician with a different remedy looked at those same results and pointed out that the results needed to be compared against here own previous "normal" state, for which there was no data. But it is a valid point, and she recognized it true on a subjective basis (her own experience time-trend), that is, the loss of function that was clearly apparent to her. The loss in specific areas were very far from her overall mean in the original evaluation, also, which implies the variability associated with the average must have changed quite a bit over time.
As I understand it, this is an example of identifying ergodicity, where the total average is equal to the average at any point in time. In her case, there were multiple areas of evaluation for which one could calculate an overall average. It would be ergodic if at any instant of time the average of those elements is the same as the overall average. The fact no data was collected for her over previous time doesn't affect the nature of this data, which is non-ergodic. A pretty common error in the medical field and elsewhere, I suspect, but often unavoidable due to lack of complete data and full appreciation of the nature of the phenomena associated with the data.
I recommend this book, just be patient with the beginning--it does get better.
Interesting and Improving Progression
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Whiney
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.