
The Mind and the Brain
Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force
Failed to add items
Add to Cart failed.
Add to Wish List failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
3 months free
Buy for $25.19
No default payment method selected.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Arthur Morey
Conventional science has long held the position that 'the mind' is merely an illusion, a side effect of electrochemical activity in the physical brain. Now in paperback, Dr Jeffrey Schwartz and Sharon Begley's groundbreaking work, The Mind and the Brain, argues exactly the opposite: that the mind has a life of its own.
Download the accompanying reference guide.©2002 Jeffrey M. Schwartz and Sharon Begley (P)2011 HarperCollins PublishersListeners also enjoyed...




















People who viewed this also viewed...


















This book has it all
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Great information!
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Jeffrey Schwartz basically sets out to disprove “materialism,” and convince the reader that the 99% of the scientific community which follows that concept are incorrect. I myself am very comfortable with materialism, and do not want to hear a long argument against it.
That may seem closed minded, and perhaps it is, but Schwartz honestly doesn’t do much to help himself. His dogmatic tone—especially when you consider that he’s saying things that are almost anti-science at this point—is off-putting. In addition, Schwartz provides ample evidence, throughout the book, that almost no one agrees with him. I realize that a large theme for the book is that Schwartz, like others before him, is saying things that place him in a very small minority, but he really doesn’t end up proving that he’s one of those geniuses who actually do prove to be right when everyone else is wrong. So in the end, the one thing that he convinces the reader of is that all of science disagrees with him.
The idea that our thoughts and feelings are a result of neurons and chemical reactions just doesn’t bother me. It does bother Schwartz however, and that’s really the crux of the matter. This is very personal for him. Indeed, from almost the opening paragraph Schwartz injects his own personal, first person thoughts and experiences into the narrative. Now, authors often do this in a preface or introduction, or perhaps in the afterward. But Schwartz does it throughout. The book really is autobiographical to some extent.
And the reader can tell from very early on that we’re dealing with a situation where a very smart person has decided not to accept certain ideas, simply because they don’t like them. Schwartz does not want to think that things like love for a spouse or a child are based solely on microscopic goings on inside the brain. He doesn’t like that reality, so he has determined to find a way for it not to be so. This is a pretty constant theme throughout the book, and is going to be a source of annoyance for readers who don’t want to hear about that. The interesting thing is that apart from this, the book is actually really, really good.
It wasn’t just that I was resistant to Schwartz’ contrarian viewpoints, I’m also just not at all interested in them. He insists upon differentiating between "the mind" and "the brain” (hence the title of the book). This seems pointless to me, because whatever the “mind” is, it comes about due to the brain. There’s no mind without the brain. Schwartz makes a huge deal out of the fact that even though scientists know what neurons cause consciousness, they don’t know exactly how they do so. I have no interest in that. So there are things going on that we don’t exactly understand: big deal. I think we all accept that.
The author spends much of the book trying to convince the reader that because people can train themselves to think differently, this proves the existence of "volition" or something he describes as “free will.” This is, however, irrelevant to the argument of free will. It's pretty much common knowledge at this point that people have the power to use mental tactics in order to effect their bodies (and that other people can help guide them in doing this). Jeffrey Schwartz seems to think this is some startling breakthrough that changes everything, when it's old news. More importantly, proving that people can change how they think does not prove “free will,” in the real sense of that phrase. Free will is the religious concept that everyone is responsible for their own actions and therefore can be considered good or evil and be punished or rewarded. How on Earth is this proven by the mere fact that through therapy patients with OCD can gain better control over their compulsions? The real point in the free will argument is that people don’t decide what their DNA is going to be. They don’t determine what tendencies they are going to have. For a 9-year old girl who for some reason is a spoiled brat just like her aunt and her grandmother, free will would be saying that genetics and things like that are not responsible for this, the kid is just being a brat.
During the lengthy first chapter I kept thinking that maybe I didn’t understand the argument he was making. It seemed like he was trying to point out that there are things science can’t explain. Duh. I thought maybe the argument was over my head and I simply didn’t know what it was yet. And I was able to hold on to that hope because Schwartz moves away from the free will thing and onto more interesting subjects in the next few chapters.
Chapter 2 describes fascinating experiments on monkeys. There is some excellent stuff concerning the orbital frontal cortex. But then Schwartz gets back into the free will thing. It’s really a shame that he uses that term, and not others, but I would come to realize that there was a reason behind that. I could never really shake the suspicion that there was some sort of a religious motive here. I must admit that this suspicion became stronger when Schwartz included commentary from “Dr. Benjamin Carson.” This book was published long before most of the country had ever heard of the famous pediatric brain surgeon. At the time the book was written, almost any reader would have thought, “Wow! A pediatric brain surgeon, that’s pretty compelling testimony.” I just had to think that there might be something else going on.
Next the author goes on to describe the work he has done treating OCD and Tourette’s patients. This was all I had hoped for. It really was great and has proven helpful to me.
Chapter 4 is made up of a long biology lesson that readers may have to listen to more than once to keep up.
This middle portion of the book really is excellent. Schwartz gives a lot of great information on the history of philosophy and science. He explains that the brain continues to develop into early adulthood. There is great stuff here about neuroplasticity. The author gives a lot of good info on OCD, Tourette’s, and depression.
The highlight of the book is Schwartz’ recounting of the Silver Springs Macaque controversy.
Schwartz talks about the part of the brain that controls directional skills and how that area is enlarged in taxi drivers. That’s the kind of thing we came for.
Then there is a great chapter on quantum physics.
After a long break, we get back to free will late in the book, and the return is unwelcome. Unfortunately, Schwartz can’t help bringing in religion. It’s not like he hits you over the head with it, but it’s there. Schwartz is careful to include things about Buddhism, so it’s not all coming from the western religion view. He finally gets around to saying that what he really means is that we have “free won’t.” In other words, we can’t help our thoughts and urges but can help whether we act on it.
First off, all this does is reiterate what anyone who has ever gone to a counselor instinctively believes: that there are ways they might be able to help themselves. This is not in any way profound. More importantly, putting all of this stress on “control,” is obviously a moral thing, and it’s clear that again Schwartz is trying to find a way to make sense of the world in a way that satisfies him.
Schwartz goes so far as to reference the Ten Commandments, pointing out that they mostly concern actions and not thoughts. Here we’re really getting into dangerous territory. I mean, I understand that much of the world is still religious, but I would think that most people who purchase a book called “The Mind and the Brain,” are not going to expect the author to mention the Ten Commandments as a reason why his ideas make sense. And it doesn’t matter how many times he mentions Buddhism; if the reader was just waiting around to hear their judeo-Christian beliefs validated, the damage is done.
And of course this all still doesn’t solve the problem that free will/won’t is impacted by tendencies, and those tendencies are based on DNA, and development, and environment; none of which are chosen by the individual.
Towards the end things get extremely complex, and again, readers may want to go over the last chapter a few times.
Schwartz explicitly states towards the end that the idea that “the brain is always going to do what it was always going to do” is wrong. Unfortunately for him, he has done nothing to back this statement up. In fact, he’s hardly even been dealing with that subject. No one doubts the idea that cognitive therapy can work. But what of the individual who can’t receive cognitive therapy? What about the large percentage of people who get no benefit from therapy? You can put someone through a weightlifting regiment and they can become stronger. However, there are some kids who will find exercise to be a natural habit, and some other kids will be lazy. That’s what we mean by free will. The idea that doing things like concentrating on something can change the brain has naught to do with the judeo-christian concept of free will.
Upon finishing the book, I felt compelled to further investigate the author and this book. I often research an author or book before listening to it, to make sure I have an idea of what I’m getting into and what biases they might have. I rarely do more research after a book because I still want to be able to judge for myself what I think, and not be further influenced by other opinions. This time, however, I felt I really needed to.
I discovered that as I had suspected all along, there was indeed a religious thing going on. Schwartz has been quoted as saying that religion and science should not be separated. That statement alone, is so at odds with my worldview there really would be no way for me to respect his opinions on anything in regards to that subject. I should have known when he had quotes from Carson in the book. But I discovered that it was actually worse than even I had imagined. It turns out that Schwartz believes in intelligent design and panders to creationists.
No matter how smart someone is, they may be incapable of dealing with reality as it is, and will therefore do anything to hold on to a belief in the way they wish things were. Obstinately holding on to beliefs which have been proven wrong often has nothing to do with education or even intelligence, but instead is contingent on a person’s ability to deal with reality as it is. If someone cannot deal with the way things are they will go to extreme lengths to hold on to a belief in the way they wish things were, even if they are in the top 1% of intelligence.
Worth reading, despite the religious undertones
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Neuroplasticity
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
If you could sum up The Mind and the Brain in three words, what would they be?
Brilliant, thought provoking, a bit waftyWas this a book you wanted to listen to all in one sitting?
noAny additional comments?
A wonderful book that will change the way you look at the world both inner and outer. It is heavy going at times and the writer sometimes seems to go on and on a bit, but overall I really loved it and have recommended it to my friends. If it gets a bit boring, stick with it because there are some really fabulous chapters.I love books that change me- this did
I learnt a lot
Heavy at times but fabulous !
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Complex
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
What did you love best about The Mind and the Brain?
This book explains the connection between the mind and the brain. It's full of information about how the brain functions.Fabulous book
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You might take a glance and put it down because it might not interest you unless you are a brain surgeon or want to know more about OCD and how it affects the brain.
I just wished that the authors would had gone more in depth and studied more on physical disabilities, such as Cerebral Palsy and the brain. Cerebral Palsy happens when there is a lack of oxygen to the brain and damaged that portion.
I have CP and my brain allows me to type with my feet, as I write this review, but other people with the same disability doesn't have the same abilities like myself. I hope that some day, these authors will do a study on disabilities and the brain and publish their findings.
The authors covered almost everything that is possible on this human organ that is so hard to understand, but they left out involuntary motor skills that is caused by trauma to the brain.
Hard to Digest
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
My opinion: a good red pen could cut many hours of this book, leaving the "MEAT", the real stuff, the motive why we listen to the theme in the first place.
WHAT ABOUT REEDITING THE BOOK?
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Free Will Makes a Comeback
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.